[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 13 KB, 300x300, 1254546103964.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR] No.3607454 [Reply] [Original]

You spend 10 years "educating" yourself in a discipline until you finally acquire enough knowledge, accidentally, to start deprogramming all the bullshit you learnt from popular science, sensationalist/dishonest academics and plain old propaganda. Then you're capable of spotting intellectual dishonesty a mile away, but you've wasted your life already, and since you're only one out of millions of cattle and no one will listen to you, business goes on as usual.

Sorry, just my rant on modern "scientific" literature. I mainly blame Anglos for the current state of affairs by the way.

How does this make you feel?

>> No.3607456

Like you slept through all your history classes.

>> No.3607469

i never had to do that. 10 years, by the way, is a fraction of a lifetime and it'd take a dedicated individual much less time to become basically informed about how everything works.

>> No.3607473

only 10 years?

>> No.3607485

so when you say "scientific" literature you actually mean not scientific literature? then what kind of literature are you talking about?

>> No.3607500

>>3607469

Takes about 10year to attain mastery

>> No.3607501

OP is sickeningly feeble minded and without direction. Disgusting....

>> No.3607553
File: 200 KB, 600x600, 1201407204619.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>capable of spotting intellectual dishonesty
Isn't that just critical thinking? You can do the the second you become a cynic, with whatever level of material you can understand at that point.

>> No.3607618

>derp derp it takes so long to become specialised, no one will isten to you blah blah
> I blame the Anglos

What?

>> No.3607705

>>3607469

then, how does the universe work?

>> No.3608435

>>3607454
>Then you're capable of spotting intellectual dishonesty a mile away
>I mainly blame Anglos

Wow, you weren't kidding!