/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.3719563]

Which religion has the most historical and scientific supporting evidence?

I'm not supposing any are real, but just out of curiosity, which fucks up science the LEAST?

[Anonymous No.3719606]

Buddhism

[Anonymous No.3719609]

Jedi

[Anonymous No.3719611]

Taoism ftw.

[Anonymous No.3719614]

i'ma say taoism

[Anonymous No.3719616]

Evolutionism, I'll admit it.

[Anonymous No.3719617]

Scientology includes evolution.

[Anonymous No.3719621]

Buddhism, as it does not make any crazy fucking claims. It just says be good to one another.

[Anonymous No.3719622]

fuck yeah taoism

[Anonymous No.3719624]

buddhism

- Buddha denied the existence of a Creator
- Buddha said something similar to the idea that life originated from lower organisms, and humans aren't particularly special
- Buddha denied the concept of the "self" or immortal soul
- He insinuated that there is life in other "world systems"
- plus some other stuff I remember reading about

There are many problems with Buddhism and scientific impossibilities, but compared to other major religions, it is relatively rational

[Anonymous No.3719626]

>>3719622
>Taoism
>Terry Tao
>Terry Taoism

i c what u did thar

[Anonymous No.3719629]

Islam. Tell you the how skin heals itself. Tells you that the man is the one who picks the sex of child. Tell you what parts of the start forming of the child at what time of birth. Tell them that the earth is round and not the centre of the universe. So much other things, but I can't remember since I don't practice.

[Anonymous No.3719633]

>>3719621
>reincarnation
>dalai lama is as/more socially conservative as the pope

confirmed for ignorant Western hipster

Taoism all the way, it's just Easternised-atheism

[Anonymous No.3719646]

>>3719629
LOL

[Anonymous No.3719658]

>>3719629
>Islamic apologists say this shit, AFTER science has confirmed it
>enjoy your logically fallacies

captcha: WTF

[Anonymous No.3719686]

>>3719629
There are no suras in the Quran that support that writing. If there are list them.

[Anonymous No.3719704]

>>3719624
Buddha got most of that from earlier Hindu traditions and beliefs, because in hinduism there is also an atheistic sect which questions why something infinite if real should ever be worshipped because Hubris contrary to perfection. AS for the other worlds with life he got that from an old Sanskrit Strotram that lists nine of the closest worlds from where the Gods and Demons descend including earth.

[Anonymous No.3720253]

Scientology.

[Anonymous No.3720267]

Christianity

Science has turned to the bible countless times in the 14th-16th centuries as reference to claims made in the bible that turned out to be valid.

[Anonymous No.3720277]

Christianity and Islam

Most of their holy books are backed up by hard science and many of their followers were actually scientists.

[Anonymous No.3720285]

gonna go with the bible and christinaity. no brainer. the book predicted that the earth was round in both the old and new testament. something that took science centuries to figure out.

[GayEmoBetch !.pCLIFaWNg No.3720287]

Hawaiifag here.
Native Hawaiian creation myth is basically

>Universe came from a dark void.
>When you die you return to the dark void
&
>Universe will end in a dark void.

yfw Native Hawaiians weren't afraid to tell their kids thermodynamics and were pretty accurate.

Also Samoan religion has similar take. Seems Polynesians in general understood 'the heavens' as just fire/artifacts in the sky. Their gods are all Earthbound. So they just used stars for nav and view stars as information to be used for sailing.

[Anonymous No.3720303]

>>3720285
>centuries to figure out
lol nope. They just noticed how ships disapear if they get too far, or why the horizon is curved, or why shadows have different lengths at different places. it's really a no brainer.

[sage No.3720424]

>>3720277
>>3720285
>>3720267
>christianity
>scientific

LMFAO. I wipe my ass with the bible every morning.

Poor trolling is poor. 0/10