/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.3660629]

So it might be true or i have seen wrong upon it...
Every people i met with iq above 155 have hard social condisions.. But thats not the problem.. They arent very creative. They are good at solving problems in math and so on but i have especiallt worked with few and they have hard times solving simple things.. I would like to discuss if there is a point in what i am saying or its just nonsence.. Couse i,m talking of my own experiance..
I have no facts to prove it, all i can is that feyman had quite small iq compared to his achievements and he stated that most of it came out of curiosety.. Soryy my bad gramma btw

[Anonymous No.3660655]

I am guessing you have a pretty low IQ, as being able to spell simple grammar is key towards an individual with intelligence

[Anonymous No.3660687]

>>3660655
>>3660629
Funny couse i,m not an english man plus i,m a multy language kid wich means you state your opinion without any facts or evidence.. Wich i can state to that you dont belong here.. My iq is 124 last i took it..

[Anonymous No.3660697]

>>3660687
You'z trolling.

[Anonymous No.3660700]

If you were "multi" lingusitic, you would be able to formulate your thoughts into cohesive well written sentences.

[Anonymous No.3660708]

>>3660687
>claims to be multi linguistic
Your grasp of English is about as extensive as my french...shouting English louder at french speakers.

[Anonymous No.3660722]

>>3660700
Plzz get /b/ out of here... But if you are enjoying ruining my thread.. You sucseed

[Anonymous No.3660729]

>>3660722
nope.jpg

[Anonymous No.3660774]

>>3660729

Last question to witness your own inteligence.. You are on sci not to conclude and have mostly philosophi threads but insulting other people.. So at witch point can you say you aply yourself as worthy mebmer of sci?

[Anonymous No.3660786]

>>3660774

[Anonymous No.3660788]

>>3660774
>>implies that Anonymous is a member of an organization.
>>There is much enjoyment to be had from what you are saying.

[Xlore !!oIaXoksOFZm No.3660824]

>>3660687
>claims to be multi linguistic
>Hasn't learned english grammar enough to convey his thoughts properly.

Stop throwing that around, just because you have a rough understanding of english doesn't make you a multi linguist.

You have to have a good enough comprehension to understand what you are saying and conveying.

Don't convey ideas until you understand english more, you will generate bad habits and be stuck that way or have a hard time changing.

If you have to say "excuse my bad grammar" you aren't ready.

[Anonymous No.3660971]

The fuck am I looking at.

That's not right.

That's not even CLOSE to being right.

[Anonymous No.3660994]

>>3660971

It's a multiplication.

[Anonymous No.3660998]

>>3660994

Its still wrong

[Anonymous No.3661018]

>>3660971
OH COURSE THAT IS RIGHT!

(2/3) * 4 = (2/3) + (2/3) + (2/3) + (2/3) = 8/3

YOU FUCKING MORON!

[Anonymous No.3661019]

>>3660971

the fix it piece of shit.

[Anonymous No.3661025]

>>3660998

The multiplication dot is missing or can only be seen badly.

To OPs point: maybe some of the most creative minds have never gotten their IQ tested. Also, maybe IQ is not a good indicator of intelligence or problem solving skills.

[Anonymous No.3661032]

>>3661018

2/4= 0,6666... * 4= 2,6666666664
8/3= 2,6666666664

[Anonymous No.3661042]

>multiplcation dot

LMFAO. What are you 12? All Math after highschool omits the "multiplcation dot" YOU FUCKING HOMO! The multiplcation is implied by the syntax.

[Anonymous No.3661049]

>>3661032
Where the fuck do you get 2/4 from?

0/10

[Anonymous No.3661056]

>>3661042

It's not like you deserve a response, but here goes:
2*4 = 2 4 =24 ? That it? Don't bother responding.

[Anonymous No.3661066]

>>3660971
>>3660998
>>3661025
>>3661032
0/10 * 4posts = You are a very dumb highschooler or a real stupid troll

[Anonymous No.3661069]

>>3661056
WTF?
Why did you just go full retard?
Trollin?

[Anonymous No.3661072]

>>3661056

[Anonymous No.3661073]

>>3660629

You've never MET anyone with an IQ higher than 155, not even your professors.

[Anonymous No.3661080]

>>3661056
OMFG How stupid can you be?

[Anonymous No.3661074]

>>3661073
What makes you so sure about that?

[Anonymous No.3661090]

>>3661042
well noone omits the dot between numbers, but on the other hand, noone after highschool actually puts numbers in his eqn's xD

[Anonymous No.3661093]

>>3661056
GTFO GTFO GTFO

[Anonymous No.3661139]

>>3661090

Everyone omits the dot because the only place you fucking use it is in dot products with vectors. Good luck using dots to represent both in calc II or linear algebra faggot.

[Anonymous No.3661185]

>>3661069
>>3661072
>>3661080
>>3661093
Babies first troll encounter?

[Anonymous No.3661190]

>>3661074
Do you have any idea how few people have IQs above 155? If you have actually spoken to one for a good length of time (unlikely), you surely wouldn't realize they had that IQ or be able to make that claim.

Anyone that tells you they have an IQ above 155 is lying as well, or at least it's much more likely then them actually having one.

Basically your analysis is: hurrdurr smart people less social. Smart people = self isolated from people at young ages (I'm seeing it with my little 7 year old cousin right now). Losers = no time spent socially which often leads to concentration on reading/mathematics/that shit.
>[citations needed]

>>3661056
I lol'd really fucking hard. If you're over the age of 8 and not trolling, you may want to consider a career in
>removing yourself from the genepool.

[Anonymous No.3661195]

>>3661018
you're missing the fact that
>2/3 4 =/= 24/3

[Anonymous No.3661200]

>>3660629

6.5/10

i'll give you a 8 on the concept and a 4 on the execution (only since it was a little too forced)

[Anonymous No.3661247]

>>3661195
>>3661195
>>3661195

This is the exact reason I said it was wrong. People seems to be ignoring the fact that 2/3(4) cannot equal 24/3