[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

File: 4 KB, 300x191, sci.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

[ERROR]

Anonymous Mon Aug 22 00:02:22 2011 No.3605777 [Reply] [Original]

Aren't yo supposed to divide before you add?

>>	Anonymous Mon Aug 22 00:03:22 2011 No.3605782 I don't know, you tell me.

>>	Anonymous Mon Aug 22 00:04:22 2011 No.3605784 >>3605777 devide 20/4 + 20/6

>>	Anonymous Mon Aug 22 00:04:22 2011 No.3605785 The way I learned it in school was using GEMDAS, with G = grouping. So the 4+6 is supposed to be grouped together.

>>	Anonymous Mon Aug 22 00:06:22 2011 No.3605787 >>3605784 I did the thing below is the hint it gave me.

>>	Anonymous Mon Aug 22 00:11:22 2011 No.3605803 In that form it's implied it's 20/(4+6) rather than 20/4+6.

>>	Anonymous Mon Aug 22 00:12:22 2011 No.3605804 >>3605785 Hahahaha. Faggot don't know math.

>>	Anonymous Mon Aug 22 00:13:22 2011 No.3605811 File: 7 KB, 251x190, 1303125623704.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>3605785 LOL are you in elementary school or what. Good trolling attempt though, you got me answering 7/10

>>	Anonymous Mon Aug 22 00:15:22 2011 No.3605816 >>3605811 >>3605804 except he's right

>>	Anonymous Mon Aug 22 00:15:22 2011 No.3605818 <span class="math"> \frac{20}{4+6} = 20 \div 4 + 6 = 5 + 6 = 11 [/spoiler] There is no grouping here in the initial expression given. You cannot assume it is <span class="math">\frac{20}{(4 + 6 )}[/spoiler] faggots.

>>	Anonymous Mon Aug 22 00:16:22 2011 No.3605821 >>3605816 Except he's not.

>>	Anonymous Mon Aug 22 00:17:22 2011 No.3605823 >>3605816 except you're probably retarded.

>>	Anonymous Mon Aug 22 00:18:22 2011 No.3605826 >>3605803 >>3605816 [citation needed]

>>	Anonymous Mon Aug 22 00:18:22 2011 No.3605827 File: 35 KB, 483x322, 1313876459579.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>3605816 you must be new here

>>	Anonymous Mon Aug 22 00:25:22 2011 No.3605844 >>3605803 according to khan academy this is right but that is very confusing.

>>	Anonymous Mon Aug 22 00:26:22 2011 No.3605847 using a bar for division is equivalent to putting both the top and bottom in parentheses

>>	Anonymous Mon Aug 22 00:28:22 2011 No.3605855 File: 133 KB, 246x247, 1311113259788.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>3605844 >>3605847

>>	Anonymous Mon Aug 22 00:30:22 2011 No.3605864 >>3605855 I am OP and the thing below the initial question is the hint, so therefore khan academy says that was the right way.

>>	Anonymous Mon Aug 22 00:31:22 2011 No.3605868 >>3605864 I really don't know how to react to that. How old are you, btw?

>>	Anonymous Mon Aug 22 00:32:22 2011 No.3605870 File: 193 KB, 1400x815, 1313933186383.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >It's right, because Khan Academy told me so.

>>	Anonymous Mon Aug 22 00:35:22 2011 No.3605876 >>3605868 inb4 12

>>	Anonymous Mon Aug 22 00:35:22 2011 No.3605878 ITT: 90% samefag calling correct answers trolls. /sci/ will still fall for it.

>>	Anonymous Mon Aug 22 00:35:22 2011 No.3605880 >>3605864 >use Khan academy >(and) use your brain >and fail pick two

>>	Anonymous Mon Aug 22 00:36:22 2011 No.3605886 File: 28 KB, 350x297, 1313454117676.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>3605878 this is a scientific debate, gtfo.

>>	Anonymous Mon Aug 22 00:39:22 2011 No.3605895 >>3605878 ITT: this person trolling with a wrong answer.

>>	Anonymous Mon Aug 22 00:39:22 2011 No.3605896 So how do we know when its implied and when its not?

>>	Anonymous Mon Aug 22 00:41:22 2011 No.3605903 >>3605896 I suppose you'll just have to take your textbook and read it with your bineuclidians to do divisions.