[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 20 KB, 415x296, clapperboard.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3903999 No.3903999 [Reply] [Original]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfPeprQ7oGc

(you rage you lose)

If you watched the whole thing:

Is what is said there true?
{
If yes, is firing photons parallel to the slits through the electrons path enough to collapse the interference pattern?
{
If no, is firing two beams of photons, one photon every $SmallTimeInterval, parallel to the slits through the electrons path
and letting an observer see if a photon was deflected at a slit by an electron enough to collapse it?
{
If yes, lets call the double-slit with electron and photon dispenser and electron pattern shower "receiver",
place the photon observer some lightseconds/-years away and call it "transmitter".
We let the transmitter observe the photon beam to see "which slit the electron actually goes through":
{
The interference pattern didnt collapse and the transmitter is able to observe
the footprint of the wave nature of electrons left behind in a photon beam.
}
{
The interference pattern collapsed just in time to have the transmitter see the photons showing that the interference pattern collapsed some seconds/years (depends on if the transmitter is lightseconds/-years away) ago. Therefore an observer at the receiver could see that the interference pattern collapsed, leading to possible instant information transfer from transmitter to receiver (double this transmitter-receiver pair to have it two-way). INSTANT COMMUNICATION
}
}
}
}

>> No.3904024

you're a faggot and a shitposter

>> No.3904030

You already made this thread earlier. That one was shit, and so is this one.

>> No.3904039

>>3904030
I wanted to have the ones that didnt enter the thread yet better see the slighty less faggotirily version. But what about the subject?

>> No.3904098
File: 70 KB, 400x300, notsure_iftroll.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3904098

You're an idiot and I see no problem with the video.