[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 509 KB, 1600x900, 1312141693604.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3500112 No.3500112 [Reply] [Original]

Does being gullible have any correlation to intelligence?

>> No.3500138

Depends, you can be gullible because you are ignorant or because you are too trusting and it is just a personality trait.

>> No.3500139

yes, now go be gullible and stupid somewhere else

>> No.3500156

yes and the science of this statement is... this is my new desktop thanks :3

>> No.3500186

>>3500138
Isn't it possible that trust and ignorance go hand in hand?
Intelligence and cynicism seem to have a pretty strong link.

>> No.3500315

>>3500186
>Intelligence and cynicism seem to have a pretty strong link.
Its a facade. People think being a cynic makes them smart. I know far too many people like this.

>>3500138
This guy has it.

>> No.3500323

How do you quantify gullibility?

>> No.3500331

>>3500323
I don't think you can... hmm... Good question

>> No.3500367

>>3500315
i believe you are wrong

anyone who thinks they're smart is an idiot. intelligence is a correlation between facts. gullibility is more akin to belief, a hasty decision in light of insufficient facts or none at all.

you can make a choice to accept a cetain understanding based on the facts gathered thus far, but only gullible people make a decision based on someone else;s opinion of what these facts conclude

lrn2notbe12yearsold

>> No.3500373

>>3500323
not all things that count can be counted, not all things that can be counted count

once a word can be used in the correct context and has qualitative properties, the quantification has already been embedded in your brain long before the metrics are derived to create the formulas you're looking for which will inevitably prove what you already know (unless you're a subjective son of a bitch)

>> No.3500376

not necessarily, if you are talking about every day little things. but in the big issues, I think so.

>> No.3500388

>>3500373
>qualitative
I seriously hope you don't mean critical theory.

>> No.3500393

Define intelligence first, okay?

>> No.3500399

>>3500393
define defining first, okay

>> No.3500401

>>3500399
de·fine/diˈfīn/Verb
1. State or describe exactly the nature, scope, or meaning of.
2. Give the meaning of (a word or phrase), esp. in a dictionary.

>> No.3500404

>>3500401
thanks