[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 44 KB, 387x256, infinity.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3105392 No.3105392 [Reply] [Original]

Hey /sci/,

A God here (there are many of us), here is the answer to everything. Consider homo-sapien science fix'd.

You're welcome.

>> No.3105400
File: 66 KB, 443x359, 1295492994229.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3105400

>> No.3105414

ITT: we derive breakthroughs in physics by studying Orange Tube theory.

Quantum tunneling? The tunnels must be orange!

We can't find the Higgs boson because it hides out in the tube all the time!

Schrödinger's cat was dead and alive and in an orange tube.

>> No.3105417
File: 480 B, 116x34, Aleph_No.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3105417

>> No.3105421

Fuck I love glowing rubber-bands.

>> No.3105426

Planets always travel in ellipses. A closed tube can be stretched into an ellipse.

Check and mate, non-tube-theists.

>> No.3105447

If you pass an orange tube through two slits it interferes with itself. The bands alternate between constructube and destructube. This is called the "Orange Slit Experiment."

>> No.3105451

>>3105414
I think the most compelling evidence for orange tube theory is the success of the double orange juice experiment. Two glasses of orange juice is twice as much orange as one glass!

>> No.3105500

Thanks to Heisenband's Uncertaintube Principipe, there is a limit on how precisely one can know both a particle's orangess and its tubeitude.

>> No.3105521

According to Einstein's theory of Orange Relativity, the faster one tubes, the more orange it gets.

>> No.3105531
File: 19 KB, 383x284, ted-stevens.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3105531

>> No.3105556

>>3105531
Dr. Stevens has been kind enough to offer to lecture on his field work in tube theory.

>> No.3105581

>>3105392

HURR DURR


WHAT HE'S TRYING TO SAY IS THAT THE SCIENCE WE USED TODAY HAS BARRIERS AND LIMITATIONS THAT WILL NEVER ALLOW US TO MAKE TRUE GROUNDBREAKING DISCOVERIES.