/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.3612519]

Racial egalitarianism isn't substantiated enough to hold any weight in the scientific community, hence why most either are agnostic or believe the psychological differences are partially innate.

The argument from genetics that states "general intelligence is highly polygenic and the human "races" highly genetically similar, therefore the intellectual differences are entirely caused by societal variables" is weak when you both examine the lack of much other data supporting this (and nearly all data in the fields of neuroscience and psychology strongly backing up a partial hereditary component) and our rudimentary understanding of human genetics.

But of course your foolish tendency for moralistic bias allows you to supersede reason and proliferate this currently fantastical view on human group differences.

[Anonymous No.3612522]

>>3612519
>Racial
Stopped reading right there. Go to >>>/b/

[Anonymous No.3612559]

>>3612522
/int/ actually.

[Anonymous No.3612712]

>>3612519
I don't afraid of nothing.

How about we stop jerking off with physiognomy and Identify the ACTUAL GENES that determine intelligence.

[Anonymous No.3612736]

Ho hum, more false dichotomy.

[Anonymous No.3612918]

>>3612519

I wonder if you see the irony of using a picture of a TV character who was explicitly written as a dumb-ass.

[Anonymous No.3613463]

So lets say african americans are genetically predisposed to be slightly less intelligent at birth. Now what? How do you apply this knowledge in the real world? All this does is provide more impetus for shouting "lol ur dum." It can't be used for any social good so why is this "fact" so important to you?

When you reach a certain level of maturity you learn that certain facts are better buried.