[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 463 KB, 1600x1200, beautiful_neytiri_in_avatar-normal.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR] No.3612207 [Reply] [Original]

Would you let an alien suck your dick, /sci/?

>> No.3612211
File: 26 KB, 565x546, NOTSCIENCE.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

Only if it looked completely human.

>> No.3612213
File: 16 KB, 500x271, a_170AlienQueen.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

No...

>> No.3612214

Depends greatly on the alien. I think the na'avi or whatever look a bit derp personally.

>> No.3612217
File: 63 KB, 848x480, 1297975427375.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

Depends on the mouthparts and the saliva-analogue.
Provisionally yes.

>> No.3612219

While I'm sure there is a habitable planet orbiting Alpha Centauri A, I seriously doubt they will look like a Na'Vi. As such, I would have to inspect any apparatus capable of sucking before I allowed one anywhere near my dick.

>> No.3612236

>>3612219
I wouldn't be so sure there, broski. We know almost nothing about planet formation in binary systems.

>> No.3612271

>>3612219

If I go to alpha centauri's Planet I'm staying the fuck away from the aliens.

Mind worms aren't going to get ME.

>> No.3612279

>>3612207
Hmm... The na'vi are all about 3.5 meters tall and probably have superior sucking capacity, the experience would probably be similar to being sucked off by a a toothless shark with a powerful vacuum cleaner up its arse....


Still, I'd hit it. brb Contacting /tv/ for impressive amounts or rage

>> No.3612284
File: 88 KB, 720x526, 1311355056206.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

Would you let an alien suck your dick, /sci/?

>> No.3612285

>>3612207
If I considered it to not be sexually attractive (unlike OP's picture...) and I was confident there was no danger involved, totally.

>> No.3612300

>>3612207
>>3612207

Honestly, now. After mankind makes first contact how long do you really think it will take for a human to fuck an alien.

Assuming even vaguely similar physiology i'm guessing not very long at all.

While it might be very unlikley for any particular extraterrestrial life to be similar, it might be that technological life is far more likley to be similar to us. That could make the chances 100 million times better - only one species of technological life on earth and all.

>> No.3612303

>>3612284

So you pick the image of an alien that looks like a giant penis to argue against alien sex.

>> No.3612304

>>3612284
FUCK YOU, that looks like a dick sucking wonderland...

>> No.3612323

>>3612300
Rape and pillaging is traditional for invading humans and judging by humanities regular actions when meeting new people....

30 seconds?

>> No.3612337
File: 885 KB, 562x999, 1309696996608.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>3612303
Who says I'm arguing against it?

>> No.3612350

>>3612207
Depends are we talking rubber forehead type aliens or starfish aliens?

>> No.3612354

if it paid me, sure

>> No.3612358
File: 25 KB, 314x320, Predators-movie-image-210.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

sure ill try anything once

>> No.3612355

>>3612284
I lol'd

>> No.3612363

gtfo Abatap.

>> No.3612387

>>3612350
Starfish aliens, and once you disrobed, there was no turning back...(but assume their culture had some form of romance)

>> No.3612394

This thread is legendary....

>> No.3612410

If it won't rip my dick off and its saliva works like the vaginal fluid of dolphins, YES.

>> No.3612419
File: 33 KB, 485x323, alien-film.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

Would you suck an alien's dick, /sci/?

>> No.3612421
File: 29 KB, 478x514, 1312527524226.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>ctrl+f
>no cry more
>remember abatap only posts on /tv/

>> No.3612440
File: 3 KB, 126x95, trollblack.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

yes, especially if it could get pregnant through sucking my cock.

>> No.3612442

Standard human courting would be required, a mental connection is likely to be the more prevalent one as standard human judgement for finding a suitable mate attractive would not be applicable. Might still find attractive though, can admire more than just a human form.

Human-alien romance is very much an option in my books.

>> No.3612447

Beastiality is a sin and a crime against the species. Kill all xeno loving scum.

>> No.3612458

>>3612447
Think the main objection to bestiality is that the animal is not capable of consent. Obviously you wouldn't go to another planet and fuck the local wildlife but a sentient species, capable of communication and understanding what is going on, that would be a different story.

>> No.3612467

I would let anything suck my dick at this point, OP.

>> No.3612479

>>3612467
>implying you have a choice in the matter

>> No.3612482
File: 367 KB, 400x257, 3598305723.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>3612458
>dat backwards heretic logic

>> No.3612500

>>3612458
The main point of bestiality is that you are doing it with an animal. consent has nothing to do with this,. You are not supposed to have sex with an animal, because things do not work that way.

In regards to xenophilia, it too can be considered a deviation, since you are not meant to mate with something that does not even share the same DNA with you.

>> No.3612507

>>3612500
>You are not supposed to have sex with an animal, because things do not work that way.
Or wearing a condom.
Or in the pooper.
Or with hand.
....

>> No.3612506

>You are not supposed to have sex with an animal

Who decided what I'm supposed to do and what not?

>> No.3612513

>>3612507
or being reasonable on internet.

>> No.3612518

>>3612513
just out of curiosity, are you
>implying I'm unreasonable
or
>implying 'it doesn't work that way' is unreasonable

>> No.3612532

>>3612518
i'm implying your idiocy on the matter.
sexual attraction towards animals is a deviation, pure and simple.
Everyone is disgusted by it, its a criminal activity, and most of such behaviour can be classified as a mental ilness. I also highly doubt that any animal is aroused by a sight of humans.

>> No.3612541

>>3612532
Okay?

When exactly did we decide that biology was something to base ethics off of...?

>> No.3612546
File: 23 KB, 294x345, mackey.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>3612532
Not that guy, but...
WOW

Prejudice much?

>> No.3612547

oh boy it's the UNLESS IT RESULTS IN REPRODUCTION IT'S AGAINST GODS WILL DERKA DERKA argument

again

>> No.3612548

>>3612532
>Everyone is disgusted by it,

No, clearly the people who fuck animals aren't.

>its a criminal activity,

Not everywhere, it isn't.

>and most of such behaviour can be classified as a mental ilness.

ilness, huh. Just like faggotry etc.

>I also highly doubt that any animal is aroused by a sight of humans.

Wrong.

>> No.3612549

>>3612500
Technically unless you are fucking your identical twin, everything has different DNA to you. But that's not the point and neither is an appeal to what is natural. This is a matter for law and philosophy, not biologists.

The main reason for something like that being bad is that it causes more harm or takes advantage of another creature. Homosexuality between two consenting adults is fine but heterosexual sex with someone who is under age is illegal. While it may be unnatural, it is as comparable to bestiality as normal sex is to statutory rape.

>> No.3612550

>>3612532
Fuck you. Nothing in the universe is objective. Just because society has deemed something immoral, does not make it so.

In the middle ages, when science was heresy, would you have been one of those shouting for Galileo's execution? I doubt it.

Think a little before you post damnit.

>> No.3612553

>>3612532

>Everyone is disgusted by it,
apparently not those people who do it

>its a criminal activity,
appeal to force

>and most of such behaviour can be classified as a mental ilness.
genetic fallacy

>I also highly doubt that any animal is aroused by a sight of humans.

http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2009/02/04/dolphin-raeps-girl/

>> No.3612556
File: 188 KB, 318x806, legs3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

Most definitely.

>> No.3612568

>>3612532
>sexual fetishes classified as mental illness.
HAHAHAHAHAHA

>> No.3612569

>>3612541
since the start of civilization.
ethic on the matter is subjective. But it exists to make society work. If you fuck animals, you are a potential pathogen carrier, and we don't want that.
Most people are disgusted by such idea, and by extension, you will be ostracised because of it.
Rules like that exist because of the majority and biology.
Most people are not attracted sexually to animals and vice versa.

>> No.3612578

>>3612532
>i'm implying your idiocy on the matter.
I have absolutely no opinion on the matter, so how can it be idiotic?
I just pointed out the simple fact that 'it doesn't work that way' isn't an argument. One doesn't have sex because it works that way, but because one wants to have sex.

>> No.3612580

Guise, I think you misunderstood the question, this is /sci/ not /b/.

It's not "do you think it's morally praise allah correct to let an alien suck your dick"

It's a more scientifically viable
"Since the chemicals and shape of an alien developed in isolation from ours, would we be attracted enough to an alien to let them suck us off.

I say yes.

>> No.3612588
File: 123 KB, 270x260, 1304603195788.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>introduce ethics to /sci/
>everyone is raging

>> No.3612587

>>3612568
I love a mentally ill chick, it's my biggest fetish.Uuuuugh, depression and mania.

>> No.3612593
File: 199 KB, 750x510, claymore_lmao.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>3612569
Many pets that we keep respond to the same pheromones that humans do and vice versa.

And whether they admit it or not, almost all humans DO get aroused from seeing animals having sex. And vice versa.

It's a taboo alright. But that doesn't make it any more 'right' than any other taboo.

Zoonotic diseases can be checked for and can usually be cured.

>> No.3612609
File: 21 KB, 471x480, 1281685329342.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

I post threads about computers/robots/physics/math and get 20 replies max. This guy makes a thread about aliens sucking your dick and its the most popular thread?

FUCK YOU /SCI/
FUCK. YOU.

>> No.3612617

>>3612593
The chance of diseases from interspecies sex is just as much an argument against heterosexual sex.

Taboos also exist for various reasons. Some are valid, others are pointless dogma. If an issue arises that conflicts with previous taboos, it's likely to be reassessed and may not be a taboo for long eg. Homsexuality or various "normal" fetishes.

>> No.3612621
File: 1.43 MB, 260x212, 1278368169767.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>3612609
welcome to 4chan.

>> No.3612622

>>3612609
That's because questions about fellatio are fun.

>> No.3612653

>>3612593
>Many pets that we keep respond to the same pheromones that humans do and vice versa.

Nope. It hasn't even been conclusively shown that humans HAVE

>And whether they admit it or not, almost all humans DO get aroused from seeing animals having sex. And vice versa.

You just keep telling yourself that.

>> No.3612674

>>3612653
No, scientific studies keep telling me that.

Shocking, isn't it? That someone could regard science as more plausible than your prejudices!

>> No.3612675

>>3612593
>almost all humans DO get aroused from seeing animals having sex
AHAHAHAHAHA
keep convincing yourself that because you're into bestiality, that everyone secretly is.
"they wont admit it because its taboo"
LOL ok.

>> No.3612699

>>3612674
>No, scientific studies keep telling me that.

Source of GTFO.

>> No.3612706

>>3612675
Can't say for sure, but he may not even feel a need to suggest most people do it just to justify it for himself. Many people into sick shit are perfectly comfortable with the fact that it's sick shit. Making it sound common doesn't really help. Doesn't mean he doesn't think that though.

>> No.3612713

>implying the alien would even be multicellular
>implying a multicellular alien would be animal like
>implying an animal like alien would look and behave anything like a human

Short answer: no.

>> No.3612882
File: 14 KB, 295x265, awww yeaa.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

i would definitely fuck a navi alien girl. i thought the movie was ok, but as soon as i got home i looked up neytiri (the main alien bitch in the movie) photoshop porn and couldn't find any. i had to wait a few weeks for some decent drawing and photoshops to turn up on google, but it was worth it. god, you'd have to be a homo not to fuck a navi girl. u must be intimidated by their superior size and strength.

>> No.3612892

>>3612882
>u must be intimidated by their superior size and strength.
>Implying it isn't perfectly reasonable to be intimidated by nine foot tall expert bow hunters with skeletons made of a naturally occurring carbon fiber.

>> No.3612916

>>3612882
They look similar to black chicks, which look similar to apes. Not my thing, but hey, if you're into that....

>> No.3612943
File: 44 KB, 256x343, wut2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>3612892
Seriously, Sex without some sort of reinforcement augmentation would probably result in you having most of your bones broken unless she was very VERY careful.

Anyways, my policy is that anything goes between two sapient species. A sapient fucking a non-sapient is shameful and demeaning. Fuck's sake, just use a dildo or something.

>> No.3613011

This whole thread is sexually confusing. I don't know what to think any more. I'm going to watch some dog fucking a woman while I fap.