[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 63 KB, 387x302, consoles..jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR] No.3755153 [Reply] [Original]

Is there any website online (Do not mind paying) which offers half decent IQ tests?

I have never taken one and most people I speak to tell me only real IQ tests are done in examinations places, mensa for example

>> No.3755160

Pretty sure you can torrent an IQ program

>> No.3755162

IQ tests are bullshit

inb4 "you must have a low IQ"

>> No.3755171

>>3755162
== Genetic Basis for Human Intelligence Confirmed ==

Genome-wide association studies establish that human intelligence is highly heritable and polygenic
Molecular Psychiatry; 9 August 2011; doi:10.1038/mp.2011.85

"Our results unequivocally confirm that a substantial proportion of individual differences in human intelligence is due to genetic variation, and are consistent with many genes of small effects underlying the additive genetic influences on intelligence."

"We estimate that 40% of the variation in crystallized-type intelligence and 51% of the variation in fluid-type intelligence between individuals is accounted for by linkage disequilibrium between genotyped common SNP markers and unknown causal variants."

http://www.nature.com/mp/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/mp201185a.html

== IQ Reflects Anatomical Brain Differences ==
Annu. Rev. Neuroscience; 2005. 28:1–23; doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135655

"Genetic influences on brain morphology and IQ are well studied. A variety of sophisticated brain-mapping approaches relating genetic influences on brain structure and intelligence establishes a regional distribution for this relationship that is consistent with behavioral studies. We highlight those studies that illustrate the complex cortical patterns associated with measures of cognitive ability. A measure of cognitive ability, known as g, has been shown highly heritable across many studies. We argue that these genetic links are partly mediated by brain structure that is likewise under strong genetic control."

www.loni.ucla.edu/~thompson/PDF/TT_ARN05.pdf

>> No.3755178

>>3755171
My nigga

>> No.3755179

>>3755171

This isn't a discussion whether IQ is genetic. however you want to quantity intelligence. Back to /new/ please.

>> No.3755191

IQ is a racist construct.

>> No.3755192

>>3755162

OP here I couldnt give a fuck, I just want to do one.

>> No.3755199

>>3755192

So you just want to take a useless test for no reason?

>> No.3755200
File: 37 KB, 195x288, blankslate.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>3755179
>This isn't a discussion whether IQ is genetic. however you want to quantity intelligence. Back to /new/ please.
>back to /new/ please
>back to /new/ please
>back to /new/ please
>back to /new/ please
>back to /new/ please

I've hardly ever even lurked /new/. This is not about race at all. I am merely quoting well known scientific evidence about IQ.

And it is very relevant since that poster said "IQ is bullshit." This is a thread about IQ.

Stop being butthurt. Nobody is born a blank slate. Get over it.

>> No.3755213

iqout.com
iqtest.dk

are the most accurate tests I have seen online. Good luck. Ignore all the butthurt fags ITT.

>> No.3755214
File: 25 KB, 350x400, 4045.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>3755200

You positively sprung at the chance to refute my claims citing research that has nothing to do with what i said. IQ certainly can be genetic, i have no problem with accepting that. How we quantify and measure intelligence i would certainly argue is up for debate. You strike me as a /new/sman just spoiling for a fight with some leftist snot who thinks race is a social constrict(it's not).

>> No.3755216

Everyone doing the same PHD on me in physics has IQ's of 130+

Most people I know who dropped out or failed to get on the course were on 110-

Coincidence my ass

>> No.3755222

>>3755216
Coincidence, indeed.

Where I live all black people have an IQ above 130 and all PhD holders have an IQ under 90.

>> No.3755233

>>3755213
The result of the test

By the answers you submitted your IQ is

33

The same or a better result is reached by

99.74% of the people taking the test.

>> No.3755248

>>3755214
>IQ certainly can be genetic, i have no problem with accepting that.
Okay.
>How we quantify and measure intelligence i would certainly argue is up for debate.
Cognitive dissonance with the prior statement. If the metric that is IQ is largely genetic and heritable, then it is obviously a valid metric. What you are saying is almost absurd. It's akin to saying: "Eye color is genetic and heritable, yes. But the way we discern eye color is wrong." If eye color (or IQ) is highly heritable and genetic, then that can be taken as positive evidence of its validity.

>You strike me as a /new/sman just spoiling for a fight with some leftist snot who thinks race is a social constrict(it's not).

I'm not from /new/! Why do you keep assuming this? Why do you jump to the idea that race is even on my mind? The research I quoted above is pretty mainstream. It specifically says that they found genetics to be associated with *individual* differences in intelligence, not necessarily group differences in intelligence.

>> No.3755259

finding the IQ test is the first step in taking an IQ test. If you cannot find an IQ test you aren't worth measuring.

protip: there are no valid IQ tests online.

>> No.3755268

>>3755248

I'm suspicious about how the researchers quantified intelligence. That's all. You can call a bullshit test a great way to measure intelligence, but it's still bullshit to start.

>> No.3755275

>>3755213

The latter one is horrible and gives way too high results. I studyed it years back wen i first began thinking about intelligence sience. Try, for instance, picking all A's or all B's etc.

>> No.3755300

>>3755268

"intelligence" in every day language is associated with a vague concept, so vague that it is rather useless for sience. So, for sience, reserchers created som other concepts of intelligence that ar mor precise than the everyday one (or ones).

These concepts can be shown to be valid, and being valid means that they ar able to predict varius things with consistency. Numerous studys find that this is the case with the concept(s) of intelligence used in intelligence reserch today.

But yes, ther is som variance in how reserchers think about intelligence, wich has prompted som reserchers to simply define "intelligence" as watever IQ tests measure, and perhaps that is a good way of defining it. Other definitions ar somwat vague but clearer than how the word is used in everyday language.

etc.

>> No.3755323

>>3755153

The important thing to remember is that you want to measure your penis along the bottom side, not the top. You are allowed to take the measure from the tip to your anus. Everyone else does.

>> No.3755557
File: 285 KB, 1440x900, MyIQ.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>3755213

Well I'm happy.

Not OP by the way, just passing through.

>> No.3755722

>>3755557

lol, the background looks like a fat woman bending over.

>> No.3755730

>>3755722
CANNOT UNSEE.avi

>> No.3755774
File: 129 KB, 271x241, 1314809124943.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>3755213
115 on iqtest.dk, I wonder what the error bars are.
>mfw i've probably just found out that my IQ could be anywhere between 100 and 130, which is what i fucking knew before

>> No.3755789

>>3755213
Go to iqtest.dk, do a few questions, gets bored and quit on 14/36

get 100 IQ. Fucking IQ, how do they work?

>> No.3755854

>2011
>taking online IQ tests seriously.

I seriously hope you guys don't do this. Even with the half decent ones, expect a significant random error.

>> No.3755882

>>3755162
you must have a low IQ fucking dumbass faggot l2smartness you fat douchebag

>> No.3755900

>>3755854
This. Take it IRL if you want something you can count on.