[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 297 KB, 1024x768, pulsar3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3478526 No.3478526 [Reply] [Original]

Will the multiverse eventually 404?

>> No.3478555

>>3478526
>multiverse
go back to reading comic books

>> No.3478560

>404
already done
you'll never find it

>> No.3478571

>Kaku_stringtroll.jpeg

>> No.3478585

>>3478555
>Imagination is more important than knowledge

>> No.3478586

>>3478585
no it isn't

>> No.3478592

>>3478585
He didn't say knowledge isn't important.

>>3478555
Multiverses are physical possibilities that are studied in peer reviewed academic articles.

>> No.3478603

>>3478592
multiverses are metaphysical possibilities not physical ones

>> No.3478631

>>3478603
10 years ago and I would've agreed with you. Some theories that predict multiverses are becoming empirically testable via LHC and related experiments.

>> No.3478632

>>3478603
I think you haven't a clue
>how many universes there are
>how many there were before this one

If you do KNOW please share this information

>> No.3478638

>>3478631
bah, those theories have perfectly good not "magic" based explanations, just not as "elegant".

>> No.3478646

>>3478632
1 and who cares.

>> No.3478657

>>3478646
Why isn't 'who cares' your answer to all questions?

>> No.3478662

>>3478638
There isn't room in this world for ugly physics, mate. Hehe

>> No.3478663

>>3478657
because, it's not the answer to all questions, but it is the answer to that question.

>> No.3478670

For all intensive purposes, there is only one universe.

>> No.3478680

>>3478670
>for all intensive purposes
>intensive
Please stop helping me.

>> No.3478679

>>3478670
Intensive purposes? I think you meant "For all intents and purposes"

>> No.3478690

No 404 for universe...
universe is eternal...
life in universe temporary phenomenon.

>> No.3478701

>Multiverse

I bet you believe in free will too.

>> No.3478711

>>3478663
But both questions are similar? How many there are and how many there were are related. You say there is only 1 and you don't care how many there were? You didn't answer that question with the same certainty as the first.

>> No.3478717

>>3478701
OP here
I don't believe in free will nor do I believe in a Multiverse.

>> No.3478718

>>3478711
they're similar but different. Thus they call for different answers.

>> No.3479240

HI I AM MICHIO KAKU, BUY MY BOOK ON UNTESTABLE THEORIES AND LISTEN TO MY RADIO SHOW WHERE I INTERVIEW ACTIVITS.

tl;dr NEVER.

>> No.3479400

Probably Dumb.... But are there three dimensions of time?

>> No.3479450

yes, and it did.

>> No.3479483

>>3478526

Yes..assuming they exist...and if they exist...they already 404ed...you just happen to not have gotten there yet.

Your question is time related and we as humans perceive time as patches of reality that begin and end instead of just ourselves kinda passing trough time coordenates.

>> No.3479508

>>3478526
>Eventually
That implies time. Time is a dimension specific to our universe. The multiverse has no laws other than logical consistency.

>> No.3479547

>>3479400
Yes and no. Time is not a dimension it is a serial measurement of the distance between entropic states. This is why there is no 'time' before the big bang.

>> No.3479554

Eg Space Travel <> Time Travel...

Therefore 3D of just Space-Time is silly?

>> No.3479619

...Say i move really slowly from Point A to point B....
then really fast from point B back to point A....

Space travelled <> Time travelled ? because I can move at different speeds....

...Like i said, it's probably dumb =)

>> No.3479644

>>3479547
>not a dimension
OH U :3

>> No.3479648

>>3479554
We're traveling through time right now, or rather, we're traveling along an entropic path with deterministic behavior relative to our dimensional reference points. As our reference points are stretched (increase in speed of travel) the distance between entropic events increases - thus we see the clock of the traveler as having decelerated in time while the traveler sees no change (at least until he decelerates).

>> No.3479932
File: 16 KB, 688x513, time.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3479932

...Does / Could(?) time have more dimensions than space(Eg. 4D)?

Isn't that basically what relativity amounts to?

Eg (pic) no matter how fast or slow c travels to d... Its still in the same time relative to a & b?