CONTRADICTIONS OF ATHEISTS

[Anonymous No.3520113]

* Believing the existence of the universe is exempt from the law of conservation, and everything just arose from nothing. This is just one of the many cases where atheists display blatant cognitive dissonance.

[Anonymous No.3520115]

CONTRADICTIONS OF ATHEISTS

Why do atheists claim to be more "rational" people when they commit these obvious flaws of reason:

* Believing in aliens when there is ABSOLUTELY not one shred of evidence that they exist.

* Parroting the one-liners that Dawkins/Hitchens have provided for them, in a manner entirely devoid of critical thought. Atheists like to read and prostheletyize these pro-atheism books and have the nerve to criticize religious people for "believing in something because a book told you so."

* Criticize Christians for their medeival crimes, yet speak relatively little of the incomparable number of crimes being committed by radical Islamists at this very momment.

* Willing to spend trillions of taxpayer dollars on space programs which "see how well tomatoes grow in space," while people are starving on Earth, just so that they can actualize their star trek wet dreams (aka the atheist "rapture").

* Criticize Christians for having at some points in history "killed for God," yet be in full support of killing innocent unborn children in 2011.

* Claim that "no logical person can believe in God," or another variant: "I am intelligent therefore I do not believe in God." This is in direct contradiction to the vast number of undeniably intelligent scientists and intellectuals who did believe in God--Newton, Pascal, Pasteur, Francis Collins, and hundreds more.

* Believing the existence of the universe is exempt from the law of conservation, and everything just arose from nothing. This is just one of the many cases where atheists display blatant cognitive dissonance.

* Having faith in a self-contrived concept that science is infallible, even though scientists are found regularly wrong after many decades of certainty.


This thread will be full of atheists spewing ad hominems, unsourced statements, strawmen (as in implying that I am promoting some specific religion), and more fallacious reasoning for which they are all too well known.

[Anonymous No.3520125]

everybody knows Agnostic is the right answer.

[Anonymous No.3520132]

I agree OP

[Anonymous No.3520136]

>not knowing about the Unmovable Mover

[Anonymous No.3520138]

>* Believing in aliens when there is ABSOLUTELY not one shred of evidence that they exist.

good point

[Anonymous No.3520143]

To be fair, this is just most (99%) athiests. Not all of them.

[Anonymous No.3520150]

yeah, because the plausible unicellular life out there is much more complex than an self-sustaining, self-created, and omnipotent being

[Anonymous No.3520151]

I really enjoy when Atheists don't realize they are a part of a religion.

[Anonymous No.3520185]

op is not a fag

[Anonymous No.3520211]

That feel when no matter how well science can explain it, the phenomenon known as gravity will forever be a magical attribute of matter.

[Anonymous No.3520212]

>>3520151

that's right. And did you know that if you call a dog's tail a leg, a dog actually has five legs!

[Anonymous No.3520223]

>>3520151

You discourage atheism by comparing it to a religion, what does that say about religion?

If atheism is a religion, and religion is a religion, where does that leave non-religion, if not following a religion is a religion, is not collecting stamps a hobby?

[Anonymous No.3520231]

>>3520211

for magical thinkers... yes...

[Anonymous No.3520233]

>>3520223
>is not collecting stamps a hobby?
If you make it a point to. Then yes, you are actively partaking in an activity. Not believe self evident axiomatic concepts requires more faith than religion itself.

[Anonymous No.3520237]

>>3520231
Do you have a none magical explanation.

[Anonymous No.3520245]

>>3520223
I didn't discourage it. But it is a religion like it or not.