Why is it that men cross-culturally, no matter which continent they originate, prefer fairer skinned women relative to their culture?

File: 443 KB, 1564x2421, 1301976177213.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Mon May 23 23:38:25 2011 No.3110952 [Reply] [Original]

Why is it that men cross-culturally, no matter which continent they originate, prefer fairer skinned women relative to their culture?

>>	Anonymous Mon May 23 23:39:25 2011 No.3110959 >>3110952 this post is so retarded idk where to start

>>	Anonymous Mon May 23 23:40:25 2011 No.3110967 there are white guys who prefer niggers

>>	Anonymous Mon May 23 23:41:25 2011 No.3110975 Hard to get a tan outside of the kitchen.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 23 23:42:25 2011 No.3110978 >>3110967 Statistics only work on a macroscopic scale?! Holdthepresses.jpg

>>	FUCK BITCHES GET MONEY !iILHznJ.V6 Mon May 23 23:42:25 2011 No.3110983 >>3110959 In the words of Pauli, It's not even wrong.

>>	Anonymous Mon May 23 23:44:25 2011 No.3110993 ITT: butthurt anti-racist responses

>>	Anonymous Mon May 23 23:45:25 2011 No.3110997 >>3110952 Biological sign or youth, not the opposite (I.E: Black, dead)?

>>	Anonymous Mon May 23 23:47:25 2011 No.3111008 >>3110983 >>3110978 >>3110967 >>3110959 Cry moar

>>	Anonymous Mon May 23 23:50:25 2011 No.3111025 >>3110952 idunnolol.jpg Good question. http://www.bgsu.edu/departments/chem/faculty/leontis/chem447/PDF_files/Jablonski_skin_color_2000.pdf

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 00:21:25 2011 No.3111145 Fairer? Like, clearer? Then yes. Can't stand acne, cullulite, etc. Darker the better, and me be a white boi.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 00:32:25 2011 No.3111193 Sure... That's why hundreds of millions of people willingly expose themselves to the cancer-causing rays of the sun just to artificially darken their skin tone.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 00:36:25 2011 No.3111209 Is that true universally and historically? Sometimes people prefer darker. I have (white) buddies who only go for white girls, but they love the ones that are tanned.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 00:36:56 2011 No.3111212 >>3110952 what the fuck? so OP finds a pale chick who is really hot and then uses this as the basis of his retarded post.

Anonymous Tue May 24 02:00:25 2011 No.3111638

its obviously largely cultural. I'd say history has alot to do with it, Europe and Asia are "fair skinned", Australia (not the abo's) comes from the british etc, and the US is largely from european decent ie immigrants.

Historically "fair skinned" people have thought themselves superior, ie colonizing africa,slaves,colonizing australia, US colonies ,etc.

So id imagine alot of people are looking for "fair skinned" people without even knowing a real reason, or it could be that everyone just has their own taste(which is what i believe).

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 02:01:25 2011 No.3111645 >>3110952 Obviously, you have never been to America....

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 02:05:25 2011 No.3111666 this white guy loves darker skin. Not black, but like filipino or thai skin is just fantastic

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 02:09:25 2011 No.3111692 According to your argument, everyone should want to fuck gingers, and niggers should be unable to get laid. Does that sound like the world we live in to you?

Anonymous Tue May 24 02:32:25 2011 No.3111830

>>3111209
>>3111193
>>3111212
It's not like he just made this shit up, guys.

http://vdare.com/sailer/050612_blondes.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_attractiveness#Skin_tone

A preference for lighter-skinned women has remained prevalent over time, even in cultures without European contact.[99][100] Anthropologist Peter Frost stated that since higher-ranking men were allowed to marry the perceived more attractive women, who tended to have fair skin, the upper classes of a society generally tended to develop a lighter complexion than the lower classes by sexual selection (see also Fisherian runaway).[99][100]

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 02:38:25 2011 No.3111856 >>3111830 Possible psychological roots: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-535828/Why-men-prefer-fair-skinned-maidens-women-like -dark-handsome-strangers.html

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 02:41:25 2011 No.3111871 >>3110952 every race thinks white women are gods.. period. anyone thinks otherwise should be shot.

Anonymous Tue May 24 02:45:25 2011 No.3111885

Tanned skin looks better, but only be cause it drowns out the flaws. That and in modern culture, women that tan themselves show they can afford to play the game, the same way they spend time on applying makeup. But pale skin is better because it lets you get more information on your mate about potential for skin problems. Maybe its something evolutionarily sensible thats simply been overridden in US culture by sexual selection for tans.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 02:54:25 2011 No.3111915 The preference for a pale mate is cultural, and stems from an era when being tan meant you had to labor outdoors for significant amounts of time, and where thus of a poorer socio-economic class than pale people.

>>	Scientist !!ThFjnJh4EkH Tue May 24 02:56:25 2011 No.3111928 >>3111871 Sorry. I like white women and Asian women. And I don't plan on being shot any time soon.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 02:58:25 2011 No.3111932 >>3110975 Pretty much this. Fairer skinned women haven't been out in the sun much, meaning the have the luxury of not working and staying inside. Means they are rich and more likely to bear a healthy child.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 03:11:25 2011 No.3111984 >Working class women have darker skin and are more fit a.k.a. less feminine >People who are upper class want to reinforce thise by not marrying obviously working class women >Fair Skin is preferred originally for social reasons

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 03:19:16 2011 No.3112018 >>3111928 My friend used to do this sort of stuff at UCSD. He says it's just epeen, not actually useful.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 03:19:25 2011 No.3112023 File: 108 KB, 700x975, You are Awesome!.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>3111928 Dem asian women, man...

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 03:20:16 2011 No.3112030 File: 65 KB, 768x1024, 1302849399197.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>3112023

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 03:22:25 2011 No.3112034 File: 108 KB, 1024x768, bai ling 3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>3112030 >>3112023 Best thread derailment ever.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 03:25:25 2011 No.3112047 >>3111692 Are you fucking retarded? Or can you seriously just not tell the difference between microscopic and macroscopic scales?

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 03:41:25 2011 No.3112108 >>3110952 Because evolution moves forward ->

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 03:53:25 2011 No.3112151 its fashion related, we are culturally biased towards cloths, hair dye and makeup which has been designed for white chicks.

Anonymous Tue May 24 04:00:25 2011 No.3112177
File: 35 KB, 493x524, truthchart.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Actually, all women from across the world think white men are gods, especially Asian women. Why? There are a number of reasons. One being that white men are the tallest race on average and studies showing women like tall men more than handsome men. Genetics, attraction, etc.

White men still prefer white women btw and it's obvious why. White women are white. White people like white people. Everybody else wishes they were white. Deal with it.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 04:02:25 2011 No.3112184 File: 16 KB, 349x285, notevolve.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Because even apes know who the master race is.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 04:07:25 2011 No.3112196 >>3112151 but there's practically every shade and color of cosmetic and clothing under the sun. the main reason that fashion looks better on certain races. for other races, it's like putting lipstick on a pig.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 04:25:25 2011 No.3112261 >>3112151 It's cross-cultural. See >>3111830 >A preference for lighter-skinned women has remained prevalent over time, even in cultures without European contact.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 04:35:25 2011 No.3112289 File: 255 KB, 1038x900, ganguro.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] erm, so why is tanning and fake tanning so poular guys?

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 04:51:25 2011 No.3112337 >>3112289 Is it popular? Because that shit looks shit.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 04:53:25 2011 No.3112343 >>3112289 gyaru are a bad example because they evolved in retaliation to traditional japanese beauty ideals, not because they thought it necessarily looked lovely.

>>	sage Tue May 24 05:06:25 2011 No.3112382 >>3110952 i prefer darker skinned women relative to my culture which pretty much nullifies your point, unless you rephrase it

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 05:15:25 2011 No.3112408 >>3112177 That's fascinating. Especially how the group that black females least often reply to are black males. I don't know how sound the experiment is, though. Do you have a link or something?

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 05:20:25 2011 No.3112420 >>3112337 >thinks pic is in any way serious evidence >asks if tanning is popular >mfw yes it is popular. suggest you check out such esoteric behaviours as "sunbathing", "tanning booths" and "fake tan". maybe go to a beach in summer one day.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 05:21:25 2011 No.3112426 >>3112408 >don't know how sound this experiment you're implying data from a controlled and therefore "scientific" experiment would be more scientific than this data, which isn't experimental btw, it's just fucking data from the real world.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 05:21:25 2011 No.3112428 >>3112343 another aspie that gets distracted by a pic, not the text sunbathing and tanning are very popular activities, they go in and out of style as the decades change, but remain popular.

Anonymous Tue May 24 05:45:25 2011 No.3112529

>>3112426
Don't get uppity, just because he didn't know that.
It could still be used as scientific data, just not for a very thorough thesis.
Anyway, all I'm seeing in that graph is that black women are the most likely to respond, to anybody. Either they're more desperate, more polite, or there's just more of them on dating sites.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 05:49:25 2011 No.3112545 >>3111638 >Historically "fair skinned" people have thought themselves superior Hahaha I love comments like this. Acting like we DIDN'T take over a full quarter of the globe and prove ourselves superior in every single way.

Anonymous Tue May 24 05:55:25 2011 No.3112562

>>3111932
Second this, at least that's the way it is/was in Asian cultures. I'm white btw, dark girls gross me out. I need to see what your pupils are doing to be able to effectively communicate with you. Girls with dark eyes usually strike me as crazy, like cut off your dick crazy.

Anonymous Tue May 24 05:58:25 2011 No.3112565

Also, has anyone seen the CDC's statistics for American genital herpes infection between the ages of 15-55? It's broken down into race...

White chicks have the lowest chance of having herpes at 11%
Guess which race is highest?

God I love my disease-free penis.
(mostly because nobody else will love it, foreveralone.jpg)

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 05:59:25 2011 No.3112566 >>3112545 correlation does not imply causation

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 05:59:25 2011 No.3112567 I like me some tanned girls, well not orange but healthy. I myself am pale as fuck though, and hate it. Hope to get some color in the summer.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 06:01:25 2011 No.3112574 >>3112566 Wrong, it DOES imply but not prove.

Anonymous Tue May 24 06:01:25 2011 No.3112577

>>3112566
Oh yeah the British East India company just happened to make mice meat of India. The Empire just happened to totally own China through the opium trade. Africa, South America and North America were just conquered because...well because. I love people like you, I really do.
It really is the "non-racists' who ignore history.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 06:02:25 2011 No.3112579 >>3112565 and blacks have the least chance of aspergers

Anonymous Tue May 24 06:05:25 2011 No.3112582

>>3112577
yes. and what has this to do with skin colour?

it was culture that did this, not genetics.

almost all racism is due to correlating a very visible irrelevance (skin colour) with other factors.

north european (so north-american) culture is superior, but this has fuck all to do with genetics.

in previous times other cultures were superior.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 06:07:25 2011 No.3112585 >>3112577 >very unscientific post you need to get your variable right. you may as well say lactose tolerant races conquered the world. it's true, but it makes as much sense scientifically.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 06:07:25 2011 No.3112586 >>3112585 lol lactose tolerant master race checking in

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 06:09:25 2011 No.3112588 >>3112582 And then theres THIS asshole. Who thinks the only thing different is the SKIN COLOUR, seriously how fucking ignorant are you? Other than that I agree with you 100% >>3112585 Hmm...I'm sensing you have no point...please clarify.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 06:10:25 2011 No.3112590 >>3112577 >i love people like you taxi driver detected

Anonymous Tue May 24 06:13:25 2011 No.3112598

>>3112588
this asshole is saying the differences are cultural and not genetic. these differences are vast, massive, they are the differences between a cave man and his descendants Leonardo da Vince or Brian fucking Cox.

the genetic differences between the races are tiny in comparison.

yet retards like you are just slaves to the conspicuous for your explanations.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 06:15:25 2011 No.3112602 >>3112598 So you admit white culture is better than black culture? Also hey guys guys... http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/fury-at-dna-pioneers-theory-africans-are-less-intelligent- than-westerners-394898.html

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 06:16:25 2011 No.3112603 >>3112588 my point is the "asshole's" point. he says it best here >>3112598 >cave man and renaissance man have same DNA. i like this, will use it.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 06:18:25 2011 No.3112608 >>3112603 So...when someone says ni66ers are "stuck in the stone age" they aren't wrong in the least?

Anonymous Tue May 24 06:19:25 2011 No.3112609

>>3111915
>>3111915
>>3111915
>>3111915
>>3111915

/thread

seriously folks, it honestly just comes down to this. Mycaenaen art was pretty crude when it came to representing the sexes, so they used skin colour; darker were males, pale females, because quite frankly,
>>3110975

Anonymous Tue May 24 06:20:25 2011 No.3112613

>>3112602
>still naming things based on irrelevance.

i happily admit european culture is better than african, yes. this is obvious. i would add "better" is a hugely unscientific term, so we're entering into subjective taste here.

but i don't correlate this with the irrelevance of skin colour (and so by implication with genetics). only racist twats with poor intelligence and zero understanding of science such as yourself do this.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 06:21:25 2011 No.3112617 >>3112608 of course they are, wanker, on so many levels

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 06:22:25 2011 No.3112618 >>3111915 >>3112609 So you're saying even though black/indigenous people for thousand of years had no "indoor upper class" they prefer paler women? I'm afraid you got no dice there broskis.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 06:23:25 2011 No.3112622 >>3112617 And why are they? You know what most Britons did when Rome invaded? They adopted the clearly superior culture and grew from it. You know what coons did when invaded? Ate shit and died.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 06:25:25 2011 No.3112625 >>3112613 Why then SIR do people freely admit separate breeds of animal have varying intelligence, yet not so with humans? ALSO DID YOU SEE THE LINK, JUST CHECKING, VERY GOOD SIR I'M SURE YOU READ THE WHOLE THING.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 06:25:25 2011 No.3112626 >>3112608 can't tell if troll or really dumb

>>	Scientist !!ThFjnJh4EkH Tue May 24 06:27:25 2011 No.3112630 >>3112625 BECAUSE THE EVIDENCE IS THAT THERE IS MORE GENETIC DIVERSITY BETWEEN THE BREEDS OF ANIMALS THAN WITH THE RACES OF HUMANS. ALSO, CAPS LOCK IS CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL, BUT EVEN WITH CRUISE CONTROL YOU STILL HAVE TO STEER.

Anonymous Tue May 24 06:27:25 2011 No.3112633

>>3112622
no, coons are adopting western culture massively, and being laughed at by westerners for doing it badly, just like britons were laughed at by romans.

i think you have mild autism as you can't step outside your subjective position and view things globally

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 06:29:25 2011 No.3112639 >>3112625 because races are not species. wait, you didn't realise that? hahahaha

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 06:31:25 2011 No.3112641 >>3112633 >>3112630 Both of you explain what the fuck you're talking about. 33 just needs some citation natuarlly. 30, just rephrase your entire fucking statement. How would I "view things globally" or whatever the fuck you're trying to say?

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 06:32:25 2011 No.3112648 >>3112639 >confuses breeds with species >laughs at me I just feel bad for you man.

Scientist !!ThFjnJh4EkH Tue May 24 06:34:25 2011 No.3112652

>>3112641
Got those mixed up. And sorry, I don't have citations offhand, though I have heard that chimps in the same troop have measurably more genetic diversity than humans on other sides of the planet with wildly different ethnicities.

On that alone, it seems that there is almost no difference between the "races". Of course, find me sufficient evidence and I'll change my mind.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 06:35:25 2011 No.3112657 >>3112641 hahahaha proven wanker suggest you study some classics for the roman stuff, tacitus is a good place to start. as for africa adopting western culture, maybe just look around you for a second.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 06:36:25 2011 No.3112662 >>3112652 >find me sufficient evidence and I'll change my mind. right back at you bro. >>3112657 shh

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 06:37:25 2011 No.3112664 i think this thread just passed way over the racist wanker's head. he's stopped responding with reason, he just feels bad for us, or doesn't understand us. look forward to your shit life thicko, and make sure you blame others for it.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 06:40:25 2011 No.3112675 >>3112664 >hippy runs out of steam >falls back on insults >white man keeps ruling the world till Asians take over

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 06:45:25 2011 No.3112685 >>3112618 Woman wren't out in the sun as much as men, twat

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 06:47:25 2011 No.3112688 >>3110952 I only like dark skin, dark hair, eyes. >Pale white 3d pig disgusting

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 06:47:25 2011 No.3112689 >>3112685 Yes they were. Of course they were. Wtf?

Anonymous Tue May 24 06:52:25 2011 No.3112693

>>3112689

No, shit head. The world that isn't YOROPE is not a desert.

Read hunter/gatherers or farmers. In either case, the men did the work (usually out in the sun), while woman took care of shit and made food (usually under something, away from the sun).

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 06:56:25 2011 No.3112700 >>3112693 No shit head. Women usually work the fields as much as men in every culture, not the same tasks but they were out there just as much. Also to gather water etc. Seriously man, you aren't serious are you?

Anonymous Tue May 24 06:57:25 2011 No.3112704

>>3112675
hippy? i'm a trainee futures analyst. a hardcore capitalist. not as nice a job as it used to be though. but i'm guessing it's better than shelf stacker or burger flipper or whatever it is you do.

anyway, you are still making the same error. i'll say it again but you'll probably not understand it. again.

you mix huge differences in culture with absolutely tiny but very visible differences in genetics to do with environmental factors (skin colour etc) and call this mixture of ideas "race".

as both culture and skin colour is passed from parents to children (by totally different mechanisms) you think these are somehow innate and connected. when only the irrelevant one (the genetic one) is innate.

this error is so blindingly obvious and easy to unpick that any one who persists with it is being wilfully ignorant. but racists are known for being just that, aren't they.

now go climb under whatever rock you live uner, or respond, it won't make any difference.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 07:00:25 2011 No.3112710 >>3112704 >still saying "skin colour" >missed my point earlier >still has the AUDACITY to talk shit to me please go away.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 07:00:25 2011 No.3112712 >>3110952 >>3110952 Emily Browning. Do want.

Anonymous Tue May 24 07:07:25 2011 No.3112729
File: 15 KB, 300x180, _1889788_laugh300b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>3112710
haha u mad.

you don't understand so u get mad.

probably don't even read post, too many long sentences.

>AUDACITY

all caps

u butt hurt and jelly

girls of all "races" laughing

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 07:08:25 2011 No.3112733 >>3112710 only people who are like 13 years old say things like "you have the audacity to talk to me"

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 07:10:25 2011 No.3112739 File: 14 KB, 630x378, fredgraph.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>3112704 Thanks for contributing.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 07:11:25 2011 No.3112744 File: 8 KB, 175x175, 18.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>3112739

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 07:12:25 2011 No.3112748 >>3112729 >>3112733 You do know that audacity remark was pretty much a joke right? There are honestly times when I feel that there are no smart people left on 4chan.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 07:12:25 2011 No.3112749 File: 51 KB, 550x932, photo117.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] She is wonderful, isn't she?

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 07:14:25 2011 No.3112751 File: 63 KB, 550x778, photo96.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Why is it that men cross-culturally, no matter which continent they originate, prefer Emily Browning over other actresses?

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 07:17:25 2011 No.3112758 File: 191 KB, 1500x984, Emily browning.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	m1ckey !dkJI/P7Y32 Tue May 24 07:18:25 2011 No.3112760 >>3112739 lol look at this guy he thinks futures analysts work in central banks, controlling monetary policy and MB. Now go on, tell us how you _know_ it causes inflation!

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 07:18:25 2011 No.3112761 File: 47 KB, 550x757, photo93.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 07:19:25 2011 No.3112767 >>3112760 > you _know_ it causes inflation why did you underscore here?

>>	m1ckey !dkJI/P7Y32 Tue May 24 07:20:25 2011 No.3112768 btw moar emily please

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 07:21:25 2011 No.3112773 File: 15 KB, 369x550, browning_gallery__369x5500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>3112760 This thread is now Emily Browning because the original topic was ridiculous.

>>	m1ckey !dkJI/P7Y32 Tue May 24 07:21:25 2011 No.3112776 >>3112767 my way of underlining for emphasis.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 07:23:25 2011 No.3112780 File: 34 KB, 502x600, photo84.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>3112768 More Emily for all ^_^ She is a really cool person, she's down to earth and she wants to study philosophy. Shes not one of those airheaded model types.

>>	m1ckey !dkJI/P7Y32 Tue May 24 07:24:25 2011 No.3112783 >>3112773 agreed, racebaiting is low-level trolling.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 07:26:25 2011 No.3112793 File: 49 KB, 550x750, photo94.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 07:26:25 2011 No.3112796 >>3112780 uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh I had (have) the biggest crush on her.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 07:29:25 2011 No.3112803 >>3112783 Aye. To save the thread lets each name 2 significant black scientists of note. ..... you guys start.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 07:30:25 2011 No.3112806 File: 91 KB, 550x778, photo97.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] I can't bring myself to fap over Emily, that would feel wrong to me even though we're the same age lol.

>>	m1ckey !dkJI/P7Y32 Tue May 24 07:33:25 2011 No.3112809 >>3112803 George Carver and Benjamin Banneker?

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 07:33:25 2011 No.3112810 >>3112751 I don't really know her, but she looks familiar. Where is she from?

Anonymous Tue May 24 07:34:25 2011 No.3112811
File: 30 KB, 454x667, S2S9Q0_large.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>3112796

Same man. When I heard her on a podcast I was kinda hoping that she was a bitch, but she is really nice and funny too. Which made it even more painful that she will never be mine haha. I think she's dating some douche in a pop rock band >.>

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 07:35:25 2011 No.3112814 >>3112810 She's an Australian actress, probably her most famous role was as the girl in Lemony Snickett's A Series Of Unfortunate Events.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 07:36:25 2011 No.3112816 >>3112809 The peanut guy (who we just DONT hear enough of) and what did the other guy do of note?

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 07:38:25 2011 No.3112818 >>3112814 Oh shoot, yeah that pale chick in the movie. Thanks anon, her pic's been bugging more since I saw this thread.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 07:39:25 2011 No.3112822 >>3112818 >her pic's been bugging more since I saw this thread. her pic's been bugging ME since I saw this thread. minor fix.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 07:46:25 2011 No.3112844 File: 73 KB, 781x600, Emily_Browning_2010_Comic-Con_Cropped.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] ewwwwwwwwww

m1ckey !dkJI/P7Y32 Tue May 24 07:48:25 2011 No.3112846

>>3112816
I forget, something related to mathematics and astronomy? Ok, this is actually pretty tough.

And about the monetary base, much of the increase can be attributed to excess reserves held by banks - these accrue interest, which serve as an incentive for banks to not lend them out. I think there's a report by Deutsche Bank that talks about this, pretty interesting stuff. If anyone's interested Ill find it on my comp when Im sober.

>>	m1ckey !dkJI/P7Y32 Tue May 24 07:50:25 2011 No.3112853 I wonder where trainee futures analsyt is. Fapping?

>>	m1ckey !dkJI/P7Y32 Tue May 24 07:55:25 2011 No.3112865 >>3112846 I mean the report talks about excess reserves making QE2 ineffective. And captcha sux

>>	m1ckey !dkJI/P7Y32 Tue May 24 07:59:25 2011 No.3112872 >>3112865 *interest on excess reserves

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 08:07:25 2011 No.3112889 ITT Aspergers and the lives it blights.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 08:13:25 2011 No.3112911 >>3112177 I have flaming red hair and I am immune to AIDS. Deal with it chinks.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 08:16:25 2011 No.3112919 FACT, noone wants to get raped by a savage niggger, thus everyone wants to be white, except for jews who want to be black.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 08:18:25 2011 No.3112923 Also, Jew decided, after taking over the media, that Asians are to be irrelevant, and only good for chattel to sell crap to. Don't believe me, turn on the TV.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 08:27:25 2011 No.3112961 >>3112844 Oh god I hope that's for a role! If it was black hair it would look sexier but that just looks gross. Also exaggerates her broad face :S

Anonymous Tue May 24 08:33:25 2011 No.3112981
File: 10 KB, 259x194, adrianalima..jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

I only like fair skinned girls in a couple of cases. The skin has to literally have zero blemishes, any hair color can work though. Black hair with perfect white skin = sexy, blond hair and perfect white skin = angel, brown hair and perfect white skin = ...still hot. Other than that if they don't have perfect skin, tan all the way.

Pic very related

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 08:33:25 2011 No.3112983 File: 53 KB, 417x594, Emily+Browning+Sucker+Punch+Red+Carpet+2010+Ujg4kA9wGVjl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>3112961

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 08:49:25 2011 No.3113027 >>3112983 Awww she's still adorable! I take it all back Emily! :D

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 09:00:25 2011 No.3113059 File: 809 KB, 1996x3000, hr_Face_Browning2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>3113027

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 09:06:25 2011 No.3113078 >>3112981 Even a tan like that is a far cry from the standard Pure African Negroid though.

Anonymous Tue May 24 09:10:25 2011 No.3113095
File: 48 KB, 1024x768, Halle_Berry_pictures5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>3113078
Yeah but african negroids are not attractive because of their skin color but because of their bone structure. Look at Halle Berry, if you wouldn't fuck that I don't know what you would hit.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 09:11:25 2011 No.3113100 >>3113095 are not unattractive*

>>	EK FAN CLUB Tue May 24 09:12:25 2011 No.3113102 >>3113095 Halle Berry has an ugly face, and a man's body.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 09:13:25 2011 No.3113103 >>3113095 yes but she's about as dark as some Italians. I know what you mean about bone structure but I do find very dark skin most off putting.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 09:15:25 2011 No.3113111 >>3113102 >>3113102 You just have shit taste.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 09:23:25 2011 No.3113122 File: 24 KB, 320x240, 4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>3113103 Your right... The majority of black women are hideous.

>>	EK FAN CLUB Tue May 24 09:24:25 2011 No.3113131 >>3113111 I'm not aroused by ugly women with skinny, bony bodies, and that's considered bad taste? Whatever bro.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 09:24:25 2011 No.3113136 File: 292 KB, 820x1042, Face_Fey.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] randomly posting lovely vid of gal which fits the description perfectly http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3_GkjCMrZw

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 09:28:25 2011 No.3113143 >>3113131 >skinny bony women >implying that this is skinny and bony and not just fit and sexy >>3113122 I would hold her in my arms and fuck the shit out of her.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 09:38:25 2011 No.3113164 >>3113111 Why is it that /sci/ was reduced to people who choke up chunks of blooded subjectivity in threads with potential merit to them? What happened /sci/?

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 09:40:25 2011 No.3113170 >>3113164 The majority of normal human beings find Halle Berry to be extremely attractive. If one faggot tripfag disagrees of course it's apparent that he is an exception and has shit taste.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 09:55:25 2011 No.3113232 >>3113170 Source, you worthless cunt. People like you don't deserve to live.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 10:44:25 2011 No.3113357 >>3112633 > just like britons were laughed at by romans You mean the Britons that broke off from Rome before anyone and flourished?

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 11:55:25 2011 No.3113723 >>3113232 type on google "Halle Berry most beautiful woman", I am sure there is no exact statistic but this should be enough to get my point across.

a strong ai Tue May 24 12:24:25 2011 No.3113848

I like pale skinned snow princesses. I don't know why. I thought tan was sexy, but seeing a really attractive white skinned girl turned me on in ways that went just beyond physical attraction. I am sure there is a correlation with IQ. They are probably from people who survived really cold weather.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 24 15:45:25 2011 No.3114862 File: 16 KB, 400x300, emily-browning[1].jpg%3Fw%3D300%26h%3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/sci/ - Science & Math