[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 41 KB, 743x399, TIME-CLOAK.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3417276 No.3417276 [Reply] [Original]

GAAA.... WAAAA... ???

I just jizzed all over myself. This stuff is more erotic than high-def. porn to me.

You fellas know what I mean?

http://www.kurzweilai.net/first-demonstration-of-time-cloaking

>> No.3417289

But the cloaked event is still releasing black body radiation. Keeping outside light off of it doesn't make it invisible.

>> No.3417299

>>3417276
thats fucking gay

>> No.3417300

What the fuck? This seems very surreal...

>> No.3417306

I claim bullshit.

>> No.3417309

Now what practical applications would something like this have???

>> No.3417315

By the way, how many seconds is 11000 nanoseconds?

>> No.3417322

>>3417315
11 microseconds

>> No.3417325

>>3417322
How many seconds is 11 microseconds?

>> No.3417343

>>3417325
11*10^-6 seconds.
why are you on /sci/?

>> No.3417359

>>3417343
So wait... 11*-(3/5)? Wtf?
I go on /sci/ because some times there are interesting threads.

>> No.3417380

>>3417359
ok.. assuming you're not trolling.
it's 11 millionths of a second.

>> No.3417385

>>3417380
So 1 second = 0.000001 microsecond, right?

>> No.3417392

I certainly don't know what you mean. I don't even know what they mean. What is time cloaking ?

>> No.3417400

>>3417385
other way around.

>> No.3417414

>>3417400
Oh, sorry, messed up, 0.000001 second = 1 microsecond then, right? Thanks. I still don't get how 11*10^-6 gives that though.

>> No.3417416
File: 511 KB, 855x1200, Oniichan Control v02 c12 - 03.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3417416

if it hides an event, does that mean we can now create a box to put Schrodinger cat in? or does it only hide the light on the event?

>> No.3417417
File: 12 KB, 300x300, 1308528980654.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3417417

>>3417385
no
>>3417400
no

>> No.3417421

>>3417385

exceptional trolling, dear sir
7/10

>> No.3417423

>>3417417
Shut the fuck up, at least he's helping, unlike you.

>> No.3417429

>>3417414
9/10

>> No.3417432
File: 10 KB, 259x194, judge.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3417432

>>3417423

>> No.3417437

I'm assuming that the light that goes straight through at the narrowest point will just go straight through and reveal the object in the middle, despite it being a very narrow gap with which to view said object.

>> No.3417438

>>3417421
I just changed the names, chill.

>>3417429
What are you rating me for?...

>>3417432
If you don't like reading what I say, skip my posts.

>> No.3417439

>>3417414
guys, is Teacup !obkpuSWh5M a known troll? am i being trolled?
anyway, it's 1 microsecond = 10^-6 seconds = 0.000001 seconds

>> No.3417443
File: 94 KB, 500x498, Batman reaction pic.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3417443

>kurzweil
On a related note, I get that it's summer, but FUCK. Not knowing microseconds? Jesus christ, how do you even know to read at that age?

>> No.3417453

>>3417439
No, they just call me a troll because they usually disagree with what I say ("HURR DURR METEORS ARE 95725629672908 KELVIN IN SPACE", according to them).
Thanks for the conversion, I just don't understand the (I suppose times 1) 1*10^-6 part.

>> No.3417460

>>3417443
I know Seconds and miliseconds, I just don't know the rest. Sorry to disappoint?

>> No.3417462

>>3417453

No we call you a troll as a defense mechanism.

It would be too psychologically devastating to admit that someone could actually be as ridiculously retarded as you.

>> No.3417472

>>3417453
well, i don't like using this meme, but...
lrn2scientificnotation

>> No.3417481

>>3417462
>I'm so superior because I can insult others
>This is what people actually do every time when they call me a retard

>>3417472
Can you please just explain it real fast? 10^-6=(-6)/10=-(6/10)=-(3/5) from what I understand.

>> No.3417484

>>3417460
The SI prefixes are extremely self-explanatory and simple. Anyone who hasn't figured them out by the time they are ten is retarded, and we don't like retarded people here.

Nothing personal, kid. I'd stick to GameFAQs if I were you, though.

>> No.3417492

>>3417484
Calm down, I know the main ones, I just don't know the unusual ones. Also:
>Implying I'm a kid
>Implying I ever go on GameFAQs

>> No.3417497

WHAT PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS WILL THIS THING HAVE???

>> No.3417502

>>3417481
wait... do you even know what ^ means?
10^n = 10*10*10*...*10 (you multiply 10 for itself n times).
10^-n = 1/(10^n)

>> No.3417505

>>3417492

If you are seriously not a kid you are incredibly retarded for your age.

>> No.3417519

>>3417502
Wait, what? 10^-n=1/(10^n)? I thought it was -n/10
Haha, oh wow, I'm silly. Thanks for the tip. Doesn't make a whole lot of sense though, but lol.

>>3417505
Keep insulting me, oh intellectually superior one.

>> No.3417536

>>3417492
Look, nobody here who isn't a summerfag is mad. I'm not. I'm just explaining why you don't belong. I don't expect you to leave because I'm telling you this, I know you'll leave when summer is over (or when it's night in US).

First, micro is not an unusual prefix. Yotta is an unusual prefix, Kibi is an unusual prefix. Unusual for reasonably intelligent normal people, that is. For people who are on /sci/ not knowing these is shameful.

Second, if you are too stupid to figure it out the first time you see it, you are just too hopelessly stupid for this place.

Lastly, your first instinct is not to google a term, but to enter a pointless, retarded, prolonged discussion trying to get them to explain it, which is just... You know how when somebody does something REALLY stupid and it's just so bad that YOU feel embarrassed on THEIR behalf? Yeah, you probably don't, nobody can be that much stupider than you are. But then again, you aren't really the audience of this post, so anyhow, it just boggles my mind how the FUCK you wandered in here. I mean, you obviously don't have the mental capacity to appreciate science, why would you click the link, even?

>> No.3417539

>>3417519

scientific notation and international units are literally fifth grade material.

Pointing out your obvious ignorance doesn't make me arrogant like you implied.

I will now assume you are a 10/10 troll, and not reply to you ever.

>> No.3417545

>>3417536
>your first instinct is not to google a term, but to enter a pointless, retarded, prolonged discussion trying to get them to explain it

this is normal facebook behaviour.

>> No.3417550

>>3417536
Nicely put.

>> No.3417558

>>3417536
i partly agree with this.
but i think /sci/ should stop being so elitist. because science shouldn't be.
the guy just asked a honest question, albeit one that reveals a great deal of ignorance in this field.
props to the guy who kept answering him.

>> No.3417560

>>3417539
>10/10 troll
Eh, more like a retard herping his derps, while everyone else looks and says "Gee, what a retard. Who let him out in public?"

>> No.3417564

>>3417558
People keep using it as a slur, but elitism isn't all bad. You go to math professor and ask him to explain fractions, he will and should throw you out.

I'm not saying we think we're professors (some people here do have PhDs though) but you get the point.

>> No.3417567

rofl not knowing scientific notation

you either are in primary school, or really retarded

no wonder why sci sucks

>> No.3417569

ITT: everyone got trolled and the thread is ruined.

Great job, tripfag.

>> No.3417575

>>3417560

See >>3417569

That constitutes a 10/10 troll to me.

>> No.3417580
File: 73 KB, 744x1340, I was only Pretending.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3417580

>>3417569
>thread about ray kurzweil losing his shit over some retarded "cloaking" shit again
>gets killed by retard
And nothing of value was lost.

>> No.3417583

>>3417536
>Look, nobody here who isn't a summerfag is mad. I'm not.
And why would that be? People who come in during the Summer are automatically idiots?

>I don't expect you to leave because I'm telling you this, I know you'll leave when summer is over (or when it's night in US).
Yeah, I've only been here since June 1st GMT -5. Oh, wait, no. I've been here for a few months (admitedly not many). I like /sci/, why the Hell would I leave it when the Summer ends? Also, my posting times are erratic.

>First, micro is not an unusual prefix. Yotta is an unusual prefix, Kibi is an unusual prefix. Unusual for reasonably intelligent normal people, that is. For people who are on /sci/ not knowing these is shameful.
No, micro is an unusual prefix. Kilo to mili are usual prefixes. You also seem to assume that just because I'm on /sci/, I automatically need to know everything that everyone here other than myself knows.

>Second, if you are too stupid to figure it out the first time you see it, you are just too hopelessly stupid for this place.
Again, excuse me for not knowing what the prefix micro means automatically.

>> No.3417585

o rly?

>> No.3417587

>Lastly, your first instinct is not to google a term, but to enter a pointless, retarded, prolonged discussion trying to get them to explain it, which is just...
Which is just totally respectable and the best course of action to take, seeing as an explanation by a human can be changed to fit one's needs and be presented to them in many different ways. Google only does so much.

>You know how when somebody does something REALLY stupid and it's just so bad that YOU feel embarrassed on THEIR behalf? Yeah, you probably don't, nobody can be that much stupider than you are.
You're embarassed by me because I'm such a "retard" that I don't know the meaning of micro?

>But then again, you aren't really the audience of this post, so anyhow, it just boggles my mind how the FUCK you wandered in here. I mean, you obviously don't have the mental capacity to appreciate science, why would you click the link, even?
I find /sci/ence interesting, particularly math. Excuse me, oh wise one, for entering your realm of infinite knowledge and soiling it with my idiotness.
Oh, wait, no, excuse me for entering a board filled with everything but science at most times.

>> No.3417592

Alright so trolls in the thread aside, actually go to arxiv and read the paper. It's kinda neat. That being said I'm not sold that this is gonna be an effective method for any kind of signal cloaking for any extended length of time but its still cool to see theoretical possibilities demonstrated in experiment.

>> No.3417593

>>3417539
>scientific notation(...) [is] literally fifth grade material.
No it is not.
>and international units are literally fifth grade material.
They may be, but again, not the micro.

>>3417564
>You go to math professor and ask him to explain fractions, he will and should throw you out.
Because you asked him a question in his field?

>> No.3417597

>>3417536
I don't know yotta or kibi by heart. Sure I know they exist but I wouldn't know the values if asked. Nobody uses those because we all use the scientific notation.

>> No.3417605

>>3417583
>>3417587
Yo, friend, look. I'm just trying to help you out and explain why this isn't the place for you and why you should go away. This isn't about me being superior to you, for one it's obvious I'm superior to everyone with half a brain, and two there would be no point because I'm anonymous.

It's just that, ignorant and stupid as you are, and I'm stating a fact here not trying to insult you, you will just never catch up with this board. We like to laugh at stupid people here, and this is why everyone is always gonna laugh at you. There's other forums where registration is compulsory and being mean to people is not allowed. You would fit in better there, and have a much better time, I guarantee it.

That's about it.

>> No.3417612

>>3417593
I learnt micro and the value in elementary school. However, it's entirely possible that you haven't so I'll explain
the sci. notation is X times 10 to the power of Y. Y is the amount of zeroes before or after the number. X is the number.
10 would be 1,0*10^1
It's not my business to be elitist and try to insult you but this is assumed knowledge. By the way, you could have looked this up on wikipedia instead of derailing the thread like this.

>> No.3417616

>>3417612
>>3417597
It's not like the issue here is knowing the prefixes anyway. If you didn't have severe mental damage, we would never realize you're so ignorant, because you'd think of looking it up before asking. It amazes me how someone can be on the internet, but not know how to use the internet.

>> No.3417625

>>3417616
I'm not Teacup.

>> No.3417630

>>3417583
>>3417587
>And why would that be? People who come in during the Summer are automatically idiots?
You must be new to all of 4chan.
>Yeah, I've only been here since June 1st GMT -5. Oh, wait, no. I've been here for a few months (admitedly not many). I like /sci/, why the Hell would I leave it when the Summer ends? Also, my posting times are erratic.
Saying GMT -5 to seem technical makes you sound like a retard.
>No, micro is an unusual prefix. Kilo to mili are usual prefixes. You also seem to assume that just because I'm on /sci/, I automatically need to know everything that everyone here other than myself knows.
Kilo TO milli? Are hecto, deca and deci usual for you? Being on /sci/ requires basic knowledge of science and mathematics, something you clearly lack.
>Again, excuse me for not knowing what the prefix micro means automatically.
Hard to forgive something considered common sense to the people around here.
>Which is just totally respectable and the best course of action to take, seeing as an explanation by a human can be changed to fit one's needs and be presented to them in many different ways. Google only does so much.
If only textbook publishers, elementary school teachers, school boards and Salman Khan had made educational resources that teaches this shit.
>You're embarassed by me because I'm such a "retard" that I don't know the meaning of micro?
He's embarrassed that you'd ask people to explain shit to you in the age of Google.
>I find /sci/ence interesting, particularly math. Excuse me, oh wise one, for entering your realm of infinite knowledge and soiling it with my idiotness.
Oh, wait, no, excuse me for entering a board filled with everything but science at most times.
Let me get this straight, you're interested in math, yet you don't understand scientic notation? Also, just because the other threads on this board aren't /sci/ related, doesn't mean you can be a retard.

>> No.3417632

>>3417605
>Yo, friend, look.
Hey, pssst, trying to act superior and typing like that doesn't work.

>I'm just trying to help you out and explain why this isn't the place for you and why you should go away. This isn't about me being superior to you, for one it's obvious I'm superior to everyone with half a brain, and two there would be no point because I'm anonymous.
I don't get why it's not the place for me. It's about science. I like science.

>It's just that, ignorant and stupid as you are, and I'm stating a fact here not trying to insult you
Well, guess what you just did.

>you will just never catch up with this board. We like to laugh at stupid people here, and this is why everyone is always gonna laugh at you. There's other forums where registration is compulsory and being mean to people is not allowed. You would fit in better there, and have a much better time, I guarantee it.
Then keep laughing, keep calling me a retard, and so on.

>>3417612
I just don't get why you would raise 10 to the X in 10^-X. Why does the - magically become a 1/?

>> No.3417650

>>3417632
>Why does the - magically become a 1/?
it's a mathematical convention, it's pointless to ask why.

>> No.3417657

>>3417632
>Hey, pssst, trying to act superior and typing like that doesn't work.
I already explained I wasn't acting superior, and why. lrn2read

>I don't get why it's not the place for me. It's about science. I like science.
Well, how am I supposed to believe that you "like" science when you demonstrably have neither the mental capacity for nor a hint of familiarity with science? I know you are likewise too stupid to understand what you are saying, so I'm not really expecting an answer, but the idea of it still funny.

>> No.3417658

>>3417630
>You must be new to all of 4chan.
Just because someone is a summerfag, it doesn't mean they're idiots. That's generalising.

>Saying GMT -5 to seem technical makes you sound like a retard.
Or, or, get this: I use GMT regularly, because I'm not an American, and I don't know what you call your timezone?

>Kilo TO milli? Are hecto, deca and deci usual for you? Being on /sci/ requires basic knowledge of science and mathematics, something you clearly lack.
Certainly more common than the micro.

>Hard to forgive something considered common sense to the people around here.
Common sense: The new expression for widespread knowledge.

>If only textbook publishers, elementary school teachers, school boards and Salman Khan had made educational resources that teaches this shit.
If they were to have done that, I doubt they'd call it Google.

>He's embarrassed that you'd ask people to explain shit to you in the age of Google.
GUYS, GUYS, WHY DON'T WE ASK GOOGLE HOW TO GO BACK IN TIME? IT KNOWS EVERYTHING.

>Let me get this straight, you're interested in math, yet you don't understand scientic notation? Also, just because the other threads on this board aren't /sci/ related, doesn't mean you can be a retard.
Yes, exactly. And I'm just saying that pissing in an ocean of piss won't affect it.

>> No.3417662

>>3417632
Ah you have trouble with negative exponents. Well I did too so it's no big deal. I'd suggest you make a new thread if after this you don't understand.
1/10 = 10^-1 because any number (that is not zero) to the power of negative one produces it's reciprocal. A reciprocal is basically the converse, opposite. 10.0 -> 0.01, basically. So 0.01 = 10.0^-1. It's defined that way.
Here's a link to a wikipedia article that covers it:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponentiation#Negative_integer_exponents
And another site:
http://www.mathsisfun.com/algebra/negative-exponents.html

>> No.3417663

>>3417632
i want to strangle you.
also,
http://www.khanacademy.org/video/exponent-rules-part-1?playlist=Pre-algebra

>> No.3417665

>>3417650
There's usually some logic behind conventions. It makes sense too, so it can't be arbitrary.

>>3417657
>I already explained I wasn't acting superior, and why. lrn2read
Maybe you weren't trying to act superior, but you are doing it.

>Well, how am I supposed to believe that you "like" science when you demonstrably have neither the mental capacity for nor a hint of familiarity with science? I know you are likewise too stupid to understand what you are saying, so I'm not really expecting an answer, but the idea of it still funny.
Don't believe it then.

>> No.3417674 [DELETED] 

>>3417632

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponentiation#Negative_integer_exponents

>> No.3417677

>>3417632
>I just don't get why you would raise 10 to the X in 10^-X. Why does the - magically become a 1/?
If you have 10^2 its 100. Two zeros. If you have 10^1 its 10. One zero. If you have 10^0 its 1. Zero zeros. 10^-1 = 0,1. Now the zero is on the other side, see? Now a milli- is 10^-3. Thats 0,001. Milli, micro, nano, piko. They are 10^-3, 10^-6, 10^-9 and 10^-12 respectively.
If you are on /sci/ you should know that for granted. Now you do, so lets stop this discussion shall we?

>> No.3417683

>>3417657
>when you demonstrably have neither the mental capacity for nor a hint of familiarity with science?
An empty piece of paper has no demonstrable scientific value or knowledge yet great capacity for it.

>> No.3417689

>>3417683
Well, I'm glad a (literal) empty piece of paper is not here insisting that we explain grade school math to it, then.

>> No.3417690

>>3417677
It's actually because the minus makes the outcome be the opposite of a power with a positive value

>> No.3417692

>>3417689
On a second though, I needn't say "literal".

>> No.3417694

>>3417665
You know the rules of exponents, right?

10^2 / 10^1 = 10^1. So you can describe 10^a / 10^b as 10^(a-b)

Next, take 10^0 / 10^3. We all know that 10^0 is 1, so the result is 1/10^3, or 1/1000, or .001. But if we apply the above rule, we get that it can be expressed as 10^-3, because 10^(0-3) = 10^-3. Therefore, 10^-3 must equal 1/10^3

>> No.3417695

>>3417662
Thanks.

>>3417663
Thanks (despite the attitude).

>>3417674
Thanks.

>>3417677
This one really did it though. Best explanation so far.

>> No.3417696

>>3417689
These metaphors work way better when you're an ancient Eastern man with white hair and a beard..

>> No.3417702

>>3417692
If you didn't you would have to alter 'an' as well

>> No.3417712

damn it feels good to have a comment hide option.

>> No.3417715

>>3417658
>Just because someone is a summerfag, it doesn't mean they're idiots. That's generalising.
Stop, you're new to this place. We get it. Now stop embarrassing yourself.
>Or, or, get this: I use GMT regularly, because I'm not an American, and I don't know what you call your timezone?
Wait what?
>Certainly more common than the micro.
They're not. Micro is used more often in physics than hecto, deca or deci.
>Common sense: The new expression for widespread knowledge.
Common sense is relative and temporal. The Internet for example can now be considered something of common sense. Also, try to read the last three words of my sentence.
>If they were to have done that, I doubt they'd call it Google.
They're indexed by Google.
>GUYS, GUYS, WHY DON'T WE ASK GOOGLE HOW TO GO BACK IN TIME? IT KNOWS EVERYTHING.
Obvious underage. Google can however explain why we cannot travel back in time.
>Yes, exactly. And I'm just saying that pissing in an ocean of piss won't affect it.
Then can you really blame us for getting upset at you pissing in our ocean?

Also, why are you posting with a trip? Is it so we can more easily identify you as a retard?

>> No.3417720

>>3417690
Disregard >>3417695, this one made me confused again. Why does the - make it the opposite?

>>3417694
Isn't x^0=1 just a convention though?

>> No.3417741

>Stop, you're new to this place. We get it. Now stop embarrassing yourself.
Thing is, I'm not. But sure.

>Wait what?
Americans call their timezones PST, or EST, or other things. I use GMT for my timezone, and happen to know that America is partially on the -5, so I said GMT -5.

>They're not. Micro is used more often in physics than hecto, deca or deci.
Okay.

>Common sense is relative and temporal. The Internet for example can now be considered something of common sense. Also, try to read the last three words of my sentence.
What are you onto here?

>They're indexed by Google.
Along with lots and lots of irrelevant shit.

>Obvious underage. Google can however explain why we cannot travel back in time.
I'm lost here.

>Then can you really blame us for getting upset at you pissing in our ocean?
If it doesn't affect you, then yes, I can.

>Also, why are you posting with a trip? Is it so we can more easily identify you as a retard?
I always use my trip.

>> No.3417750

>>3417720
because X^-1 is defined as being the opposite of X

>> No.3417755

>>3417750
But why express it with -?

>> No.3417757

>>3417720
No, x^0 is not a convention. It can be deduced similarly.

If x^a/x^b = x^(a-b), then x^a/x^a is equal to x^(a-a), or x^0.

But, x^a / x^a is also equal to 1, because anything divided by itself is 1. Therefore, x^0 is equal to 1.

>> No.3417758

>>3417741
Sure, google is not perfect. But if you were to look for "scientific notation" or "negative exponents" or hell, even 'negative power' (no quotes) you would find the answers you were looking for.

>> No.3417760

>>3417720
x^0=x^(a-a)=x^a/x^a=1

>> No.3417767

>>3417755
The proof is >>3417694, stop asking questions

>> No.3417770

>>3417755
Get out.
>>3417663
was kind enough to find you a video.

>> No.3417771

>>3417755
because it gives you a nice number line if you were to make an exponential graph, for example. You go from x^1, 2, 3, 4 so it makes sense to go backwards like 1, 0, -1, -2 right?

>> No.3417773

>>3417771
That's not why

>> No.3417777

>>3417773
Ok you explain it in a way so he gets it then.

>> No.3417779

>>3417777

See:
>>3417694

>> No.3417783

>>3417720
X^-1 can be written in a different manner, 1/X^1, so X^-1=1/X. Let X be 10. 10^-3 can be written as 1/10^3, and that can then be written as 1/1000, meaning one thousandth.

>> No.3417785

It's hilarious how you faggots think math has a million axioms set by stupid mathematicians for minor convenience, when it barely has a handful.

I blame poor math teachers. But then again, if you knew math you wouldn't waste your life teaching.

>> No.3417788

>>3417779
protip: he didn't get it after that. So we went downwards and downwards until we just said 'it gives you a nice straight line' and called it a day.

>> No.3417798

>>3417757
Why even put the b in there if you're just going to replace it with an a?

>>3417758
/sci/ > Google

>>3417770
I know he was kind enough to do that, but I was confused again.

>>3417771
Wait why, it's because of graphs? Why not make a little hole in there if we don't know what it equals, like with limits?

>> No.3417800

>>3417798
>Why even put the b in there if you're just going to replace it with an a?
Troll confirmed, nothing to see here

>> No.3417801

>>3417788
>>3417798
I concede. Good luck guys. Might have to resurrect Feynman.

>> No.3417807

>>3417788
So you're dumbing it down and not really explaining it?... Well, gee, thanks.

>>3417800
If a=b, why not just use just a's?

>> No.3417809

>>3417798
I recommend you leave /sci/ and try physics forums. The guys there are nicer and more accepting of your kind.

>> No.3417814

>>3417809
Oh lord. Poor physics forums. You just threw them a real piece of work!

>> No.3417821

>>3417809
>>3417814
I'm not going to physics forums, I don't like them.

>> No.3417823

>>3417814
Nah, I'd figure being told off by real mathematicians will prove to be much more disheartening.

>> No.3417825

>>3417807
Because I was trying to be nice and restate the rule of exponents that when you have the a fraction, where both numbers have the same base and different exponents, you subtract the exponent. I expressed it as x^a / x^b = x^(a-b), but I could have said y^z / y^ñ = y^(z - ñ), for all it's worth.

The point is, x^a / x^a = x^(a-a) = x^0 = 1, but "x" and "a" can be anything, from "7" and "42" to "q" and "b"

>> No.3417831
File: 30 KB, 305x193, gringo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3417831

>>3417821
>I'm not going to physics forums, I don't like them.
You funny, troll.

>> No.3417832

>>3417823
>>3417821
It must've already happened.

>> No.3417851

>>3417825
I still don't get why you didn't just use a's.

>>3417831
Oh God, that image, I'm choking and gasping for air, are you trying to kill me? Also, I just realised what I actually said.

>>3417832
Actually, no, I just hate the layouts. 4chan makes me feel cozy, unlike those grey layouts. Also, people there are all self-entitled jerks.

>> No.3417852

Successful troll is remarkably successful.

>> No.3417860

>>3417851
because he was explaining how dividing exponents works first

>> No.3417870

>>3417860
But the b's just confused me more, because they could be different values then.

>> No.3417883

>>3417870
well yeah, he used the b because it would show how different values would have interacted before he shows how same values would have worked out.

>> No.3417895

>>3417883
But he should've only used the a's.

>> No.3417901

>>3417895
in the first example, no. In the second, yes. And in the second one he did.

>> No.3417909

>>3417901
But he was talking bout a = b, he should've used a both times.

>> No.3417962

a troll hijacked this tread

>> No.3417984

STOP RESPONDING TO THAT A-HOLE. I wanna hear you sciency people talk about the actual cloaking thing, cause I dont know what the hell is going on, but I still want to try and know because "time cloak" sounds cool

>> No.3417993

>>3417909

How far through pre-college maths are you?

>> No.3417996

HEY GUYS I CAMCORDED MY CAT AND TURNED IT OFF AND BACK ON AGAIN THEN PLAYED IT

TIME HOLE

HOLY SHIT