[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 12 KB, 320x320, atom-with-electrons[1].gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3914667 No.3914667 [Reply] [Original]

Hey /sci/
theres a particle thats actually faster than the speed of light and sound.
which proves einstine was wrong with his theory of e=mc2..

>> No.3914670

>implying we didn't already know that Albert was a fraud

>> No.3914674

>>3914670
>antisemite

>> No.3914675
File: 60 KB, 627x476, facepalm_robot.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3914675

>particle faster than the speed of light and sound
>and sound

>> No.3914678

>>some researcher messes up the calculations for relativistic time dilation

>>HURR EINSTEIN WAS WRONG SCIENCE IS WORTHLESS

>> No.3914680

Newton: v < 0.1c
Einstein: v < c
Me: v > c

Publishing my papers soon. Nobel prize, infinite money, etc..

>> No.3914681
File: 61 KB, 640x420, 1309340423346.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3914681

>a particle that moves faster than sound as if that was notable

>> No.3914686

If it was faster than sound that doesn't necessarily mean its slower than light,
fucking idiot.

>> No.3914690

>>3914681
meant to tag u

>> No.3914692

no, there is no particle like that.

>> No.3914721

>>3914678
Actually that's not true if you read the fucking paper, which the people who proposed that theory clearly did not. The time was not measured via satellite but by groundlink (independently verified as well), and they made the necessarily calculations and took into effect the dilation between the two points.

Sorry, but current experimental evidence truly does point towards neutrinos being faster than light.

>> No.3914752 [DELETED] 

>>3914686
Yes but a particle faster than light necessarily implies a particle faster than sound.

It would be like saying I'm smarter than you and a rock. Being smarter than a rock implies that I'm smarter than you, it doesn't need not be included.

>> No.3914756

>>3914752

Would there be sound on a ship going faster than light?

>> No.3914757

>>3914686
Yes but a particle faster than light necessarily implies a particle faster than sound.

It would be like saying I'm smarter than you and a rock. Being smarter than a rock implies that I'm smarter than you, it doesn't need to be included.

>> No.3914758
File: 163 KB, 281x417, ahmadinejad.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3914758

>>3914752

>> No.3914763

E=mc², c means max speed, so you can't use neutrino's velocity

>> No.3914790

We've been expecting and even hoping to find something like this experiment, and more testing of these neutrino velocities is needed.

I'm all for refinements to relativity, but we don't toss out the whole thing because of one anomaly. It's still the most reliable means we have for making accurate predictions about time and motion.

Our theories about gravity have been stuck for decades in a similar situation where they break down under special circumstances, and now there might be something odd going on with the speed of light.

Perhaps the two are even related.

>> No.3914803

>>3914667
Measurement error. Get your facts straight before you troll, dumbass.

>> No.3914820
File: 2 KB, 104x127, because_mistake.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3914820

>>3914803
>No error has been confirmed or even substantiated when compared to evidence provided from the experiment
>Tell people that it's a measurement error and not to troll