[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 8 KB, 253x199, 1293722112646.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3108755 No.3108755 [Reply] [Original]

Let's see, in multiplication, when you multiply any number by 0, the result will always be 0.

And, as division is the inverse of multiplication, when you divide something by 0, the result will be the divisor, because you have don't have to divide it by anything.

Example. 2 / 0 = 2.

>> No.3108762

How do you give 2 apples to nobody?

>> No.3108774

>>3108762
You can't, thus, you stay if the same number of apples.

>> No.3108776

Other example, you can't divide a pizza in 0 slices.

>> No.3108780

>>3108762
If you have nobody to give it to, you will still have 2 apples.

2.

>> No.3108782

>Let's see, in multiplication, when you multiply any number by 0, the result will always be 0.
4/2=2 so 4=2x2
4/0=?? so 4=??x0

there you go OP.

>> No.3108787

OP has one of the biggest minds ever

>> No.3108788

>>3108774
so tell me how many apples does nobody get?

>> No.3108791

>>3108788
Nobody doesn't exist so they cannot have any apples to begin with, nor can they receive them.

>> No.3108793

>>3108791
exactly, therefore div by zero is undefined, as giving nobody some apples is undefined

>> No.3108800

>>3108793
But it all begins with the 2 apples. There are 2 apples before anything happens.

The 2 apples never change.

>> No.3108805

Division is just an alternative way of writing a multiplication that is less then one in the form of the numbers written's inverse; division don't really exist and is just a form of wighting. 1/0 would be the inverse of zero: the number you have to multiply with to counter a multiplication with zero.

therefore: 0*2/0 should be 2. however that does not say anything of what number 1/0 is.

>> No.3108811

>>3108762

2 schrondinger apples give to nobody and they don't

>> No.3108813

So take a pizza and six people We divide one pizza by 6 so each person gets 1/6 of a pizza. If we don't slice up the pizza or give it out we divide 1/0. And it equals 0 since no one got a piece.

1/0=0

learn2math

>> No.3108819

>>3108755
No, 0 is NOT the multiplicative identity, 1 is. 0 is the additive identity. Fuck head.

This is the same reason that 0^0 = 1 and that 0! = 1 and that 0+0 = 0 and that 0-0 = 0.

>> No.3108847

ITT: trolls trolling trolls who are being trolled

>> No.3108860

>>3108813

No if you have a pizza that you don't cut, you have one pizza. If you cut it up you have 6 slices of pizza instead of one pizza.

Saying 1/0 is like saying if you don't cut up the pizza, the pizza doesn't exist. But it does. so it's 1/1.

0 * n = 0
0 = 0/n
0/0 = n
if n is any number, then 0/0 = 1. It also = 2. or 3. or 5. or 28458728798. I can be anything, which is bad. If we're going to explore numbers and create rules, then the rules must be useful and be self-consistent. we know that 0/0 can't possible equal any and ever number. Because n/n = 1. Having all six slices of pizza is having a whole pizza. 6/6 = 1.

>> No.3108878

>>3108860

no ur wrong. a full pizza is one, but it has no slices.

one pizza divided into 0 slices is 0 slices.

>> No.3108882

>Implying division has anything to do with apples or pizzas

>> No.3108886

Please remove yourselves from the gene pool.

>> No.3108892

>>3108819
>0^0 = 1
Uhhh nope.

>> No.3108909

I will now have more respect to pizza bakers.

>> No.3108912

>>3108755
Shut up
zero in the numerator equals zero, because you can have zero parts of 2, it means you have nothing of the whole. A zero in the denominator is undefined because you can't have 2 parts of zero, that doesn't make sense. Two parts of nothing?
7/10

>> No.3108920

okay so like how there are imahinary numbers we should make something for 1/0. so 1/0=r.

now look at all the math we can do.

7/0=7r

n=1/r
n=1/(1/0)
n=0

anyways i hop this helps yiu guys understand maths a bit ore

>> No.3108939
File: 74 KB, 640x512, 1304432687589.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3108939

Wrong... if you have a bag of sweeties and no-one to give them to the sweeties will last forever, thusly anything divided by zero is infinite. Only dividing by 1 gives the same starting number.

>> No.3109674

I'ma bump this thread.

>> No.3109695

>>3109674
fuck off op, no one cares about your retarded troll thread

>> No.3109700

>>3109695
Actually, I'm not OP. I've been waiting 2 hours for this thread to die, and now, I'm bringing it back to life.

>> No.3109704

Yeah, but who was phone?

>> No.3109708

>>3108939
this

>> No.3109707

"...as division is the inverse of multiplication, when you divide something by 0, the result will be the divisor, because you have don't have to divide it by anything."

I'm pretty sure that this is incorrect. This is how I'm thinking of it: "If I don't divide it among any groups, I have the same amount." But notice, I am still a group. This is the same as dividing by one. Dividing by zero is so weird because it means nothing.

I see where you're coming from, and it looks pretty complaisant at a distance. But just remember - if you think that you just thought up something profoundly wrong with the state of mathematics, and the first place you go is 4chan... you're probably the one that's in the wrong

>> No.3109713

When you have 2 apples and you give them to nobody you don't give them at all. There should be NO equation, there was no giving of the apples. Stop with the apples.

>> No.3109714
File: 29 KB, 200x200, consider.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3109714

3 x 4 = 12

12 / 4 = 3

2 x 0 = 0

0 / 0 = 2

>> No.3109725

>>3108776
YOU CAN IF YOU KEEP CUTTING THEM

INB4 INFINITY CUTS EXISTS

>> No.3109824

OP is a noob in mathematics, let me show you how it's done.

2/0 = x <=> 2=x*0 <=> 2 = 0

The reason why it's not defined is that doing anything to 0 will result in making any number zero, be it 1, 100 or a trillion.

>> No.3109834

OP is a noob in mathematics, let me show you how it's done.

2/0 = x <=> 2=x*0 <=> 2 = 0

The reason why it's not defined is that doing anything to 0 will result in making any number zero, be it 1, 100 or a trillion.

captcha: laternisileo anal

>> No.3109887

Plenty of structures have zero-divisibility, just look at, say, <span class="math"> \mathbb Z / 6 \mathbb Z [/eqn], where [2]*[3] = 0.[/spoiler]