[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 3 KB, 480x400, pcgraphpng.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3460805 No.3460805 [Reply] [Original]

Lets see where /sci/ stands..

http://www.politicalcompass.org

Economic Left/Right: -0.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.44

>> No.3460818

inb4 everyone is left liberal

>> No.3460822

We've done this before. Most people are lower-left quadrant, but also say the test is biased.

>> No.3460824

bump for inrerest

>> No.3460833

>implying right liberal isn't god tier

>> No.3460850

People should be able to do whatever the fuck they want at home

giving people economic freedom is another way of saying economic anarchy - I.E. biggest and baddest stay biggest and baddest deal with it.

thats my viewpoint. I just want shit to work, I want technology to continue to progress and I don't want manipulative fucks buying everyone and ruining the planet.

libertarian with reservations about human interest.

>> No.3460876
File: 3 KB, 480x400, politicalcompassjuly27.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3460876

Herpaderp.

I like how they managed to test Stalin AND Ghandi with this.

>> No.3460900
File: 7 KB, 482x407, political compass.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3460900

come at me bro

>> No.3460902
File: 3 KB, 480x400, pcgraphpng.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3460902

I'm like a square to the right of Gandhi's estimate

>> No.3460907

>>3460850
>libertarian

How's it feel being so hipster?

>> No.3460910

>>3460900

>Zeitgeistfag detected

>> No.3460922

>>3460910
More like rational and compassionate idea of the world.

>> No.3460923

Socialist libertarian here, strain the black flag and slit throats!

>> No.3460930

>>3460822

Reality has a liberal bias.

>> No.3460956
File: 3 KB, 480x400, pcgraphpng.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3460956

feels rebellious man

>> No.3460958
File: 3 KB, 480x400, pcgraphpng.php.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3460958

>>3460900
I am you

>> No.3460971
File: 3 KB, 480x400, pcgraphpng.php.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3460971

the test is shit with stupid questions.

oh well.

>> No.3460976

>>3460922
>compassionate
yea, i believe your heart is in the right place.

>rational
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>> No.3460983

I got slightly left and near the bottom.

I don't think that describing political beliefs in two dimensions tells you much, though.

>> No.3460988

I liked the questions about abstract art and not thinking about your problems.

>> No.3460989

>>3460983
yes it does.

>> No.3460991
File: 44 KB, 500x691, anders_behring_breivik_podozrivy_utok_teror_norsko_11_dailymail.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3460991

Cultural Marxists everywhere!

>> No.3460995

>>3460989

No, it doesn't.

>> No.3460999

>>3460995
yes it does.

>> No.3461004

>>3460999

No. It does not.

>> No.3461007

>>3460983

- economic freedom
- social freedom

what more axes do you propose?

>> No.3461008

>>3461004
yes it does.

>> No.3461011

>>3461004
yes, it does

>> No.3461015

>>3461008
>>3461011

Nay, it does not.

>> No.3461018

>>3461015
yes it does.

>> No.3461022

>>3461015
but it does. locked. throwed the key into a lake.

>> No.3461034
File: 3 KB, 467x416, pol.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3461034

>> No.3461036
File: 3 KB, 480x400, aahderp.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3461036

"Mothers may have careers, but their first duty is to be homemakers."
Tee-hee

>> No.3461037

>>3461007
>what more axes do you propose?

The problem is not "not enough dimensions," it is describing things dimensionally in the first place. If I'm militantly anti-abortion and militantly anti-war on drugs, that would put me in the same place on the "social freedom" access as someone who is totally indifferent to both. And that's even without getting into people having the same position on a given issue for completely different reasons. The whole thing is absurd.

>> No.3461042

>>3461037

Um, axis. Axis is what I meant.

>> No.3461045

>>3461018
>>3461022

I'm afraid not, sir.

>> No.3461067

>>3460833
the hell is "right liberal"?

you mean libertarian?

>> No.3461074

>>3461067
i mean, in the lower right square*.

"libertarian" applied to the whole lower section. my bad.

>> No.3461075

If your political views do not tend towards centre/centre-left libertarianism then your political views are wrong (unless you're ok with being a selfish dick, in which case i guess i can't say they're wrong, but you are a selfish dick).

>> No.3461082
File: 3 KB, 480x400, pcgrgaphpng.php.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3461082

>> No.3461084

>>3461075
>(unless you're ok with being a selfish dick, in which case i guess i can't say they're wrong, but you are a selfish dick).

i'm just selfish. although you can throw in "inhumane" or some shit like that i guess.

>> No.3461085
File: 3 KB, 480x400, oh noes.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3461085

>> No.3461089

>>3461082
you know...I'm actually pretty socially conservative too....

>> No.3461106
File: 3 KB, 480x400, pcgraphpng.php.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3461106

>> No.3461110

>>3461037
>militantly anti-abortion

so you would kill to stop an abortion?

fullretard.jpg

>> No.3461113

so what does it mean if your dot is towards the bottom left corner? i has confused.
seems like a decent amount of people that posted are like that

>> No.3461123

>>3461113

it means you're a hipster faggot who smokes pot all day

>> No.3461125

>>3461113
it means you believe it's okay to force people with wealth to cater to the needs of the poor.

enjoy being as evil as republicans that send troops to iraq to die.

>> No.3461133

>>3461113

It means you are a socialist (leftwing).

>> No.3461136

>>3461123

hey, i don't smoke pot ALL day >:(

>> No.3461137

has anyone tried retaking the test but only choosing the "strongly" options?

i did and my dot moved further up and to the right.

but ideally my dot would be as far down and to the right as possible. i don't like the way the questions are phrased.

>> No.3461151
File: 3 KB, 480x400, politicalcompass.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3461151

Well, would you look at that.

>> No.3461154
File: 3 KB, 480x400, pcgraphpng.php.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3461154

welp...

>> No.3461158
File: 42 KB, 643x595, Your Political Compass 27July2011.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3461158

Welp, about what I expected, however I didn't like the way the survey formed some of their questions. Though attempting to sound neutral, I believe it's agenda were to fish for and exploid predominantly liberal results. It did this by detailing a neutral, inspecific question for Liberal-related questions so it sounds reasonable, while then over simplifying Conservative-based questions so it sounds unreasonable.

Then again, asking these questions, followed by a detailed explination from the participating member would be a more accurate means of performing this test (although it's impossible for a simple survey, it's the right way of doing it).

Example:

"Is it ok to spank your children for the sake of discipline?"

Yes, however it's also important for the spanker to communicate why their child is getting spanked, so the child can associate (Insert bad action here) with negative consequence through physical pain (aka spanking). This way, when they grow older and actually become suseptible to societies' consequences which could ruin their lives if wrongfully done, they have developed at an early age to respect, or if nothing more tolerate, not doing something that would receive punishment. A simple "Strongly Disagree" to "Strongly Agree" is unacceptable, and non-representing.

Maybe I'm looking too much into it. It did the best with what it had.

>> No.3461200

I will love to see all the capitalist retards cry and cry when the socialist revolution shows itself as the path to human greatness.
Cry more, faggots.

>> No.3461225

>>3461200

Yes of course.

Socialism is what's gonna bring enlightened happiness amongst the masses, especially in America.

You are right and in time the real world will prove you so.

>> No.3461233

>>3461225

Nah, America has no chance. Everywhere else in the world though will prosper.

>> No.3461235

>>3461158

Or perhaps conservatives are just unreasonable.

>> No.3461253

>>3461225
I think America will reach socialism thru civil war, and i don't think it's too far away, like less than twenty years.

>> No.3461256
File: 30 KB, 386x355, Snimka.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3461256

And now this one:
http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz

its just 10 questions..

>> No.3461257

>>3461158
That feel when by the time you have kids spanking them with be punishable by death

>> No.3461261
File: 10 KB, 200x200, weeeeell.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3461261

>>3461235

>verifying his point

>> No.3461286

>>3461158
>Yes, however it's also important for the spanker to communicate why their child is getting spanked, so the child can associate (Insert bad action here) with negative consequence through physical pain


hahahaha shut the fuck up. no physical abuse (and that's what hitting is, since it involuntarily causes pain) is necessary.

>> No.3461318
File: 9 KB, 509x481, imaginethat.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3461318

Who would have guessed.

>> No.3461328

If you have emphaty and simphaty for the production of knowledge better than profit, then you are a socialist. If not, you are capitalist and should be punish for selfishness.

>> No.3461333
File: 3 KB, 480x400, pcgraph.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3461333

>mfw I'm Nader.

>> No.3461355

>>3461261
>>3461333
nice face you have

i was -3.75, -3.74
basically the Dali Lama

i wonder how mad china is at me.

>> No.3461362
File: 3 KB, 480x400, pcgraphpng.php.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3461362

AmICoolNow?

>> No.3461371
File: 3 KB, 480x400, pcgraphpng[1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3461371

heres mine

everyone too far off the mid is ignorant

>> No.3461402
File: 91 KB, 1218x508, 123.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3461402

Yes, I'm a Libertarian.

>> No.3461452
File: 3 KB, 480x400, pcgraphpng.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3461452

>>3461371
This guy is spot on.

>> No.3461479
File: 3 KB, 480x400, pcgraphpng.php.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3461479

This is where I was prior to going to college.

>> No.3461483
File: 3 KB, 480x400, april72011.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3461483

This is me after going to college (and I am still in college)

>> No.3461485
File: 3 KB, 487x407, political2011-07-27.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3461485

>>3460805
Hm, current, I've gotten more to the left.

>> No.3461486

>>3461479
>>3461483
That explains why you have such a biased worldview, you have been brainwashed.

>> No.3461490

>>3461486

How does that suggest Ive been brainwashed?

How is my "worldview" biased?

>> No.3461493

>>3461486
What?
We have all been brainwashed since birth.

>> No.3461506

For reference:

Bottom right: economic freedom, social freedom
Bottom left: no economic freedom, social freedom
Top left: no economic freedom, no social freedom
Top right: no social freedom, economic freedom

>> No.3461510
File: 88 KB, 360x351, deal with it.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3461510

Highly liberal thought Correlates with IQ. And people who mean well but are right wing don't understand that private tyrannical caused by undemocratic economic forces are nearly as bad as the authoritarian dictatorships.

Green FTW

>> No.3461511

>>3461490
You went to college trusting less in capitalism and out more, thus you have been manipulated to defend this flawed system.

>> No.3461516
File: 18 KB, 250x245, 1300044776986..jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3461516

>2011
>having an Authoritarian/Libertarian score of >-5.00

>> No.3461518

>>3461506
Oh fuck no, get away faggot, no one wants your siniester worldview.
And still you haven not given me that last option from last night.

>> No.3461526

>>3461506
>Thinks 1 man owning 1 billion dollars and having economic power over thousands is freedom.

Libertarian socialism is expanding democracy to the workplace, so fullretard managers can't be assholes to get a bonus without the majoirty support.

>> No.3461530
File: 3 KB, 480x400, pcgraphpng.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3461530

anarcho-commie here

can someone explain this one:
>When you are troubled, it's better not to think about it, but to keep busy with more cheerful things.

>> No.3461533

>>3461511

Two things:

I dont think my education in economics has consisted of professors talking about how glorious capitalism is. That isnt what my education has been able.

Second of all, I dont think I sit around here defending capitalism. Nor do I really think I favor it more or less than before I entered college. I'd say, I spend an equal amount of time promoting and criticizing free market ideas (which dont equate to capitalism I think).

>> No.3461536

>>3461518

That is the actual description of the quadrants.

Link to what I did not answer.

>> No.3461538

>>3461530
Sticking to the status quo, basically being in red or blue, more blue though

/b/rofist , libsoc/libcom here

>> No.3461546

>>3461530

>>When you are troubled, it's better not to think about it, but to keep busy with more cheerful things.

Fuck that shit!

>> No.3461547

>>3461526

>2011
> thinking democracy does not mean majority force rule

I hope you are not doing this.

>> No.3461551

>>3461536
It has already 404'd, for your convenience.
And stop thinking that your definitions of systems are correct, because there are not. You don't understand how capitalism, socialism or anarchism works.

>> No.3461559

>>3461547
Not if the majority is brainwashed by the corrupted media, then it's not fair.

>> No.3461564

>>3461506
>>3461536
>>3461547

where do you score liberty

>> No.3461565

>>3461551

What did you want answered?

Stop thinking your personal and emotional hopes of what capitalism and socialism is, are accurate, factual, logical, or rational.

>> No.3461593

>>3461565
You are the one with emotional hopes that capitalism is working, or maybe is that you make profit of it, which would explain a lot of things.
But for more than 90% of the world, capitalism does not work and you definitions are flawed.

>> No.3461610

I wish there was a "Don't give a shit" option.

Multinational companies are unethically exploiting the plant genetic resources of developing countries.

They might be, but I don't really care.

>> No.3461625

>>3461564

Extreme bottom right.

>> No.3461629

>>3461593

Capitalism isn't practiced anywhere, so that would be impossible.

>> No.3461634

>>3461625
fuck yes my brother.


>>3460971

>> No.3461637
File: 3 KB, 480x400, pcgraphpng.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3461637

>> No.3461641

>>3461634

Good to see support for Liberty. It is very rare on this board.

>> No.3461644

>>3461625
I wanted your exact values.

>> No.3461645

>>3461530
i strongly disagreed. your feelings are trying to tell you something is wrong.

and if something is wrong, you should find out what it is and change it.

>> No.3461664

>>3461641
Your use of the word liberty as a trip disgusts me. Conservatism can never be pro-liberty.

>> No.3461669

>>3461664

How do you define conservatism?

>> No.3461680

Economic Left/Right: -9.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.77

>> No.3461701

Politics, like culture, beliefs and history, aren't two-dimensional. You graphs are invalid.

Stop trying to fit in. If you want to define yourself, do it yourself.

>> No.3461708

>>3461669
I'm glad you asked.

Conservatism: Holding to traditional attitudes and values while being cautious about change or innovation, typically in relation to politics and religion.

An example of a conservative opinion: Homosexuals should not marry. This is not very liberal. Am I wrong?

>> No.3461719
File: 155 KB, 599x602, 1274208478659.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3461719

>>3461701

Finally!

>> No.3461726

>>3461641
some of the questions were a bit fishy to me.

like the one asking whether the interests of the corporations or the people were more important.

i answered "people", but the interests of big business in a free market (to a lesser degree, a corporatist market) would benefit that of the people.

>> No.3461731

>>3461708

Given that vague definition, I am not a follower of conservatism.

In terms of marriage, the state has no part in marriage. Marriage is a contract between two individuals. I do not support any state banning marriage contracts between people. Keep in mind, faggots are not banned from marrying, they are simply not allowed to get government approval. I repeat, it is NOT illegal for fags to marry.

>> No.3461735

>>3461726

>i answered "people", but the interests of big business in a free market (to a lesser degree, a corporatist market) would benefit that of the people

I dont believe free markets imply better-ness. Free markets have the potential to fail.

>> No.3461750
File: 509 KB, 1000x1409, fannykaplan.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3461750

>>3461719
Go away, you obtuse leninist.

>> No.3461755

>>3461731
The definition is supposed to be vague. I am not talking about the conservative movement in the United states, but conservatism as a general ideology.

It follows that you would consider yourself a libertarian, yes? Because if so I have no quarrel with you.

>> No.3461756

Heh, the questions were bad. I ended up halfway down and half way to the right when I'm an anarchist.

>> No.3461761

>>3461756

Thats tough taking these when you are an anarchist. I remember when I was in high school, in AP government. We took a test like this. I was an anarchist at the time. I got "Moderate Conservative." I remember I raised my hand and just told the teacher I thought the test was wrong and that "anarchist" wasnt an option.

>> No.3461770

>>3461761
haha, similar thing happened to me. as an anarchist i always score as an "extreme conservative".

>> No.3461784
File: 3 KB, 480x400, pcgraphpng.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3461784

"Economically socialist, socially moderate" pretty much sums me up.

>> No.3461789

>>3461750

"The reflection of nature in man’s thought must be understood not lifelessly but in the eternal process of movement, the arising of contradictions and their solution."

MOAR

>> No.3461808

>>3461770
I have left-wing views on economic issues, but despite thinking that I'm socially conservative I always turn up centrist on these tests. Dy'think it's because I'm a britfag and therefore don't understand what real (US) conservatism means ?

>> No.3461814

>>3461789

Did you know Leon Trotsky's ashes were stolen by anarchists and baked into cookies?

Its true.

How does that make you feel?

>> No.3461822

>>3461814
Great anecdote, and i'm not even a full anarchist.

>> No.3461839
File: 150 KB, 500x500, 130087784650.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3461839

>>3461814

Lol. Seriously, this is just funny, I don't worship him, I just admire his work.

"As long as I breathe I hope. As long as I breathe I shall fight for the future, that radiant future, in which man, strong and beautiful, will become master of the drifting stream of his history and will direct it towards the boundless horizons of beauty, joy and happiness!"

>> No.3461858

>>3461839
His work can be split into two parts. The squashing of any hope to master the drifting stream of history outside of the bolchevik party. The obfuscation of the failures to master the drifting stream of history through the bolchevik party.

>> No.3461860
File: 13 KB, 300x338, lenin.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3461860

>>3461822

And you are trying so hard Lenin is not even amused :/.

>> No.3461873

>>3461858
>implying he didn't save October Revolution, and that the latter would have happened without the bolshevik party.

>> No.3461890

>>3461873
Sure, bolsheviks provoked the october revolution and made it through. That doesn't change the fact that they also provoked its failure.
Maybe a revolution in may would have gone further.

>> No.3461902

>>3461839


I also liked that Trotsky once said that communism without democracy is impossible.

Whenever people talk about communism and democracy like they are opposite forces fighting each other I like to throw that quote out there.

>> No.3461918

>>3461890

OK, I didn't get your opinion right.
Trotsky wrote a book about the daily life of soviet cityzens, and also the life of the typical member of the Party, describing its bureaucratisation, which was one of the factors which lead to the failure of October, which wasn't predetermined. And as he says, the first lightbulb of Edison wasn't perfect.

(Yes, we know, he didn't invent it.)

>> No.3461927

>>3461918

"freedom of discussion, unity of action."
Do you remember your exact quote? I caoont find it on Wikiquote.

>> No.3462089
File: 3 KB, 480x400, Leftist.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3462089

>>3460971
American Libertarian
>>3461085
Nazi
>>3461158
Republican
>>3461082
Communist
>>3461371
Moderate
>>3461530
Post-left Anarchist

>> No.3462140

>>3461927

I was pretty sure it was "Communism without democracy is impossible" and I thought it was from a book. But I could be wrong.

>> No.3462149

>>3462089

Wait, how is that guy a post-left anarchist? That cant get any more left. Im like the post-left anarchist. Look at me, Im so low yet so not-left.

Also Im not actually an anarchist.

>> No.3462190

>>3462149
I would think post-left anarchists would be as libertarian (south) as possible, like that guy almost is, while still being on the left.
After all the "Left" in this chart is talking about economics not government size.

Post-left means without the authoritarian aspects of socialism.
Anarchy means libertarian on the social scale.

>> No.3462211

>>3462190

I used to be a post-left anarchist. Post-left is just means "Lets not have anything to do with communism or socialism"

Anarchism by its nature is really leftist. Every kind of anarchy is like socialism without authoritarian aspects.

>> No.3462221
File: 3 KB, 480x400, pcgraphpng.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3462221

I'm Gandhi apparently.

>> No.3462226

>>3462211
At the end of the day,
Post-left doesn't really mean anything at all.
What, did they get tired of calling themselves Individualist Anarchists and listening to Max Stirner.
Bob Black is a radical Individualist.

>> No.3462233

>>3462226

Yeah, you are right. None of this stuff means anything. I "used to be" an anarchist. But what that really means is I "used to be" a person who called themselves an anarchist.

>> No.3462250
File: 3 KB, 480x400, politom.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3462250

Social democrat open to the concept of free market capitalism within a sandbox.

>> No.3462331

>>3462211

I think it also involves the immediate destruction of State, without intermediary step, contrary to socialism.

>> No.3462334

>>3462221

Ha. I got the same thing.

>> No.3462336

>>3462211
What about the most plausible system of anarchy, anarcho-capitalism?

>> No.3462346

>>3462336
>plausible
If you mean "possible" then yes. If you mean "Good" then no way. Not at all

Public road systems would break down, the internet would stop working, and the education system outside of a few estabilshments independent of the government would break down. All regulation against false advertising and all safety standards would cease to exist. We'd essentially regress to a point of feudalism, until a theocracy established itself and things got moving again.

>> No.3462414

>>3462346
>he thinks that when you take rocks out of a river, the water still flows around the hole left by the rock.

Obviously if it happened in one day it would be bad. If the government took 20 years, firing everybody slowly, auctioning assets, giving entrepreneurs time to get deals together for replacements, the society would be the most prosperous on earth within a few decades.

>> No.3462436

>>3462414
I really don't see any reason to believe that. I really like the idea of slowly easing into it though; Haven't heard that proposed before.
When we remove regulation in the current US system, recessions and depressions happen due to the lack of integrity within it. I don't understand how it would be possible for this to be avoided, given it would be possible for any corporation to behave fraudulently without any threat of legal reprimand

Also:
What's used in place of currency? There isn't enough gold for a country the size of the US

What do you think would happen when people are raped/murdered? would some kind of fair court come into existence?

>> No.3462440

>>3462436
argh, I used really twice. Sorry :s

>> No.3462456
File: 2 KB, 240x240, 20x34.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3462456

Superior political compass test taker reporting in.

>> No.3462479

Economic Left/Right: -4.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.56

>> No.3462480

Anyone have a three dimensional version?

>> No.3462531
File: 41 KB, 567x505, Capture.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3462531

>/sci/ - leftism

Q: If all scientists have "left" political views, does that make the right wing retarded?

>> No.3462535

>>3462336
Implying that Anarcho-Capitalism would not eventually evolve into Libertarian-ism.
People pay for protection from private police company.
Police company gets so much power that it extorts money from businesses.
Police company becomes new government.

>> No.3462536

>>3461814

That is hilarious given that Trotsky is basically the father of the neoconservative movement.

>> No.3462550

>>3462536
but hes commy

>> No.3462576

>>3462550
A number of Americans who had briefly been Trotskyites as youth rejected the left and became intellectual leaders of conservatism. They include James Burnham (1905–1987), Saul Bellow (1915-2005), Irving Kristol (b. 1920), Gertrude Himmelfarb (b. 1922), and Seymour Martin Lipset (1922-2006).

>> No.3462586

>>3462576
STFu hes a commy bastard

on a more serious note, can someone sympathetic to anarcho-capitalism respond to this?
>>3462436

>> No.3462607

>>3462550

Neoconservatism was born out of the left.

>> No.3462624

>>3462607
are you sure they don't *really* want to distance themselves from the current US right wing? Most new political movements have support from former members of the left wing, counter-authority golf club

>> No.3462632

>>3462624

No, neoconservatives are born from the left, from Trotsky.

>> No.3462633

>>3462607
I think Neoconservatism was influenced just as much if not more from the Nazis and Fascism as it was from Trotskyism.

>> No.3462643

>>3462633

Fascism is the socialist and communists almost perfect wet dream put into action. The National Socialist German Worker's Party simply added in a nationalist aspect.

>> No.3462650

>>3462643
Neoconservatism is regular conservatism with added religious moral law.

>> No.3462651

Economic Left/Right: -4.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.10

Essentially just a little to the right and down of Gandhi.

>> No.3462661

>>3462643
The Nazis were not communists.
"Trade unions were abolished, as well as collective bargaining and the right to strike. The right to quit also disappeared: Labour books were introduced in 1935, and required the consent of the previous employer in order to be hired for another job."

They sure seem Populist!

>> No.3462693

>>3462650

That is obviously the position of a person unfamiliar with neoconservatism past msnbc.

>>3462661

They enforced strict government unions, with wage controls, price controls, etc.

>> No.3462703
File: 3 KB, 480x400, politicalcompass.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3462703

That's right, bitches.

>> No.3462706

>>3462693
Fascism/Neoconservatism/Nazism/Socialism/Trotsky-ism.
correct?

>> No.3462711

Apparently I'm Ghandi.

>> No.3462726
File: 3 KB, 480x400, pcgraphpng.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3462726

>> No.3462735

>>3462693
The difference is, my position is mocking your position towards fascism and socialism.

>> No.3462754
File: 3 KB, 480x400, pcgraphpng.php.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3462754

>> No.3462757
File: 12 KB, 480x400, 1305267693613.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3462757

>> No.3462763

>>3462757
mis-spelt it. The correct term is "soshlesm" and anarchy is a subcategory of it.

>> No.3462764
File: 3 KB, 480x400, pcgraphpng.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3462764

luk im liek gandie

>> No.3462782
File: 14 KB, 300x300, Retard1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3462782

>>3462763
Anarchy = Socialism
So Somalia is the same thing as Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union?

>> No.3462787

>>3462706

Seems true.

>>3462735

It is the literal truth.

>> No.3462788

>>3462782
exactly like it
>>3462787
in a non-literal sense, yes.

>> No.3462792

>>3462782

Somalia has a government.

>> No.3462796

>>3462788

Factually only.

>> No.3462799
File: 3 KB, 480x400, pcgraphpng.php.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3462799

yup

>> No.3462800

libertarian

keep your hands off my shit and I'll keep mine off yours.

>> No.3462802

>>3462796
within the confines of your mind and fox & friends

>> No.3462806

>>3462802

This is the actual truth, it has nothing to do with me.

>> No.3462808

>>3462806
Nope. I'm a socialist, and I disagree. By that fact alone, you are wrong.

>> No.3462812

>>3462808

It is well documented that socialists support theft of labor and are thereby not relevant.

>> No.3462815

>>3462792
The official government does not have control over all of Somalia.
If it did then where do the Pirates dock and trade?

>> No.3462821

>>3462812
That's a completely different (also wrong point). You asserted something. You are wrong. You are too small to admit you are wrong, which I'd consider worse than the error itself.

>> No.3462830
File: 3 KB, 480x400, polticsandstuff.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3462830

I'm sure I'm part of some kind of master-race.

>> No.3462833
File: 53 KB, 1051x994, 1233622373855.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3462833

>>3462812
Why do you use the term "theft of labor"
Don't you mean "theft of capital."
Where did you pick up that term, or did you just make it up?

I ask because theft of labor sounds like Marxism to me, when Marx attacked what he called "Exploitation of labor" by the owners of property.

>> No.3462834

>>3462815

The government of Somalia just this week banned the U.N. from giving food to people inside the country.

>>3462821

Nothing I have said is wrong. And socialists despise economic freedom, and that is why they support theft of labor.

>> No.3462837

>>3462834
I am a socialist
I do not despise ecconomic freedom
I do not agree with the statements you are making
You are wrong.

>> No.3462841

>>3462833

Labor, actual labor. Capital and other labor traded for items are also looked down upon by socialists.

>> No.3462842
File: 335 KB, 310x420, Franco0001.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3462842

this test can be easily demostrated to be bullshit.

Try to score in the upper left hand corner. Basically, it scores general economic lefty positions as socially libertarian, even well... when they aren't.

>> No.3462848

>>3462837

I believe it.

Then you are not a socialist.

Kudos.

Incorrect.

>> No.3462864

>>3462842
the personality types are also all ridiculous. Pretty much the only well known "good guy" on there is Ghandi, and nobody is positioned anywhere near him. At least half of the political spectrum will fall into the category of "like ghandi" in all likelihood.
>>3462848
I'm not willing to continue this discussion, you seem like the kind of person who refuses to learn. It's not your fault, I just can't be of any service to you.

>> No.3462868

>>3462864

I appreciate you giving up.

>> No.3462880

I don't feel like taking it again, but I believe it was something like -10, -9.

>> No.3462888

>>3462833
have a link to that test?

>> No.3462894

>>3462868
Think about it.
You're denying my I believe something I do. You *can't* do that unless you know more about me than I do, which I am almost entirely certain you don't. You're therefore doing this for some other reason.
It could be because you take pride in your beliefs and don't want them challenged. If that's the case, then you clearly want politics to be important to you. By stifling opposition like this, you're making a big mistake and putting pride above rationality.

The fact you disagreed also shows that you think this conversation is important enough for you to reassert your beliefs. I can either be cynical and call that purely egotistical or I can suppose that it's because you want to educate me, in which case explaining what you believe, and why you feel socialism and communism to be kinds of fascism when perfectly put into action, would be a good idea

You're either claiming special knowledge, being intellectually dishonest, or restraining yourself for some other reason.

>> No.3462896

>>3462894
>I am not willing to continue this discussion
You should have stopped there. Anti-Liberty isn't worth your time.

>> No.3462897
File: 19 KB, 119x126, brainfuck.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3462897

>>3462848

>> No.3462898

>>3462894
>socialism
>economic freedom

pick one.

>> No.3462903

>>3462898
>capitalism
>economic freedom
Pick one.

>> No.3462904

>>3462894

If you told me you believed the world was flat, I would do the same. What you believe has no bearing on the truth.

Why would I attempt to point out the flaws in utopian socialism or utopian communism? That would go against the definition of a utopia.

>> No.3462908

>>3462898
A++ Response! /s
>>3462896
Everyone's worth my time. Hopefully, vice-versa.

>> No.3462907 [DELETED] 
File: 14 KB, 381x327, Left-Libertarian.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3462907

>>3462888
That wasn't a test.
But here's another one.

>> No.3462917

>>3462888
That wasn't a test.

>> No.3462918

>>3462904
>If you told me you believed the world was flat, I would do the same. What you believe has no bearing on the truth.
I never asserted that my belief had any bearing on the truth. If you asserted that there are no British people who believe the earth is flat, and I said there were, would you claim I was lying?

>Why would I attempt to point out the flaws in utopian socialism or utopian communism?
I'm not asking you to. I'm asking you to evidence the claim
>Fascism is the socialist and communists almost perfect wet dream put into action.
Which seems sensationalist, hyperbolic, and false.

>> No.3462931

>>3462917
well fuck it and fuck you.

>> No.3462934

>>3462918

Of course not, I do not know.

You said perfectly put into action -- a utopia.

The fact that the National Socialist German Worker's Party shares a lot of political wants with communism and socialism is, well, mere fact.

>> No.3462946
File: 3 KB, 480x400, pcgraphpng.php.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3462946

>> No.3462956

>>3462934
So you admit that by asserting that I wasn't a socialist, and/or that all socialists were fascists, you were wrong. Thanks.

the NSDAP wasn't socialist, it was opposed to both socialism and capitalism (though it took money from capitalists and had the help of a number of corporations). It was initially infiltrated by Hitler as a corporal in the weimar's military, but was then taken over by him and used for different purposes. Socialists, among others, were also taken to concentration camps during the war.

>> No.3462965

>>3462956

Of course not, I was answering the question you asked in the post I responded to. Did you forget you asked one?

>>3462956

The National Socialist German Worker's Party was indeed socialist. They strived for and put into action the public ownership of the means of production. They told businesses what to produce, when to produce, how much to produce, who to sell to, how much to charge, and where to buy goods from. Again, a socialists and communists wet dream.

>> No.3462966

problem with this test is that it assumes you would take political action based off your beliefs.

i don't believe women or niggers are equal to white/asian males, but i support giving them equal rights because i still sympathize with them.

>> No.3462971

>>3462965
hitler got germany out of a depression and became an economic powerhouse.


therefore socialism works.

u mad?

>> No.3462972

>>3462966

That is a very odd position to take.

>> No.3462981

>>3462972
how so?

>> No.3462983
File: 6 KB, 256x106, HP-Gryffindor.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3462983

>>3462931
Try this test.
http://www.thealmightyguru.com/Reviews/HarryPotter/Docs/Quiz-House.html

>> No.3462988

>>3462966
What do you mean by 'not equal'?
Surely there is still the posibility that a woman or black person could contribute to society and should be given the oppertunity to do so?

>> No.3462989

>>3462971

I do not deny that theft of labor can "work" for a short period of time. I am not silly enough to support things that work if they aggress others, or steal the labor of the workers. This is why I do not support socialism.

>> No.3462992

>>3462965
I was assuming that in a convoluted way you had responded, given the two scenarios were Identical.
You assert that all socialists want fascism, I come forward as a socialist and tell you you are wrong, you deny it. I pose a hypothetical situation in which the same thing happens, and you don't deny it. I took that as agreement you had made an honest mistake.
>>3462965
In preparation for war. I have yet to see any reason to doubt that given their stark opposition to communists and usage of concentration camps on far-left political supporters they were anything but far right fascists.

>> No.3462993

>>3462981

I have never heard it before.

>> No.3463004

>>3462988
on average, niggers are definitely more stupid than whites.

there's no evidence to show that women are dumber than men, but based on what i've seen i think it's true.

i don't support equal rights because there's a few women or a few niggers that aren't stupid. i support it because i sympathize with any pain that discriminatory laws could cause.

hell, i sometimes i feel guilty about eating beef or pork.

>> No.3463010

>>3462992

Of course not, I was answering the question you posed, not another question.

You made conflicting statement about your alleged socialism, you said you are one, then changed your mind and said you were against theft of labor. The two are not separable.

The National Socialist German Worker's Party sent rightists, leftists, nazis, commies, etc to concentration camps.

>> No.3463018

>>3462983
Huffelbro master race

>> No.3463025
File: 3 KB, 480x400, pcgraphpng.php.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3463025

This "test" has several biased questions with no real variation of answer choices and not enough of them to balance the broken questions out.

>> No.3463026

>>3463010
Liberty take my test!
>>3462983
What house did the hat put you in?
(Probably Slytherin.)

>> No.3463027

>>3463010
This is the last post I will make untill you re-address the claim you made in >>3462643. I am a socialist. I disagree. You are wrong.
I never said
1) Socialism was the theft of labour
2) I was against the theft of labour
Both were asserted by you.
Also
>NSDAP sent their own to the camps
They didn't send their own to camps because they were their own, they sent them for perceived crimes. Socialists and Communists were sent for being socialists and communists.

>> No.3463029

>>3463019

i got slytherin.
>>3462931

>> No.3463032

>>3463004
There was a large study done by Philippe Rushton that showed men, on average, have about 3.6 IQ points more than women. It makes sense too, because the man throughout history has always had to be the provider(which takes intelligence).

>> No.3463036
File: 3 KB, 480x400, pcgraphpng.php.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3463036

Holy shit.

>> No.3463037

>>3463029
also, i was 1 point off of gryffindor.

>> No.3463039
File: 6 KB, 256x106, HP-Hufflepuff.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3463039

I know, I wanted to get Hufflepuff...
But oh well Gryffindor is good too!

>> No.3463048

>>3463019

I know nothing about Potter. I got the same picture as you.

Gryffindor - 12
Ravenclaw - 12
Hufflepuff - 10
Slytherin - 10

>>3463027

Saying something does not make it true. I think you will agree.

>> No.3463057

>>3463048
I will. Saying that all socialists are fascists does not make that the case, especially when evidence- such as some socialists not being fascists- is present. You've made a mistake, please just own up to it so we can move on. I'm starting to feel sorry for you.

>> No.3463060

>>3463057
why don't you stop replying to him?

"i feel sorry for you" isn't going to ruin his day i don't think.

>> No.3463061

these questions are terrible, and often leading.

just one lame question:

>Abstract art that doesn't represent anything shouldn't be considered art at all.

DURR

and no, I don't mean you are retarded if you put x answer, I mean you are retarded if you think this question makes sense.

and I am not that arty

>> No.3463065

>>3463060
Because I'm not trying to win, I'm trying to help. It's pretty clear he's got a nasty confirmation bias/problem admitting he's made mistakes, and I'd rather help him if at all possible.

>> No.3463066

>>3463048
Dammit, I guess where both Brave, Chivalrous, and Courageous...
I still wish I had been Hufflepuff...

>> No.3463068

>>3463057

Saying you are not a fascist does not make it so. You are taking their word for it, without question, which is silly.

>> No.3463070

>>3463065
stop lying.

>> No.3463073

>>3463068
I don't believe you're a neo-conservative. Saying you're one does not make it so. You will, however, agree that you are one.

>> No.3463076

>>3463070
I'm not. I genuinely do not give a fuck about winning on the internet, though this might surprise you.

>> No.3463077

>>3463073

Good, I'm not.

>> No.3463078

>>3463077
lolque
What are you?

>> No.3463080

>>3463078

A person that supports Liberty of course.

>> No.3463081
File: 6 KB, 256x106, HP-Ravenclaw.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3463081

I'm >>3462880.

Took the sorting quiz. Pic related.

>> No.3463083

>>3463080
No you're not.

>> No.3463084
File: 3 KB, 128x128, images.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3463084

>>3463081
Good job!

>> No.3463085

>>3463083

I disagree.

>> No.3463088

>>3463085
No, you don't.

>> No.3463089

>>3463076
since it hasn't worked, will you stop saying things like "i feel sorry for you"?

because i knew it wouldn't work. and i'm sure if i knew, you knew.

>> No.3463090

>>3463088

Are you sure?

>> No.3463093

>>3463090
How would you respond to that question in my situation?

>> No.3463096

>>3461625
Liberty is either an American Libertarian or classical liberalism (Free Market) supporter.

>> No.3463098

>>3463089
why are you putting effort into stopping me? I'm not going to until I need to disconnect.

>> No.3463103

>>3463098
because i'm doing what you were doing. i'm acting like i care when actually i'm just being an ass.

>> No.3463107

>>3463103
Harsh
I think you actually care, even if the fact that you care is only manifesting itself as some kind of unfortunate need for superiority.

>> No.3463110

>>3463090
How did you get extreme bottom right?

I got about in the middle of of the purple box, and I'm an anarcho-capitalist.

how did you avoid the odd questions?

>> No.3463115
File: 9 KB, 480x400, pcgraphpng.php.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3463115

For the sake of science I collaborated all the "results" posted. I did this by layering all the graphs and removing the graph and leaving the dot.

The most interesting aspect were at least two of the test results were doctored images. I knew this from the dots not being identical to the others. Of these images the results were doctored to the left side of the graph.

Is 4chan too lazy to take the test or afraid not to be left?

>> No.3463121

>>3463093

I would have never put myself into that situation.

>> No.3463122

>>3463107
>even if the fact that you care is only manifesting itself as some kind of unfortunate need for superiority

you're probably right.

were you trying to help by pointing this out? it's a bit blunt. in doing so, you come off as an uncaring ass.

>> No.3463123

I think the test is biased against authoritarian positions.

I've tried my hardest to answer like stalin, and it still says I'm ghandi.

>> No.3463124

Economic Left/Right: 1.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.77

>> No.3463128

>>3463110

I am not sure which hard to answer questions helped me towards that position.

>> No.3463129

>>3463121
Well, shit.
Are you sure I'm not a socialist?
>>3463122
You're on a science board, and you're on 4chan. Don't expect kindness for the sake of it.

>> No.3463139
File: 68 KB, 807x607, american politics in a nutshell.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3463139

libertarian socialism is the best, my friends

>> No.3463145
File: 86 KB, 552x461, marx.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3463145

>>3463139
Maybe we could be friends.

>> No.3463148

>>3463129
Why are you trying to prove to Liberty that you are not a fascist?
That is only an accusation that is thrown around both by the left and the right against one another.

Any political system can be called fascist, even democracy.

Was it not fascist of us to Impose democracy on the Iraqi and Afghani people?

! you should be confident with your Socialist position and not worry about being called a fascist for it, criticize Liberties views, not his taunts.

>> No.3463153

>>3463148
Liberty's*

>> No.3463155
File: 3 KB, 480x400, pcgraphpng.php.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3463155

I really do have a chip on my shoulder from growing up poor

>> No.3463157

>>3463148
>Why are you trying to prove to Liberty that you are not a fascist?
I'm not. I'm trying to make him admit he's wrong, because he seems to be unable to do so. As soon as he does I'll probably go to sleep.

>> No.3463163

>>3463157
You are literally telling him what you want from him.
So if he is just trolling you, you will be here all night.

>> No.3463168

>>3463163
Yep.
I'm an insomniac, and I have all of tommorow to sleep.

>> No.3463173
File: 3 KB, 480x400, pcgraphpng.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3463173

independent thinker

>> No.3463175

>>3463155
hating people for being born into money is like hating someone for being born tall.

trying to cut someone's legs off to level the playing field is dumb.

>> No.3463181

>>3463175
Agreed.

Hating people who give their children unfair advantages, on the other hand

>> No.3463184

>>3463175
>equating a rich person being stripped of money to any other person being stripped of the use of their legs
THIS IS WHAT CONSERVATIVES ACTUALLY BELIEVE.

>> No.3463187

>>3463184
both are something you're born into. one is just a lot less dangerous to give up.

>> No.3463215

>>3463115

One of mine was like three years old, and had an old dot. It wasnt doctored, but I also see you didnt include it.

>> No.3463238

>>3463215
Ah that might explain it. I got a couple that looked like they were made in MS paint lol. But yeah I didn't include any of them that looked off. Not that anything of these dumb tests on 4chan is accurate on anything.

>> No.3463256

>>3463238

Yeah, these tests are kind of flimsy. It would be really interesting to see how the various boards of 4chan compare.

>> No.3463263

>>3463256
nah. almost all users are in the green.

>> No.3463289
File: 3 KB, 480x400, pcgraphpng[1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3463289

Very high IQ and 99th percentile test scores on basically any standardized test I've ever taken.

>> No.3463299
File: 3 KB, 480x400, PoliticalCompassGraph.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3463299

Left-leaning centrist? I'm seeing a trend here.

>> No.3463356

>>3463289
i think we've finally gathered enough evidence proving that anarcho-socialism is the way to go folks.

>> No.3463367
File: 3 KB, 480x400, graph.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3463367

Eh, I'm not surprised, though I really donut care.

>> No.3463375
File: 3 KB, 480x400, pcgraphpng.php.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3463375

Yep.

>> No.3463382

>>3463375
welcome to the club. we're the few and the proud.

>> No.3463391
File: 8 KB, 541x427, dot.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3463391

>> No.3463398
File: 60 KB, 600x398, 0131-ATEAPARTY-TEA-PARTY-TAXES_full_600.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3463398

>>3463382
The Tea Party.

>> No.3463402

>>3463398
good god no.

>> No.3463435

>>3463367
And with the sorting quiz, Ravenclaw.

Ravenclaw - 14
Hufflepuff - 13
Gryffindor - 11
Slytherin - 8

>> No.3463475
File: 38 KB, 600x447, 5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3463475

>>3463398
>>3463382
you niggas are alright.

>> No.3463711
File: 3 KB, 480x400, guys...png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3463711

...master race?