[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 31 KB, 400x300, uni.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4056848 No.4056848 [Reply] [Original]

hello /sci.

A am god. Ask me anything

>> No.4056851

you suck

>> No.4056871
File: 25 KB, 458x746, 1321587779340.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4056871

Why don't you exist?

>> No.4056875

Seen any good movies lately?

>> No.4056880
File: 5 KB, 251x168, 1296007665438.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4056880

>god
Well, which one?

>> No.4056882

>>4056871
because your conciousness is a part of me that doesn't believe in my own existence.
it's still required for my harmony.

>> No.4056883

You don't even grammar.
You no god.

>> No.4056884

>>4056875
i've seen all movies that ever existed, but it's not interesting, they look pretty "flat" to me

>> No.4056888

How can you have intelligence?

Intelligence is a function of a central nervous system, or similarly designed complex structure capable of transmitting information and storing memory. Did someone build you? Or are you a biological being who evolved on another planet somewhere, perhaps in a different galaxy or universe, and who, through technological achievement, acquired immortality and god-like power?

>> No.4056890

Do I go to hell if I don't believe in you?
Are you all knowing?
Are you all loving?
Are you all powerful?
Which religion best describes you? If none then say
I'm thinking of a number between 1 and a million what is it?
Where are you?
Were you created? If so by who or what?
Did you create humans? If so why?

>> No.4056893

>>4056883
the grammar is inflicted by the limited intelligence of the host i use to interact with you right now

>> No.4056897

>>4056848
>>4056848
>>4056848
Is the continuum hypothesis true or false?! Please provide an example or counter-example!

>> No.4056904

>>4056888
i simply exist. seperating from a part of my unlimited possibilities lead to this universe to exist, which is the part thats still me. I cannot say where the other part has gone.

>> No.4056909

>>4056904
>i simply exist.

You're not god. Only a natural god can exist.

>> No.4056914

Prove it.

>> No.4056916

>>4056893
Why can't your host get a girlfriend?

>> No.4056917

>>4056904
If you exist, then you are a measurable quantifiable object/thing. Using human parameters of measurement (time, length, area, volume, colour etc) describe yourself, or just any observable trait about you

>> No.4056924

>>4056890
>>Do I go to hell if I don't believe in you?<<
no, it doesn't matter to me if you believe in me or not
>>Are you all knowing?<<
no, I only know about facts in this reality, I don't know about facts in other realities that don't exist because they are paradox.
>>Are you all loving?<<
not in your definition of love, but i somehow care about the harmony to be conserved
>>Are you all powerful?<<
no, i'm limited by the mathematical possibilities to create harmony
>>Which religion best describes you? If none then say
I'm thinking of a number between 1 and a million what is it?<<
it would be zero.
>>Where are you?<<
i am in the present moment.
>>Were you created? If so by who or what?<<
it is possible that i am part of a "bigger god" with laws of mathematics that exeed my possibilities, but it's impossible for me to figure it out. In my definition my possibilities are still infinite.
>>Did you create humans? If so why?<<
no i didn't but it was interesting to watch humans emerge under the given circumstances.

>> No.4056930

How do I, a monkey, stay happy?

>> No.4056946

>>4056897
is is true as a mathematical concept, anyway it is a paradox in this universe, therefore you can only think, and not prove it. it is not of relevance to tis reality.

>> No.4056951

are there civilizations in other planets?

>> No.4056959

>>4056917
I am the set of all equations that are consistent in this reality. there is some kind of harmony that allows me to create any reality as long as it is balanced

>> No.4056960

>>4056946
How did you create the universe if there was no time before the universe? Or how did anyone for that matter?

Or, if in fact the universe is cyclic, why the need for a creator?

checkmate god

>> No.4056965

>>4056890
>>Which religion best describes you? If none then say<<
rational mathematics

>> No.4056976

>>4056951
I couldn't tell you without violating the laws of causality.
if they existed, the information about it could not be given to you because it would violate the speed of light.

>> No.4056986

>>4056960
the universe as you observe it emerged together with me from the unlimited possibilities in the moment i decided to seperate from the set of equations that are not consistent in this reality.
this created the effect you call "time"

>> No.4056998

>>4056916
he is probably too busy doing his equations ;)

>> No.4057001

If you exist, why do you allow Messeth to co-exist?

>> No.4057012
File: 6 KB, 251x210, 1299814965441.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4057012

>> No.4057018

>>4057001
OP can't answer, disproved OP, carry on.

>> No.4057020

CAN NUETRINOS TRAVEL FASTER THAN C?!

>> No.4057023

>>4057001
because it's part of equation which desribes your world and necessary to keep the harmony.
[ sometimes it makes me think of it as a good reason to finish the experiment ans start another one ;) ]

>> No.4057028

>>4057023
What? How the fuck does Messeth contribute to anything? So far he's only broken my television.

>> No.4057029

Why do you call yourself "God"? isn't that a little pretentious?

>> No.4057032

>>4057020
answering this question would be a too big interaction for the future of human science :)

>> No.4057038

>>4057029
pretentious compared to what?

>> No.4057043

>>4057032
>>4057038
Why do you choose to ignore me?

>> No.4057044

>>4057038
Well, you said you didn't created the universe or us, why should we consider you a god?

>> No.4057049
File: 56 KB, 498x500, 1321591416915.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4057049

>>4057001
>>4057018
>>4057028
fuck off teacunt

>>4056848
is the fabric of space-time quantized into a discrete structure of particles, or is it a smooth infinitely-extending manifold?

is the wave function a definite reality ('waves' in space-time), or is it simply a deceiving calculation method?

do virtual particles really exist, or are they just a mathematical artifact of perturbation theory?

why 12 fermions (with corresponding antiparticles)? what's so good about the number '12'? why '4' gauge bosons?

is the MWI correct?

is grand unification possible?

>> No.4057052

>>4057049
If a fucking "God" is here, I'm getting answers.

>> No.4057056

why did the chicken cross the road?

>> No.4057057

>>4057043
because anwering your question would cause too many quantum structure collapse and fuck up the universe...

>> No.4057063

>>4057044
it doesn't matter if you consider me as a god. it's your chance to ask me anything. Take it or don't

>> No.4057067

>>4057057
If you really are a God, you either answer me, or I curse you.

>> No.4057069

>>4057028
>So far he's only broken my television.
that was a curse

>> No.4057073
File: 18 KB, 777x301, teacupscicurse.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4057073

>>4057067
>>4057069
saved

>> No.4057074

>>4057069
Thanks to the story I posted because of him. It's all his fault.

>> No.4057075

Can I be a god too?

>> No.4057081

>>4057056
>>4057056
>>4057056
>>4057056
>>4057056
>>4057056
>>4057056
>>4057056
>>4057056
>>4057056
>>4057056
>>4057056
>>4057056

>> No.4057085

>>4057049
answer me faggot

if you cannot into all of those, you aren't a deity

>> No.4057091
File: 105 KB, 250x250, costanza.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4057091

>Teacup genuinely thinks he's talking to God

>> No.4057097

>>4057091
I'm disproving him being a God, you homofag.

>> No.4057098

>>4057081

ok, i'll answer because retard couldn't/wouldn't

why did the chicken cross the road?
because chickens don't fly.

>> No.4057108

>>4057049
>>is the fabric of space-time quantized into a discrete structure of particles, or is it a smooth infinitely-extending manifold?<<
it is quantised in the set of equasions that describes the universe, and smooth infinitely-extending in the set of equasions that describe me.
>>is the wave function a definite reality ('waves' in space-time), or is it simply a deceiving calculation method?<<
the wave function is the effect of the speed limit of causaliy, C. it exists as a materialisation of my fantasy.
>>
do virtual particles really exist, or are they just a mathematical artifact of perturbation theory?<<
no, they are relevant for a material structure to exist at all, part of this necessaryty is the reason why i exist.
>>why 12 fermions (with corresponding antiparticles)? what's so good about the number '12'? why '4' gauge bosons?<<
this is the only way for a consistent universe to exist together with me without violating the balance. If you would measure weight and energy of the structure it would be indeed sum up to zero.
>>is the MWI correct?<<
i cannot say because i am not aware if i'm not part of a biger set of equations that doesn't correspond to causality in this universe.

>> No.4057111
File: 6 KB, 242x252, derp.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4057111

>>4057097
by believing in curses and messeth?

>> No.4057114

>>4056986
>unlimited possibilities in the moment i decided to
>in the moment

sorry OP, you failed. God should be able to express himself without assuming the existence of a concept he created (time)

>> No.4057118

>>is grand unification possible?<<
yes it is, but not possible to be understood by the limited conciousness of a single human. the E8 lie group is a part of the picture, but it still doesn't consider all relevant variables.

>> No.4057119

>>4057114
But he couldn't do that in our language.

Jus' saying.

>> No.4057134

>>4057111
God is not any of those.

>> No.4057137

>>4057114
i need to assume the concept to answer your questions. I have some degrees of freedom that are not possible for concious beings like you, but still i am bound to the concept of time, which is part of the mathematical conditions for a universe to exist.

>> No.4057167

Hey God,
what two primes does 10,745,928,503 factor into?

>> No.4057172

thank you guys, that was fun, thats the reason i love /sci.
now it's time for me to continue creation and seperate from my host so he can find a girlfriend

>> No.4057173

>a am god

why is this thread still alive

>> No.4057175
File: 109 KB, 280x302, 1296273148601.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4057175

>>4057172
you're seriously one fucked up schizo

>> No.4057185

>>4057175
you're seriously one unhumorous /sci/encefag

>> No.4057188
File: 12 KB, 244x206, 45453212.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4057188

>> No.4057195

What's the net energy of the universe

>> No.4057197

>>4057195
We aren't god and we know it's more than 0.

>> No.4057199

>>4057195
zero

>> No.4057205

>>4057197
You including spacetime with that? Because I'm pretty sure it's 0

Taking this thread over, as my well intentioned impersonator is incorrect on a couple of things.

>> No.4057207

keep going

>> No.4057217

Can you be my friend?

>> No.4057218

>>4057207
Hey buddy, what's the general solution to the poincare conjencture?

>>4057217
Why do you want me to be your friend? I don't have emotions, I wouldn't form bonds with you.

>> No.4057237

>>4057218
it's three-dimensional cylinders made of spheres stretching out along a line

>> No.4057243

>>4057237
I'm a hyper dimensional interspacetime hyperbeing and that made no sense to me. The answer is that yes, an n-dimensional n-sphere is the only connected n-shape.

>> No.4057261

No questions?

>> No.4057268

>>4057261
if this was true you may not possibly be my hypergod. dude.

>> No.4057275

>>4057268
Come now, we both know that's not true. I take subservient form when communicating with the simulates.

>> No.4057276

>>4057261
you still need to answer this
>>4057167

>> No.4057280

>>4057276
sorry thats beyond my horison of imagination.

>> No.4057281

>>4057276
102607 and 104729, if I recall correctly?

>> No.4057284

>>4057281
You're much better at this than OP

>> No.4057288
File: 134 KB, 333x500, gorilla.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4057288

How is it that you created light on the first day, but created a light source on the fourth day?

>> No.4057290

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80Lwj_ybVno&feature=related

>> No.4057291

>>4057284
I am the OP, I'm just being much less indirect.
>>4057288
The same way it is I created energy on the first, and particles on the fourth.

>> No.4057293

Hey God, riddle me this:
If girls are attracted to omnipotence, why don't you have a girlfriend?

>> No.4057299

>>4057293
GOD OWNED

>> No.4057300

>>4057293
That's like asking deep think why she hasn't a tamagotchi.

>> No.4057307

>>4057291
OK, I get it, you were typing through a human host, now you're posting directly.

How are you doing this, and why did you not do it before?

>> No.4057320

>>4057307
Panentheism is the least incorrect way of looking at it. You're actually a part of me, I'm just running a simulation because I can. At the moment I'm talking through a different human, OP was just a node like you pretending :D

I'm doing it now because I'm bored, and because I'm interested in how you react. I've done this loads of times before, but- rightly- you've not found reason to believe those who claim this.

>> No.4057330

>>4057284
what would you answer when a child asks you what 1 and 1 is?

>> No.4057333

God I have a question:
If you have a bipartite graph with partitions X and Y, all nodes are connected to at least one, but not all edges on the other side, and d(x)<d(y) whenever xy is not an edge, then why is |y|>=|X| ?

>> No.4057336

>>4057330
If you're offering to answer his questions, you answer "2"
You aren't quite as good at this.

>> No.4057337

>>4057330
Of course, if said child doubted you were able to do math that advanced, it would be a different matter.

>>4057333
>all nodes are connected to at least one, but not all edges on the other side,

Nodes connected to edg- what?

Are you sure that's phrased correctly?

>> No.4057338

>>4057337
not all nodes on the other side

>> No.4057345

hey GOD (II), why is not nothing?

>> No.4057346

>>4057338
Oh, right.
|y|≥|x| because d(x) is always <d(y) where xy isn't an edge. It's in the question.

>> No.4057348

>>4057345
Nothing is non-existent. Personally, I've never encountered it.

>> No.4057360

>>4057346
goddam i typed that out so horribly wrong
oh well, whatever

>> No.4057362

mighty god, what is the reason for the specific size of particles?

>> No.4057370

>>4057362
Everything is relative, if you were half the size you are you would ask why they are twice as large.

Relative to each other, particle size corresponds to both consequent stability and energy. Took some fine tuning to get stable heavy atoms. Keep in mind that a particle isn't a solid object, it's a sphere of Gaussian probability.

>> No.4057378

can all forces and particles really be described in the lie group E8?

>> No.4057381

Good one. And no.

>> No.4057395

>>4057381
ok. why. not

>> No.4057402

>>4057395
The universe didn't work when it was symmetrical, it just made a cool pattern the collapsed again. from 35000k to 21000k, I added "exotic" particles to push matter types apart with additional energy. It's hard to explain with the physical terminology you have.

>> No.4057408

>>4057381
great one

>> No.4057414

Ok God I'm leaving, I have an ODE exam tomorrow, wish me luck.

>> No.4057418

>>4057414
Good luck.

>> No.4057426

What is the meaning of life?

>> No.4057431

>>4057426
Why did you think there was one?

The meaning of life is, simply put, to be interesting and informative.

>> No.4057450

>>4057426
why is atom a atom a and not atom b?
meaning of life shouldn't be a question