[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 14 KB, 348x232, dealwithit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3270866 No.3270866 [Reply] [Original]

Ask someone with a 154 IQ anything.

>Perhaps I can lend insight into some matters which confound you plebs.

>> No.3270867

Why do you think IQ equals intelligence?

>> No.3270870

how do i good in solving puzzles?

>> No.3270872

so what online IQ test did you take?

>> No.3270878

>>3270866
Why are you such a faggot?

>> No.3270880

>>3270867
>oh boy here we go

IQ is the best known measure of intelligence. It's obviously not PERFECT, but it is quite efficient. A genius isn't going to score low on a test asking relatively basic questions. Likewise, a retard isn't going to accidentally get a high score.

>> No.3270886

>>3270878
>>3270872
>>3270867

>inafter butthurt dumbfags

>> No.3270890

>>Ask someone with a 154 IQ anything.
I will if I ever find one

>> No.3270891

­­

>> No.3270892
File: 13 KB, 209x168, trollface.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3270892

>>3270880
but who makes the IQ tests? how can they be an objective test of intelligence?

>> No.3270895

­­What contributions have you made to improve mankind?

>> No.3270896 [DELETED] 

My IQ is 155. You can't tell me anything I didn't already know about.

>> No.3270898
File: 18 KB, 398x343, 1278170117548.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3270898

>>3270890

>> No.3270900

>>3270866

Which school do you go to and what is your major?

>> No.3270903

>>3270895
None, to be honest. I do have a knack for solving problems. I think I would be able to solve a lot of problems in science or mathematics if I had the motivation. But I'm perfectly content exploiting my intelligence for monetary gain rather than human betterment.

>> No.3270905

>>3270866
How many papers have you written and how groundbreaking were they?

>> No.3270907

­­>>3270903
So what you're saying is you're worthless.

>> No.3270908

>>3270900
USC. Bio (premed).

>> No.3270912

>>3270905
None. But I certainly plan to do some research in my field.

>>3270907
Yes.

But the purpose of this thread is for me to solve some problems which only require thought with minimal prerequisite knowledge.

>> No.3270914

>>3270907
You'll find that most people are.

>> No.3270919

>>3270870
Have me as your father.

>> No.3270920

If you were passing through a black hole (assuming you didn't get stretched into a noodle and die) and you looked inwards toward the singularity, what would you see? What about looking backwards? Why?

>> No.3270923

>>3270866

How would you axiomatise decidability?

>> No.3270927

>>3270923
subjectively

>> No.3270928

>>3270920
>If you were passing through a black hole (assuming you didn't get stretched into a noodle and die) and you looked inwards toward the singularity, what would you see?

Darkness. Absence of light. The gravity would have sucked in any light that you would have otherwise seen.

>What about looking backwards?

Depends on the location of the black hole.

>> No.3270929

How do I calculate Tangents without using the tan() button?
=) have tried...

>> No.3270932
File: 3 KB, 591x55, beb7c0dcf6927945a2dcd7d277146c34.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3270932

>>3270929

>> No.3270933

What Harry Potter house are you?

>> No.3270935

>>3270929
Visualize the unit circle. To compute the common tan functions, simply apply the 30-60-90 and 45-45-90 rules. For others you can manipulate trig identities.

>> No.3270938

>>3270927

That's retarded. "A set is recursive because I say so". Shows how much IQ is worth, eh?

>> No.3270939

WHY DO KIDS LOVE THE TASTE OF CINNAMON TOAST CRUNCH?

>> No.3270941

>>3270929
You silly, just use the sin and cos buttons. It gives the same result.

>> No.3270942

>>3270938
That wasn't me. I'm using a trip now--only for this thread ofc.

>> No.3270949

>>3270923
Yeah, I don't know much about set theory etc. I want to, but I'm addicted to 4chan and have little time to study anything beyond than my coursework.

>> No.3270951

>>3270880
Based on that logic, having 154 IQ simply means you're not a retard. I'm sure most people here aren't.

So I'll keep the question open -- what makes you think that IQ is a measure of *anything* other than not being a complete retard?

>> No.3270952

>>3270949

How do you reconcile being a genius with wasting your days on 4chan?

>> No.3270956
File: 15 KB, 614x604, 1272643067511.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3270956

>>3270949
>super high IQ
>addicted to 4chan

>> No.3270958

>>3270952
>>3270956

Ohyou.jpg

Don't act like you're not.

>> No.3270967
File: 32 KB, 407x405, I-CAN-COUNT-TO-POTATO.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3270967

Woats the meanion of laife op ?

>> No.3270968

>>3270958

Well I have time for study outside of my courses. And that's what I use it for. I only pop up once a day to troll retards like you.

>> No.3270969

>>3270958
>Don't act like you're not.

That's not what I asked you. Answer the question.

>How do you reconcile being a genius with wasting your days on 4chan?

>> No.3270972

>>3270958
Not so addicted I can't learn another language and write a paper following the end of my degree in my spare time. Problem?

>> No.3270995

>>3270972

Hi five. While OP is being an aspie, I'm learning Spanish and preparing two papers for publication.

>> No.3270999

>>3270967
There is no meaning. Trying to apply meaning to something as raw as life is anthropomorphism. "Meaning" is a human concept. It does not apply to the nature of life no more than "meaning" applies to the way the sun rises and falls.

It simply does. Cause and effect. Tide goes in, tide goes out, never a miscommunication. These are results of physical processes.

Life is the result of a largely physical process. All organisms have arisen from a single cell; mitosis and meiosis brings the diversity of life and the complexity of your human body.

To test if there is any legitimate "meaning" to life, we should look at "lower" animals. Take the life of a frog, for instance. To sum up the essence of his entire life as we are looking retrospectively, everything he has done in his life revolves around his metabolic needs dictated by his inherited genome. We see this pattern in all life forms, including humans. Your entire life is and will be simply the actualization of your genome. What you accomplish to benefit other humans, and perhaps other life forms, will not have any ultimate bearing on the essence of your life, because you still were a biological organism who lived and died.

Live
[Fill in blank, this step does not matter]
Reproduce
Die
Rinse, repeat

There is no meaning here. Billions and billions of ants have gone through this process. It's unlikely anything awaited them after they decomposed.

>> No.3271003

>>3270995
I learned most of Spanish after I watched a few hours of Telemundo with English subtitles. I am able to communicate with Mexicans to a reasonable degree without having taken a course or gone through the formal channels.

>> No.3271007

I used the word plebeian some time ago. Now everybody uses it. Fuck..

Ok op, i'm stick in this obsessive internet consumption. I'm transorming into this internet zombie and ultimate computer addict. What should I do. Use your brain to solve this motherfucker.

>> No.3271011

>>3271003

I can communicate with Chinese people to a reasonable degree and I haven't learnt a smitten of Mandarin in my life. It's called being a social being. Humans can communicate because we have 5 million years of selection for it.

When you can argue Cervantes with a professor in Madrid then you can claim to know Spanish.

>> No.3271013

>>3270969
>How do you reconcile being a genius with wasting your days on 4chan?

How does Chris Langan reconcile being a genius despite being a blue-collar bar bouncer?

How did the countless other genius humans in history and pre-history (evidence shows that we are not any smarter than pre-historic man) reconcile their genius with their primitive tribal life?

A lazy or drug-addicted genius is still a genius.

>> No.3271020

>>3271007
this OP, save us from ourselves! I should be studying russian right now, but hitting f5 and browsing 4chan is ruining me... but also entertaining me..

>> No.3271025

>>3271007
>>3271007
>Ok op, i'm stick in this obsessive internet consumption. I'm transorming into this internet zombie and ultimate computer addict. What should I do. Use your brain to solve this motherfucker.

I have the same problem myself. I have been an internet addict for many years. I have somehow managed to keep my grades up, but everything else in my life is utter shit. No social life. I have lost connection with every friend I have ever made. I am largely incapable of making new friends. And yes, I am a virgin. If I could hit a button to prevent me from using the internet again, my life would radically change. But I get too much of a dopamine rush to ever quit in the near future. I'm holding out for getting bored of this, which I hope will inevitably come.

>> No.3271030

>>3271013

Because Langan is not a genius. He is birdseed thrown by the media to the masses because he's easier to relate to than real men of science.

>> No.3271033

>>3271013

I couldn't help but notice you still haven't answered the question.

Attempting to divert attention from it is not going to make it go away. I did not ask Chris Langan, nor the nebulous collection of people you're casually referring to.

Answer the question.

>> No.3271035

Can you taste the difference between butter and I can't believe it's not butter?

>> No.3271046

Wouldn't 'No meaning' in itself be a meaning, meaning no meaning? =D

>> No.3271048

>>3271035
It's more of a feeling. Butter you could stop yourself from swallowing, whereas ICBINB will slide down your throat in one piece even when it's melted.

>> No.3271052

>>3271033
I consider myself a genius on the basis of my IQ score. IQ is our best measure of intelligence. If you have a better method of testing intelligence, we're all ears. But IQ is the standard of educators and psychologists who study this. I can only assume that they would have switched to some other more effective intelligence test should 2.0 have come out.

So being a lazy fuck is irrelevant. Laziness or other personality disorders are mutually exclusive w.r.t. intelligence.

>> No.3271053

>>3271048
I said taste, dammit. Stop sidestepping the question.
I don't care about your new age feeling bullshit.

>> No.3271055

Which test scored you at 154?

>> No.3271058

>>3271035
I cannot. But I can tell the difference between margarine and real butter.

>> No.3271059

>>3271052

So. You're a genius because the psychologist tells you so, and you assume they are right?

Why not USE your genius to develop an intelligence test that actually works?

>> No.3271064

>>3271055
Stanford-Binet

>> No.3271074

Do you really expect us to believe you without any proof?
The answers you're giving to the questions in this thread lead me to believe you're not very intelligent.

>> No.3271078

>>3271064
ANSWER MY QUESTION!!!!!! WHAT FUCKING HARRY POTTER HOUSE ARE YOU IN!?!?!

>> No.3271081

>>3271059
If I were designing an intelligence test, I would test primarily how many concepts one can hold in their mind at one moment. I believe all other aspects of intelligence derive from this sort of brain multitasking. Most animals cannot process more than one cognitive command at any given moment.

>> No.3271084

>>3271078
Gryffindor master race

>> No.3271085

>>3271052
>IQ is out best measure of intelligence

>Hawking was asked about his IQ in a 2004 newspaper interview, and replied, "I have no idea. People who boast about their I.Q. are losers." Yet when asked "Are you saying you are not a genius?", Hawking replied "I hope I'm near the upper end of the range."

IQ is a test of pre-adulthood mental development relative to the expected norm at a given age. It was never meant to be used on adults and produces no useful results when applied this way.

There is no accurate test of adult intelligence.

>> No.3271090

>>3271081
Frequent multitasking is a common symptom of many cognitive problems.
You're supposed to put all your concentration onto one subject, not multiple.

>> No.3271097
File: 34 KB, 500x367, button863.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3271097

>>3271084

>> No.3271101
File: 34 KB, 500x367, paper270.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3271101

>>3271097

>> No.3271102

>>3271052

>But IQ is the standard of educators

Really, OP? Not one of my educators made me take an IQ test. Their metric of intelligence generally related to capacity of independent thought, rather than parroting what a psychologist told you.

>> No.3271106

>>3271084
>Gryffindor master race
laughingwhores.jpg

>> No.3271108

>>3271052
I think you meant to say aren't mutually exclusive, do you at least recognise that there are many different facets of intelligence and that IQ tests tend not to test for all of them? Not only that but intelligence itself has a fairly shaky definition, is someone with a good short term memory intelligent? How about someone who is good at verbal logic? How about someone who has good spatial reasoning? Now which of these people is the most intelligent? Their minds are suited to different tasks but that doesn't make one objectively better than the other.

>> No.3271111
File: 31 KB, 500x328, care596.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3271111

>>3270932

>> No.3271114

>>3271108
>the ability to learn or understand or to deal with new or trying situations : reason; also : the skilled use of reason

>Not only that but intelligence itself has a fairly shaky definition,
Uh-oh, he's trying to use philosophy to continue deluding himself that he's intelligent. (Nice, IP address, by the way)

>> No.3271116
File: 26 KB, 425x355, crime120.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3271116

>>3271108

>> No.3271119
File: 4 KB, 126x85, down971.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3271119

>>3271114

>> No.3271125
File: 23 KB, 379x286, surprise469.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3271125

>>3271116

>> No.3271127
File: 34 KB, 500x375, comparison962.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3271127

>>3271111

>> No.3271131

>>3271108
You're right. That was an error.

As far as the different types of intelligence, I agree that those do exist. But I think general intelligence does exist. A person with high general intelligence would score higher on everything, while maintaining the proportions in accordance with their talents. So visually if you were comparing the test scores of two people who were respectively more talented at verbal reasoning (one with lower general intelligence, other higher), the graph for the high-general person would be stretched vertically.

>> No.3271132

>>3271114
You could define the ability to reason or the ability to learn as intelligence but what I'm saying is that there are other aspects of thought which this definition ignores. That's what I mean when I say that intelligence doesn't have a single proper definition.

>> No.3271138
File: 20 KB, 360x264, neck512.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3271138

>> No.3271141

>>3271131
forgot my (temp) trip

>> No.3271142
File: 13 KB, 371x300, short993.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3271142

>>3271131

>> No.3271143

>>3271132
>That's what I mean when I say that intelligence doesn't have a single proper definition.
>Having a high IQ means you're a genius
So, tell me again how you can believe both of these at once? Isn't there measures of intelligence that an IQ test can't measure?

>> No.3271146
File: 21 KB, 360x264, wall861.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3271146

>>3271141

>> No.3271151
File: 6 KB, 163x120, hear843.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3271151

>> No.3271154

>>3271131
I see what you're getting at, and certainly you could find people who are simply better at all facets of thought than others. But it doesn't necessarily define a 'total order' i.e. there are some people who you can't really say are more intelligent than others for precisely this reason, maybe someone is moderately intelligent in everything and someone else is highly intelligent in one thing but functionally retarded in others, how do you place values on the various aspects of intelligence in order to compare them? There isn't really a simple way of doing it without being at least somewhat arbitrary. Also I think
http://cbstrials.com/Open/Default.aspx?B_ID=279
is probably a better measure of intelligence than an IQ test

>> No.3271167

>>3271143
Maybe because we're not the same poster

>> No.3271227

I have 123 IQ, but I'm not going to take it as fact.

>> No.3271233

>>3271227
136 reporting in peons. test administered by State diagnostician.

>> No.3271234

>>3271233
Only 128 here, but I have made love to a human female, so I guess that makes me King Aspie of this thread.

OP, fuck off. I'm sure there's some sort of edit war on an anime Wikipedia page you should be attending to.

>> No.3271236

>>3271234
>jelly

>> No.3271242

>>3271236
136 here, OP are you legit, or trolling?

Do you believe my claim?

>> No.3271277

Why do you think youre having that high inteligence just because of your IQ?

>> No.3271299

>>3271277
Why can't you read the first reply or type coherently?

>> No.3271305

You don't have an IQ of 154. You scored 154 in an IQ test.
I mean I've scored anything between 120 and 140 since the 80s. That's a 15% fluctuation.

Have you explored this possibility? How many times have you repeated the test?

>> No.3271310

the request in your green test appeals to knowledge whereas IQ appeals to an abstract, undefined skill.

And that there is why you are most certainly not a genius.

>> No.3271329
File: 36 KB, 185x266, 1401.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3271329

"People who boast about their IQ are losers"
— Stephen Hawking

>> No.3271336

Nice generic answers to every question OP. You have no real knowledge of anything, do you?

>> No.3271411

>>3271064
That's interesting. From what I understand the max score on that test is 148. There is a secondary test which then further examines your IQ should you score 148, which is a more advanced test.

I know because as a child I took the stanford bi net for children, scored 148, and was given this secondary test.

>> No.3271528

>>3271411
By the way OP, since your IQ is likely significantly lower than what you claimed, what I'm elaborating on here is how you are a liar.

>> No.3271760

Everybody so Jelly! Stop hating and ask him intresting questions instead! Also iq isnt a value that a test approximate, iq is defined as the result of the test, thus reasoning such as i scored 124 but i am not sure that is for real is wrong.

>> No.3271769

do u believa that u perciev the world in a different fashion then other people?

>> No.3271798

­

>> No.3271999

I got 156 on local mensa preparation test when I was 12. Could have I been a genius? Perhaps. Am I a genius ? Fuck no.

>> No.3272026

Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

>> No.3272050

>>3271085
> "I hope I'm near the upper end of the range."
Can't you see you're blinded by humility ? Even Hawking is.
Of course he's in the upper range.
But he's not logical because he wants to appear wise.
You need logic to solve IQ tests, with a better logic you solve more questions, so the IQ result is correlated to the amount of logic you can display. Would you argue that logic is not correlated with intelligence ?
So even if it's not totally accurate and some questions are bullshit, it's still relevant.
How can you deny this ?

>> No.3272079

u need random pattern recognition skills, not logic. Those are diferent, yet related skills.

>> No.3272082

>>3270866
Given that all meritocratic processes of ability-based selection, in both the fields of education and work, are already in extreme decline, are you concerned that your own abilities will be rendered useless, outside of freelance business endeavours and other such work-arounds? I, personally, am concerned about such issues, and have taken appropriate steps so as to minimise the potential gateways that lie in front of me. In addition, have you done the same, or do you have such workings in progress?

>> No.3272104

>>3270866
Explain mass please.

>> No.3272119

>>3270866
Do you regret being born stupid? Do you feel that you wish you'd had an iq in the mid-low range for /sci/? What do you do when you're too smart for the stupids and too dumb for the smarts? Genuinely interested... Did you go to a college or what?

>> No.3272157

OP just did an innacurate IQ test online

>> No.3272285

>>3271310
Yes, but I'm quite sure I can look at things differently (read: at a higher level) than you. And the greentext implied that we were dealing with philosophical matters, which do not require much knowledge in any case.

>> No.3272293

>>3272082
>Given that all meritocratic processes of ability-based selection, in both the fields of education and work, are already in extreme decline

What about going to university, acing a few difficult degrees, and then working? Since when was this route (the traditional route) in decline?

>> No.3273021

lol aspie general