/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.3670534]

http://vocaroo.com/?media=vaOBDhjwTdO7cvJBI

[Anonymous No.3670554]

0%

[Anonymous No.3670560]

really thought it's 50%

[Anonymous No.3670568]

>>3670560
ya

[Anonymous No.3670572]

>>3670568
But then, B-50% would be wrong again, because then it's 25%.

[Anonymous No.3670577]

>>3670572
yeah and there are two of them
so 50%

[Anonymous No.3670579]

>>3670572

Yes, and because it's 25%, you have a 50% chance of getting it right AT RANDOM.

We're not answering at random.

[Anonymous No.3670581]

there is no real answer to this question, because it is a recursive structure.
if we choose randomly from 4 possibilities we got 25%. because of the fact that 25% occurs two times the real answer is 50%. but it occurs only one time so its 25%. but it occurs two times so its 50%....

[Anonymous No.3670583]

The question never stated that the randomly chosen answer had to be A,B,C or D. So I have to choose an answer at random among an infinity of statement : the right answer is then 0%, C.

[Anonymous No.3670587]

>>3670581
Exactly what I was saying here:
>>3670572

[Anonymous No.3670592]

>>3670587
yes but he said
>recursive structure
Therefore, he wins.

[Anonymous No.3670601]

>>3670592
winning on the internet is like winning on the paralympics. you just beat retards and therefore you are one for your self.

[Anonymous No.3670602]

it's either A or D but not both, but we don't know which

[Anonymous No.3670603]

>>3670601
yep

[Anonymous No.3670609]

>>3670602
you didn't even understand the question....

[Anonymous No.3670626]

Ok, here's the solution:
It's not solvable.
You have to choose an answer (a,b,c or d) at random, and tell the chance you'll be correct.
You'd say. it's 25%, because there are 4 choices.
Therefore, A and D are correct. But therefore you have a 50% chance to hit the right answer 25% (A or D). But 25% isn't correct anymore. It's 50%. So the correct answer would be B-50%. But 50% is only one choice out of 4. So the chance to hit the correct answer 50%, is 25%. And yet A and D are correct again, and so on and so on and so on ando dosn sadnod oand aso onl......

And btw, they're at it on /g/ at the same moment. And they seem to be dumb as shit.

[Anonymous No.3670633]

>>3670626
And I forgot to say that if it's not solvable, the answer is NOT C!
C would be 0% and you'd have a 25% chance to hit C. So C wouldn't be correct anymore.
I hope you understand... dumbasses....

[Anonymous No.3670637]

>>3670626
what we are missing in your post is the following: it is an recursive structure. therefor nice post but a liitle bit to late, as you can see the explanation in this post:>>3670581

[Anonymous No.3670645]

ITT: Cretins. If you pick one at random, you have a 50% chance of picking either answer A or D, thus, the answer is 50%.

[Anonymous No.3670653]

>>3670637
But the answer in >>3670581
is a bit too complex for the retards here (just read their answers).

[Anonymous No.3670654]

The answer is A, or it is D.

Assume one of them is correct, and that the symbol attached to the correct answer corresponds to the actual correct answer. Then if only A is correct, then it contains the correct symbol. If only D is correct then it contains the correct symbol.

A is correct, or D is correct, but not both, and we don't know which.

I can also solve any paradox of logic, come at me bro.

[Anonymous No.3670656]

>>3670645
troll

[Anonymous No.3670658]

>>3670645
But you Also have 25% of hitting B (1 out of 4) therefore 50% wouldnt be right anymore

[Anonymous No.3670659]

>>3670645
>>3670645

If you pick it at random, you could pick B or C or (A+D)

THe correct answer is 33.3%, but that is not an option.

Boom.

[Anonymous No.3670668]

>>3670654
for example:

"This statement is false" is not true.,

"But if it's not true, then it is false, so it must be true!"

Wrong. If it's not true we can't say anything about it.

[Anonymous No.3670673]

/sci/ I am a genius, smarter than Einstein. I am going to revolutionise the whole world.

Be prepared for me as I rise up and become your overlord.

[Anonymous No.3670710]

>>3670654
hahahhahahahahhah haaaaaa hahahahha

[Anonymous No.3670722]

says at random

2 answers are the same, so its out of 3 answers you have a 33.3% recurring

[Anonymous No.3671291]

>>3670659

Then the option is no longer 25% but 33.3%

That's the problem with questions like this in general. It's similar with computing, things are just picked in a certain order but never clarified.

[Anonymous No.3671308]

ITT /sci/ is trying to solve the "you should be able to solve this" mystery for a third time now

[Anonymous No.3671399]

>>3671308

Requesting SAUCE

[Anonymous No.3671411]

>>3671308

[mtp !EKFQOBEsKo No.3671419]

>>3670534

[Anonymous No.3671423]

>>3671308
it is solved lokk at->>>3670581