/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.3984294]

So as far as theoretical particle/high energy physics goes..
What does /sci think is the most interesting or promising subtopic?

Such as, "neutrino research", "QCD", "GWS" theory, supersymmetry, string theory, gravitational waves, etc... ?

[Anonymous No.3984319]

Actually, one topic I'm interested in is the development of the Owepisaphag Theorem.

[Anonymous No.3984339]

>>3984319
Fuck you.
I actually Googled it before I realized it was a joke.

[Anonymous No.3984340]

What is Owepisaphag theorem?. Cant find anything about it on google?

[Anonymous No.3984354]

would OP's level of faggotry be a constant in the equations?

[Anonymous No.3984355]

>>3984294
QCD isnt theortical dipshit, it is a verified science. It is experimentally confirmations and has great predictive power.

[Anonymous No.3984357]

>>3984355
>QCD
>great predictive power

[Anonymous No.3984359]

>Owepisaphag
>Owep
>Not pronouncing it "oh-pee"

You're worse than the people who pronounce LOL as "lall"

[Anonymous No.3984363]

>>3984340
Sound it out.

[Anonymous No.3984366]

I don't know much about anything, but can you have both gravitons and riemannian space in the same theory?

The way I figured it was that gravity was mass' effect on R space, not a force.

[Anonymous No.3984371]

>>3984359
You're worse than the people who don't realize that the spelling was intentional, and it was a subtle pronunciation.

[Anonymous No.3984372]

>>3984357

>You
>Having any knowledge of any portion in particle physics.

[Anonymous No.3984378]

>>3984372
and why would you assume i dont?

[Anonymous No.3984388]

>>3984366

[Anonymous No.3984392]

>>3984355
Your an idiot.

"Theoretical" does not mean "not proved" dipshit. It just means you are working WITH THEORY, doing pencil and paper work and sometimes simulations.

Nobody said QCD is "just a theory", but you can do theoretical QCD, means you are working with the mathematical aspects of the theory.