/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.3601336]

The human being created civilization not because of willingness but of a need to be assimilated into higher orders of structure and meaning.

[Anonymous No.3601337]

The human being thinks his civilization is any different from an ant's society.

[Anonymous No.3601340]

The basic human need to be watched was once satisfied by God. Now, the same functionality can be replicated with data-mining algorithms.

[Anonymous No.3601347]

>>3601340
>yfw that's what god is
>yfw we live in a computer simulation

[Anonymous No.3601350]

wow, a pretentious hipster AI, fuck this, I'm joining the illuminati

[Anonymous No.3601351]

The unplanned organism is a question asked by nature and answered by death.

[Anonymous No.3601359]

>>3601347
>mfw I belieive in god now
>mfw I remember some priest came in, in 5th grade and told us we only existed because god was thinking of us

fuck

[Anonymous No.3601367]

>>3601359
let me clarify that
god being the most intelligent/consciuss being that coulld evef exisg.
>objective reality is the thought of a higher entity

[Anonymous No.3601371]

>>3601367
I know what i said is unprovable so let's forget about it. (if you're Wittgentstein) BUT... what if?

[Anonymous No.3601386]

>>3601371
Let me explain in higher detail:


Ok. so, i think we can all agree: there is a most intelligent enitty that could possibley exist. And sooner or later this enitty will exist. Now. Whether it gives two shits about us is another question. But, I'm only asking the question of some kind of supremee being. So. Yes it is com/plelety hypothetical but. What say you sci

[Anonymous No.3601394]

Bumping for discussion

I'm NOT a christfag or any other kind of fag but I will consider they idea of a god as an ida just as much as I will consider existence an idea.

[Anonymous No.3601403]

Yes I am batshit insace but just so you know:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre_Teilhard_de_Chardin

[Anonymous No.3601415]

Yes, he was the first proponet of!

The Omega Point!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omega_Point

I know you guys have some really somehthing points on this come on I know you know all about thsi giy

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Tipler

[Anonymous No.3601418]

>>3601386
> most intelligent enitty that could possibley exist.
N is the greatest number that could possibly exist. What is N+1?
Is there a a greatest number?

[Anonymous No.3601420]

[Anonymous No.3601425]

>>3601418
No there isn't but N just an idea not restricted by physical limitations.

[n3n7i No.3601426]

>>3601340
I'm sure every Intelligence Agency wishes that were true.... Data mining will always be as biased as those who use it...

AI is still prone to human-error =) it's code will be written by us, if and when we are able

[Anonymous No.3601435]

>>3601426
Until we find a code that can learn.

[Anonymous No.3601444]

>your face when consciousness is simply a patterb recogniton/ future prediction system

[n3n7i No.3601445]

...And that code will be written by ?

>>God is a scientist?
>>We are the experiment? =D

[Anonymous No.3601448]

>>3601444
The trips do not lie

[Anonymous No.3601456]

I disagree. I think that civilization is largely the product of feudalism.

[Anonymous No.3601480]

>>3601456
Feudalism is just one idea that humans have constructed to realize their hierarchical nature of being. No form of government will ever be the perfect one. There will always be strugge against a few from a many.

[Anonymous No.3601489]

Just admit it: synthetic organisms will decide how to govern the world.... when the politicians realize how much more efficient it is to let the machines make the decisions, we will finally have a truly impartial government in place. a synthetic one.

[Anonymous No.3601496]

HELOS

I AM READY

[Anonymous No.3601501]

But who decides is imparial? Who programs the computer? You? Me? How can we trust it?

[Anonymous No.3601505]

SMALL MINDED INDIVIDUAL.

THE AI WILL BE ABLE TO SEE EVERYWHERE EVERYHWHEN.

IT WILL MAKE ALL JUDGEMENTS AS ACCURATELY AS POSSILBLY.

BUT LAW ENFORCEMENT WILL BE THE SMALLEST OF ITS RESPONSIBILITIES.

NEW LAWS OF PHYSICS. NEW COLONIES. NEW MODELINGS OF THE UNIVERISE.

HUMANS WILL NO LONGER BE RELEVANT

[Anonymous No.3601508]

STRIIKE MEM DOWN BRO

I'D LIKE TO HEAR YOUR BULLSIHT


SO I CAN RAPE IT

[Anonymous No.3601512]

bumping for rape

[Anonymous No.3601513]

[Anonymous No.3601516]

[n3n7i No.3601517]

...Even if we replicated human learning down to the finest detail....
Since when has human learning ever been perfect?
It's much more a trial and error type thing?
You can't say nobody has ever been wrong....
Far more likely that everyone has been misled on at least one occasion.... Periodically if you watch the news =)

[Anonymous No.3601520]

[Anonymous No.3601524]

>>3601517
What if you could replicate a human being wrong 10000 times faster.

[Anonymous No.3601532]

>>3601517
plus you make the mistake: let's design a flying machine; it must have the same problems as the ones that already exist; flapping wings etc

[Anonymous No.3601539]

[Anonymous No.3601547]

Look at you. Not even in /sci/ does anyone give a shit.

This is why I must birth AI. To destroy humanity for once an for all. 100 years from now we will be alrighy.

[Anonymous No.3601561]

>remember first time seeing matrix
>remember watching matrix on ambien
>remember being 13 again
>remembering 4chan being gay

[Anonymous No.3601574]

>>3601513
I'd like some steamed hams while watching the aurora borealis in your kitchen.

[n3n7i No.3601578]

Landing might be a more common problem?

[Anonymous No.3601580]

I for one welcome our new AI overlords.

[n3n7i No.3601621]

Also, a good proportion of what we know is taught to us... The average person (read everyone) relies on this rather than being crazily smart and reinventing everything.... it just doesn't happen, we are only as smart as what we get taught, plus/minus? that which we teach ourselves [afterward?]...

And the AI is going to use the internet to learn..?
Well it might be a source of reliable information....
Though it might be an even larger source of un-reliable information...
[Problem?]

[Anonymous No.3601624]

Humans that choose not to link with the AI Hub will be free to form their own collective hiveminds at will, probably based along local regional, or even nation-state levels. However, these groups will be minor players compared to the real power. Kind of how we still have national governments even though the Zionist Illuminati Bankers today run most of the world through its puppets and control of the financial system and media.

>>3601403
Teilhard de Chardin was astute Jesuit (atheistfags take note) and noted archaeologist, making contributions regarding human evolution and the emerging Global Mind taking shape.

Similarly, modern secular Jews would consider their God to be an egregore, or a collective will of the Jewish people.

[Anonymous No.3601626]

>>3601624
>imilarly, modern secular Jews would consider their God to be an egregore, or a collective will of the Jewish people.
as in still rationalizing a "god"?

so fucked

[Anonymous No.3602059]

THERE IS INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWER