[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 36 KB, 656x411, constanza.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3888001 No.3888001 [Reply] [Original]

Why do people lump biology in with physics and chemistry? It would make a lot more sense to lump it in with things like sociology.

>> No.3888076
File: 180 KB, 445x445, constanza_4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3888076

>biology
>hard science

>> No.3888084

I absolutely agree.

Putting "biology" (lol) under the same heading as physics is disgraceful.

>> No.3888092

I really don't understand why this board hates biology so much. Seriously. I mean, is it just not autistic enough?

>> No.3888109

>>3888092
>Biology
>Math
>Implying thing that can't be explained by math is Science

>> No.3888116

Biochem.

>> No.3888130

The only hard science is Maths, deal with it. Physic's nothing more than applied science.

>> No.3888137

>>3888109
4/10 I raged a little

>> No.3888149

>>3888130

>maths
>science

choose 1

>> No.3888153

>>3888001
>>3888001
Why do people think Economics is hard science when it's sociology in sheep's clothing?

>> No.3888155

>>3888130

This is the truth. Math doesn't get corrected once a law is discovered, unlike Physics which changes ALL THE FUCKING TIME.

>> No.3888161

>Why do people lump biology in with physics and chemistry?
>Why do people lump biology in
>Why do people lump
>people

Which people? Nice weasel words you got going there.

>> No.3888167

>>3888153

Because economics involves math, which makes people think it's "fundamental," meanwhile I hear "ceteris paribus" every 2 seconds

>> No.3888174

>>3888153
Okay, seriously. Are there actually people who think Economics is a hard science or are you just delusional?

>> No.3888213
File: 6 KB, 251x234, 1318303951968s costanza.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3888213

>taxonomy
>not just a form of ontology
>science
>not just a form of ontology
>hard science threads
>hard science

>> No.3888219

>Biology
>Hard Science
>One guy posting this every time with the same picture.

I have come to a conclusion that its just one very sad person doing this, and usually the first 3-5 posts are the same gentlemen posting giving the thread "trolling" potential energy.

>> No.3888344
File: 8 KB, 233x216, constanza_11..jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3888344

>>3888219

>you
>not mad "biologist"