[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 14 KB, 395x395, lenny.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4057462 No.4057462 [Reply] [Original]

I do not have hair on my neck.
I do not play league of legends.


Therefore people who play league of legends are neckbeards.


What kind of reasoning is this called?

>> No.4057467

Conservatism

>> No.4057470

Deductive.

>> No.4057484

Is that a type of reasoning because its a pretty shitty one

>> No.4057488

Invalid.

>> No.4057513

>>4057462
I'll bite.

It's called "non sequitur".

>> No.4058852
File: 44 KB, 291x256, 1305316752166.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4058852

it is called conclusion-jumping.

>> No.4058857

LoL is mostly played by casuals and brazilians, actually.

>> No.4058859

>>4058857
Ergo, casuals are brazilians.

>> No.4058882

Stepping back into the actual topic for a second, it's called "Aristotle's logic" OP

>> No.4058891

correct, but invalid
(just because the premisses and the conclusion hold, doesn't mean that the conclusion follows from the premisses)

>> No.4058905

>>4058882
>Aristotle's logic
>Aristotle clearly said that you cannot conclude anything from two negative premises

I also think you meant to say "syllogism", not "Aristotle's logic", so even in being wrong you were wrong.

>> No.4058927

>>4057462
it sounds like you're trying to twist the inverse of the proposition even though you're just jumping to conclusions. the formal name would be non sequitur, or more specifically Fallacy of the undistributed middle