/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.3867729]

>mfw pseudoscientists like Brian Cocks continually said that "if light speed is broken, everything we know about physics has to be re-written."
>mfw light speed has been broken
>mfw nothing has changed

[Anonymous No.3867737]

>>3867729
Except we know how much science these physicists really do, one of their most important "facts" being shown to be false.

[Anonymous No.3867742]

>>3867729
The speed of light was never broken.
Where are you getting such shitty info from?

[Anonymous No.3867752]

>>3867742

Particles break light-speed limit
>http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110922/full/news.2011.554.html

[Anonymous No.3867760]

>>3867742
hurr durr

[Anonymous No.3867761]

>>3867729
>>3867752
if mods don't stop banning these idiots

[Anonymous No.3867769]

>>3867761
butthurt

This is a legitimate science thread. Faggot. Go on and suck moar cocks.

[The man with a funny hat No.3867771]

Alright, assuming their trial was somehow different then the NEARLY IDENTICAL TRIAL done some odd years ago, and that they're willing to do heavy investigation to prove that theres no significant systematic error in their design, then:

>Particle moves faster then light
>E=mc2
>Therefore, the particle has less mass then light

Now would you all fucking shut up about this already. Its not complicated.

Also.

>Science disproves science
>God did it
>ISHYGDDT

[Anonymous No.3867785]

>>3867771
>experiment repeated 1600 times
>over 3 months

The fact that you assume a systematic error without there being any proof is frightening. It's fundamentalism.

[Anonymous No.3867793]

I thought there where exceptions (tachions or something), that where partical speculated to go faster then light, but contain no information since it was it its own time frame or something

[Anonymous No.3867802]

>>3867771
>>3867793

Tachyons have negative mass. Neutrinos have positive mass.

Problem.

[Anonymous No.3867836]

>>3867769
You are an absolute moron.

For the billionth time:
A) There is insufficient experimental evidence to classify this discovery as accurate, it's highly skeptical
B) Currently, there are at least two different research labs attempting to replicate this discovery, and the evidence remains largely inconclusive until then
C) We have at least thirty of these threads, with faggots just like you, on here every day with psuedoscientific bullshit "HURPA DERRP TRAVELLE INTO OTHER GALAXY ON NEUTRINOE SHIP DURR", yet you have absolutely no intuitive grasp for any subject matter remotely related to QFT, or even know the quantum numbers/properties of a neutrino.
D) If this discovery is found to be experimentally reproduced, the current agreement within the majority of the physicist community is that neutrinos have more degrees of freedom than imagined, and can navigate through several other spatial dimensions throughout space-time and take a geometric 'shortcut'. They do not violate relativity and/or travel at or above c.