[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 47 KB, 200x283, a-beautiful-mind-poster200[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR] No.3725437 [Reply] [Original]

What do you think of this film /sci/?

>> No.3725448

>>3725437
It's a shitty film, and it's stupid.

>> No.3725447

Too dramatized.

>> No.3725449

One of my favorites

>> No.3725461
File: 39 KB, 400x442, the_sad_clown[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>3725448

>> No.3725462

I found the whole "dont take your meds" thing extremely offensive as I have family members with schizophrenia

>> No.3725464

>>3725437
Never seen it but I bet its about a retard that does math

>> No.3725465

Never seen it, what is it about?

>> No.3725480

Not as informative as I expected, and very, very sad.

>> No.3725484

>>3725465
>>3725464
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Forbes_Nash,_Jr.

>> No.3725487

>>3725465
>>3725464
John Nash, a mathemetician economist etc, Nash Equilibrium in Game Theory is named after him

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Forbes_Nash,_Jr.

>> No.3725497

>>3725462
Was that what the movie settled on?
I know Nash is anti-meds but I thought the movie came down on the other side.

>> No.3725505

I liked how the scene where he comes up with the nash equilibrium (the bar scene with the girls), doesnt actually describe a Nash equilibrium.

>> No.3725512

>>3725487
It's not surprising someone would go made trying to find rational behavior in a purely irrational transaction.

>> No.3725521

>>3725512
It's surprising that I managed to gain anything rational out of that rather irrational sentence, however.

>> No.3725534

>>3725521
Not really, given how much redundancy is built into the english language.

>> No.3725568

>Russell Crowe as a math genius.
>not a comedy

>> No.3725679

It says in the window

1 >= pi >= 0

All my wtf

>> No.3725688

>>3725679

The symbol for pi doesnt always mean pi, as in the 3.142...

>> No.3725693

>>3725688
I know, but why use a constant that everyone uses as a variable, doesn't make sense...
like:
2 > e > 1

>> No.3725700

>>3725679

Fuck that, isn't it also stating that 1 = 0.

>> No.3725706

>>3725693
>>3725679
pi (the symbol) in statistics means P, so the probability is between 0 and 1.

>> No.3725724

how come all aspie fags shit up their windows with math???

>> No.3725734

>>3725693
<span class="math"> e [/spoiler] is used in different ways in different context, don't assume the one you are most familiar with is the only way people use that particular character. In group theory, <span class="math"> e [/spoiler] is often used to represent the identity element; in linear algebra we sometimes write <span class="math"> e_i [/spoiler] for basis vectors.

Similarly, <span class="math"> \pi [/spoiler] is used for projections in vector spaces, an operator in groups acting on sets, and even a prime element in structures other than the ones you've heard of. Math can use whatever symbols it wants, as long as you define the parameters before using them.

>> No.3725742

>>3725706
>statistics confirmed for retard tier of mathematics

>> No.3725751

>>3725742
>statistics
>mathematics

Pick one.

>> No.3725752

>>3725700
Nope. It is stating that 0<=1, which it is.