/sci/ - Science & Math

File: 16 KB, 507x302, reaction.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

A quick intelligence test Anonymous Mon Sep 5 18:42:00 2011 No.3691664 [Reply] [Original]

>didn't sleep last last night
>3:30 pm
>still get decent reaction time score (pic related)

http://www.humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime/index.php

Reaction time correlates strongly with g, while movement time correlates less strongly
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G_factor_(psychometrics)

The correlations between the g-loadings and reaction time parameters were as high as 0.80
http://spi.sagepub.com/content/5/2/77.abstract

Several studies have reported association between simple reaction time and intelligence of around (r=−.31)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mental_chronometry

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 5 18:47:00 2011 No.3691691 217 avg

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 5 18:51:00 2011 No.3691713 Got 193 first round 181 second round

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 5 18:51:00 2011 No.3691714 This is pretty fun. I still feel as though practice improves these scores dramatically, though. Also, monitor refresh rates ftl.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 5 18:55:00 2011 No.3691739 File: 22 KB, 483x226, Capture.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 5 19:01:00 2011 No.3691784 >>3691739 nice

Lukas !AMSCIenCEY Mon Sep 5 19:13:00 2011 No.3691866
File: 62 KB, 479x620, Chloe.wat..jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>3691664
>correlated with g

meh.. I usually reach very high scores in g-factor intelligence tests, but I seem to be pretty slow in this (270ms).

btw some times ago I did a medical reaction test and I think I did better with the sound based ones (click when beep) reaching the maximum level. who knows..

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 5 19:16:00 2011 No.3691890 >>3691664 different mouses are going to affect it like crazy.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 5 19:17:00 2011 No.3691896 >>3691866 > chloe so perfect

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 5 19:18:00 2011 No.3691902 File: 4 KB, 212x251, stevebuschemi.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>3691896

>>	None !aevEengREY Mon Sep 5 19:28:00 2011 No.3691952 File: 7 KB, 501x247, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Not that hard.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 5 19:28:00 2011 No.3691953 >>3691952 lucky

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 5 19:30:00 2011 No.3691962 File: 17 KB, 495x237, reaction2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 5 19:32:00 2011 No.3691972 there's probably a good delay in the mouse.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 5 19:33:00 2011 No.3691977 File: 22 KB, 615x372, What.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 5 19:35:00 2011 No.3691988 >>3691890 >mouses Mice.

>>	None !aevEengREY Mon Sep 5 19:36:00 2011 No.3691991 >>3691977 There there slow friend.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 5 19:43:00 2011 No.3692027 File: 6 KB, 514x256, reaction.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>3691962 I'm coming at you bro protip: Its the average that matters.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 5 19:46:00 2011 No.3692037 File: 13 KB, 481x221, beatthis.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Damn I'm fast.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 5 19:50:00 2011 No.3692055 25 tries average 332

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 5 19:51:00 2011 No.3692061 File: 13 KB, 490x239, fuckyear2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 5 19:51:00 2011 No.3692062 File: 13 KB, 486x234, fuckhyear1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] ubermensch reporting in

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 5 19:53:00 2011 No.3692075 File: 30 KB, 536x606, 1311670080360.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>3691664 >a quick intelligence test >testing reaction time >impossible to be accurate because of network and equipment discrepancies oh 4chan

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 5 20:00:00 2011 No.3692095 >average 262 >feelsbadman.jpg

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 5 20:09:00 2011 No.3692131 average 310ms I guess I'm retarded

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 5 20:11:00 2011 No.3692138 >>3692075 >doesn't realize that a browser can load and run the program and just send back the results after it's done >still cannot into computers oh fourchan

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 5 20:13:00 2011 No.3692149 My average is worse than the median. I've also taken several "IQ tests" someone posted and received between 125 and 130 consistently. Both these efforts were made while sleep-deprived. tl;dr all these online tests are bullshit.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 5 20:32:00 2011 No.3692264 >>3692149 Protip: many of these posters are cheating. But I'm just asspained because 230ms is my average. You're right though, all of these tests must be taken with a grain of salt.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 5 20:35:00 2011 No.3692276 A mouse isn't accurate enough for the test. Need to hook up at the neuron level.

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 5 20:44:00 2011 No.3692322 >>3692276 this. Needs moar MRI

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 5 20:48:00 2011 No.3692346 it mainly tests the debounce time constant of your mouse

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 5 20:54:00 2011 No.3692376 >>3692322 temporal resolution of fMRI studies are still far too slow

>>	Anonymous Mon Sep 5 21:36:00 2011 No.3692575 >>3692138 what are computors? Are they in the cloud yet?

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]