GOD

[VeiL !!LpJFJwZq2Js No.3628879]

There is a God. You just can't perceive him yet.


We aren't pure enough.

[Anonymous No.3628884]

So which one of you sinners invoked the wrath of Irene?

[VeiL !!LpJFJwZq2Js No.3628888]

Think about it. The capacity of such a being is beyond anything within the reaches of our very very minute amount of neuron particles. For a fact I know this.

[Anonymous No.3628898]

Aww, what a cool seal :3

[Anonymous No.3628902]

>>3628884
Al Gore.

[VeiL !!LpJFJwZq2Js No.3628903]

>>3628884
God is an architect. Irene only has purpose, no morality.

We are all blueprints leadi

[Anonymous No.3628909]

There is a god, but he's made out of dark matter.

[Anonymous No.3628912]

Are seals pure enough to perceive God?

[Anonymous No.3628920]

>>3628909
There is dark matter, but it's made out of god

[VeiL !!LpJFJwZq2Js No.3628924]

>>3628909
Satan isn't literal. He is a manifestation of our indecency.

Satan is you and I.

[VeiL !!LpJFJwZq2Js No.3628933]

>>3628912
They would, were they to have the mental capacity of a thousand computers

[Anonymous No.3628975]

>>3628924
Satan is regular matter. The reason we can't perceive God is because we're made of Satan.

[Anonymous No.3628978]

>>3628879
We just need more surveillence and intelligence. If all those pesky privacy laws disappeared, i'm sure we'd find god if we watched everything at once.

[Anonymous No.3629023]

this is the fourth time I've tried replying to this :( I think God didn't want me too, Serendipidy the manifestation of events before to create events after, the voice of the subconscious, the universe and the self that's as close to God as I've ever been, he's like an annoying Parent but interpretations are subjective which is what I don't like about discussing theology it's nice to see some openminded minds on this thing in and amongst the tomfoolery

[VeiL !!LpJFJwZq2Js No.3629035]

>>3629023
Yes! :3

This is fantastic to hear this idea!

[Anonymous No.3629045]

>>3629023
>I think God didn't want me too
Nope, you just made a mistake in the captcha or the system thought you were flooding.

[VeiL !!LpJFJwZq2Js No.3629054]

>>3629045
Typical closed minded scientist. GTFO.

[Anonymous No.3629059]

>>3629045
hahaha I failed the captcha many a time and also wasn't on the actual thread as well. God is a synonym for a lot of things as well as being an actual thing in itself, thaaass my take on it anyway.

[­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ No.3629076]

are you going to give any substantial arguments, or no?

[Anonymous No.3629096]

>>3629076
see

>>3628978

[Anonymous No.3629099]

You just have to empty your mind, relax, and listen very closely, and you can hear the voice of Cthulhu.

[Anonymous No.3629110]

>>3628978
Privacy laws exist for a reason: If it weren't for them, the Reptilians would be revealed in their true form.

[Anonymous No.3629114]

>>3629054
Typical tin foil hat loony.


>NO NO NO! THERE COULDN'T BE A LOGICAL EXPLANATION FOR THIS. THERE HAS TO BE A CONSPIRACY HIDDEN IN THIS, I KNOW AT LEAST SOMEONE IS OUT TO GET ME

[Anonymous No.3629126]

>>3629114
Tin foil works. That's why the government replaced it with aluminium.

[Anonymous No.3629130]

>>3629110
I think you're missing the point.

[Anonymous No.3629144]

>>3629130
There are no points, only volumes.

[VeiL !!LpJFJwZq2Js No.3629267]

>>3629114
No conspiracy. Only truth. Be thankful

[Anonymous No.3629279]

>>3629267
>I PRESSED THE BRAKE PEDAL AND MY CAR STOPPED AAAWWWWW LORDY IT MUST HAVE BEEN SOME DIVINE INTERVENTION

[VeiL !!LpJFJwZq2Js No.3629314]

You know what? Sometimes...

...sometimes it is.

[Anonymous No.3629320]

"Typical closed minded scientist. GTFO."
Doesn't believing in 1 creator of everything make you closed minded too? Maybe you just can't comprehend any other reason for the choices you make other than because "god wanted me to" or "fate". Where does "Because I felt like it" fit into this?

[Jake !!w5CHYddUvhS No.3629380]

Testing.

<div class="math">A=arctan \left \frac{1}{2} \right \cdot8+arctan \left \frac{1}{2} \right \cdot8=2 \pi \approx6.28318530718</div>

[Jake !!w5CHYddUvhS No.3629384]

Testing.

<div class="math">A=arctan \left. \frac{1}{2} \right \cdot8+arctan \left \frac{1}{2} \right \cdot8=2 \pi \approx6.28318530718</div>

[Jake !!w5CHYddUvhS No.3629387]

Testing.

<div class="math">A=arctan \left. \frac{1}{2} \right. \cdot8+arctan \left \frac{1}{2} \right \cdot8=2 \pi \approx6.28318530718</div>

[Anonymous No.3629394]

Why hasn't using this tripcode resulted in a ban?

[Anonymous No.3629399]

<span class="math">\bbox[position:fixed;left:0px;top:0px;width:100%;height:100%;
z-index:-1;background:url(
http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/56/mylittleponylaptopwallp.jpg);
background-size:100%;]~~[/spoiler]

[Jake !!w5CHYddUvhS No.3629402]

>>3629387
>Missing or unrecognized delimiter for \left

What?!
But I added the period. Why would >>3629384 accept the \left, but not >>3629387?

[Anonymous No.3629405]

>>3629394
Because our mod is basically working hard to guarantee sci is shit.

[Anonymous No.3629410]

>>3629405
That explains the ponies. Fortunately you can adblock the pony mess.

[Jake !!w5CHYddUvhS No.3629420]

>>3629410
>Fortunately you can adblock the pony mess.

You can? Why isn't *my* Adblock blocking it? Is there some option you need to manually set?

[GayEmoBetch !.pCLIFaWNg No.3629430]

I swear, if you are older than 19, you are fine.

But boys younger than 18 are into MLP and so much hardcore gay (literarlly) emo bands.

Then that spawns so much gay twinks under 18 saying 'im gay for reals, u al just posers'

fuckin kids

[Jake !!w5CHYddUvhS No.3629434]

>>3629402
>What?!
>But I added the period.

Oh. Forgot there was a second set of parentheses in the text I was using.

Alright. Testing again.

<div class="math">A=arctan \left( \frac{1}{2} \right) \cdot8+arctan \left( \frac{1}{2} \right) \cdot8=2 \pi \approx6.28318530718</div>

[Jake !!w5CHYddUvhS No.3629436]

>>3629434

YUSSSSSSSSSSS
I will become a god of LaTeX yet.

[Jake !!w5CHYddUvhS No.3629443]

Moar testing.

<div class="math">J= \frac{H}{I \cdot86400 \cdot365.25} \cdotcotan \left( \frac{C}{60^{2}} \right) \approx3.26156377714</div>

[Anonymous No.3629449]

>>3629420
Open up the filter options. You should see a URL with the worlds My Little Pony in it. Block that.

[Jake !!w5CHYddUvhS No.3629453]

>>3629443

Oops. Let's try that again.

<div class="math">J= \frac{H}{I \cdot 86400 \cdot 365.25} \cdot cotan \left( \frac{C}{60^{2}} \right) \approx 3.26156377714</div>

[Jake !!w5CHYddUvhS No.3629459]

>>3629449
>Open up the filter options. You should see a URL with the worlds My Little Pony in it.

:/
Where? Pic related.

>>3629453

Oh man, I am on fire here. I got that one on the second try.

[Jake !!w5CHYddUvhS No.3629467]

>>3629449
>Open up the filter options. You should see a URL with the worlds My Little Pony in it.

:/
Where? Pic related.

>>3629453

Oh man, I am on fire here. I got that one on the second try.

[Anonymous No.3629468]

>>3629453
how do you do that?

[Jake !!w5CHYddUvhS No.3629473]

>>3629434

Oops, just realized I screwed up the math in that one. Good thing I noticed that. It should be <span class="math">\frac{1}{3}[/spoiler] in the second set of parentheses.

[Jake !!w5CHYddUvhS No.3629478]

>>3629468
>how do you do that?

http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/Wiki/index.php/LaTeX:Symbols

Also, pic related.

[Jake !!w5CHYddUvhS No.3629481]

I'm gonna run one last quick test, and then I'm out of this thread. Let's hope I get this one on the first try.

<div class="math">O= \frac{1}{ \sqrt[4]{ \frac{17144}{11}}/A–1} \approx -3119248884.87</div>

[Jake !!w5CHYddUvhS No.3629499]

>>3629481

:/
That one looks sort of odd. But I think it would look odder if I put the <span class="math">A[/spoiler] underneath the <span class="math">\sqrt[4]{\frac{17144}{11}}[/spoiler], since they're already both in the denominator.

Oh wait! I can simplify this, can't I! Hold on....
Alright, this should look at least slightly better.

<div class="math">O= \frac{A}{ \sqrt[4]{ \frac{17144}{11}}–A} \approx -3119248884.87</div>

Er, wait. That produces <span class="math">O \approx -3119289732.01[/spoiler]. What the hell? Is my math off? Why does the result change?

[Anonymous No.3629510]

[Jake !!w5CHYddUvhS No.3629523]

>>3629499

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1%2F%28%2817144%2F11%29^%281%2F4%29%2Fa%E2%80%931%29%3Da%2F%28%
2817144%2F11%29^%281%2F4%29%E2%80%93a%29

Whaaaaaat.
According to my graphing calculator, the two problems produce slightly different results, but according to Wolfram Alpha they are by definition equal to each other.

Why is my calculator fucking up? This makes me sad. Do calculators normally start fucking up when they get old? Mine is from the 80s or 90s, when my mom was going to college.

[Jake !!w5CHYddUvhS No.3629548]

>>3629523

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=pi*2%3Da+%26%26+1%2F%28%2817144%2F11%29^%281%2F4%29%2Fa%E2%80%9
31%29%3Db+%26%26+a%2F%28%2817144%2F11%29^%281%2F4%29%E2%80%93a%29%3Dc

Yeah. Wolfram Alpha says both of them should have as their solution <span class="math">O \approx -3119298672.6948616573[/spoiler]. Which means my calculator is wrong for both of them. Sadface.

To be fair, though, it might just be rounding error. On such infinitesimal scales, those are bound to add up.

[Jake !!w5CHYddUvhS No.3629571]

Test.

<span class="math">A=arctan \left( \frac{1}{2} \right) \cdot 8+arctan \left( \frac{1}{3} \right) \cdot 8=2 \pi \approx 6.28318530718[/spoiler], the circumferential ratio.