[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 23 KB, 380x353, Stephen-Hawking_0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4074149 No.4074149 [Reply] [Original]

>The second law of thermodynamics is only a statistic observation. It is not unbreakable as many scientists would suggest.

-Stephen Hawking

>> No.4074158

Old news. we've known that for some time now.

>> No.4074160

[Citation Needed]

>> No.4074163

>implying the entirety of thermodynamics is not based upon statistics

It's like he doesn't even know what he is talking about, I doubt he ever said that.

>> No.4074164

>>4074149
of course, unless hawking can find some really fucking awesome demons, it doesn't much matter to us

>> No.4074185

>>4074149
I've read pretty much everything Hawking has written and I've never seen that or think it's likely he would make such a quote.

Where is it cited from?

>> No.4074195

2nd law of thermodynamics?
Do NOT talk about thermodynamics.

>> No.4074202

All of physics is based on statistic observations.

>> No.4074215

>Push me. And then just touch me. Till I can get my. Satisfaction.

-Stephen Hawking

>> No.4074222

The 2nd "law" of thermodynamics is the most retarded thing of science, it's the "the world is flat" of our days.

>> No.4074242

>>4074202

yeah.......no. Pretty much nothing over the last 100 year has had little to do with statistical approximations.

>> No.4074248

> congratulations on demonstrating an elementary understanding of thermodynamics

>> No.4074249 [DELETED] 

>>4074195
I don't ever remember you writing an intelligent message.

>> No.4074256

>>4074222
except for the bit where it's actually true

>> No.4074259

physicits are the most arrogant

>> No.4074265

>Listening to anything Hawking has to say outside of cosmology
ISHYGDDT

>> No.4074275
File: 92 KB, 300x300, headgreab at laptop.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4074275

>Implying heat can flow from cold to hot

>> No.4074284

>>4074256

Nope just pretty close.

>> No.4074285
File: 26 KB, 480x360, emvideo-youtube-zn7-fVtT16k.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4074285

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zn7-fVtT16k&t=0m6s

Who won /sci/?

>> No.4074286

>>4074259

haha you haven't met many pure mathematicians have you?

>> No.4074290

>>4074285

Einstein. Both, in real life and the song.

>> No.4074294

>>4074242
any experiment is a statistical observation faggot. you cannot guarantee anything is repeatable CUNT

>> No.4074302

>>4074275
it does, but not enough to ever matter

>> No.4074303

>>4074256

Hahahahahaha

Nope.

>> No.4074306

>>4074275
>implying it couldn't in some universes

>> No.4074316

>>4074294

most physics over the last 100 years is confirmed by stastitical observations, not built on them. Go back to biology newfag.

>> No.4074335
File: 43 KB, 343x650, 1321578324234.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4074335

>>4074306

mfw implying there is multiple universes, when we can't even decide how many dimensions inside the one we are in.

>> No.4074380

>>4074256
Except that out very own universe seems to be raping it pretty hard with its accelerated expansion and all.