[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 58 KB, 717x682, niger.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3085833 No.3085833 [Reply] [Original]

need help with b) (ii)
and (c)

>> No.3085841

and guys please let me know if i did any mistakes in any other excercises <3

>> No.3085851

i accept paypal if you're interested

>> No.3085865

>>3085851
sure mang

>> No.3085869

>>3085851
how much would you want from me

>> No.3085874

Impulse momentum relation. Use it son!

>> No.3085875

>>3085869
I wasn't serious.

>> No.3085881

>>3085875
neither was I.

>> No.3085885

>>3085869
lol

>> No.3085893

>>3085874
so delta p=mass(delta v) right?

>> No.3085901

i checked your other answers, they are all correct (although i did notice the rounding on 1c, which makes your answer slightly innacurate, but nevermind.)

b.2. if its momentum goes from 4.55 to 0 in 0.002 seconds, then per second that is 4.55/0.002 = 2275.

c. 2275 is exactly the same as your answer for 2.1.ii. so force can be expressed as momentum change per second, as the answers are the same...

>> No.3085905

force is change in momentum over time. so b(ii) is basically a question to find the force acting on the bullet.

>that's £10 for 2seconds of my time

>> No.3085908

Yes but don't forget F⌂t=m⌂v

>> No.3085911

>>3085901
dude, EK, thank you mang. You are always helping me <3
Its nice to know that there are good people on sci willing to help
<3 you mang

>> No.3085924
File: 3 KB, 126x113, zh4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3085924

>>3085911
oh wow, i helped you before?
nice!
i'm happy to help. :)

>> No.3085934

>>3085924
EK, you are so good to me
my sadness is now a memory
for, now, all things I clearly see
—signed, your faithful devotee

>> No.3085940
File: 3 KB, 125x95, zh1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3085940

>>3085934
yay! a poet!
<3

>> No.3085953

>>3085940
>>3085924
So is EK the permed blonde or the short/straight redhead? Why does she post pictures of two different people?

>> No.3085961

>>3085953
She's neither. Those are her YouTube idols and primary sources of education.

>> No.3085988

>>3085953
...what redhead?

>> No.3085994

>>3085988
The one you post sometimes... Maybe the hair is dark brown, hard to tell.

>> No.3086005
File: 14 KB, 478x357, 126549.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3086005

>>3085994
yeh, brown. She isn't a redhead...has never been i think.

>> No.3086019

>>3086005
>>3085940
>>3085961
Ok, so neither of these is EK. I have no idea why I care, I guess seeing a female on /sci/ just shocks and awes me. It probably shouldn't.

>> No.3086098
File: 57 KB, 840x789, EK.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3086098

>>3085953
<
Neither, she's this ugly bitch.

>> No.3086101

>>3086098
for the 3rd and final time, that isnt me and i have never posted my own pictures on here you stupid fucking faggot!

>> No.3086110
File: 33 KB, 330x250, 1292794392488.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3086110

>>3086101

Stop lying. You know that's your ugly mug.

>> No.3086114
File: 131 KB, 360x360, 1295108841771.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3086114

>>3086101

>> No.3086123
File: 3 KB, 126x124, zb2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3086123

>>3086110
if i was going to finally out myself and post a picture here, why the fuck would it be some stupid assed 'doubles get' picture!??
i would be doing something scientific and zoological...me in my labcoat, with a parakeet on my shoulder perhaps...
anyway, point is, it isn't me, and you dont have a fucking clue what you are talking about.

>> No.3086130
File: 27 KB, 512x384, 1305279186017.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3086130

>>3086123

>> No.3086132

>>3086101
Haha. Everytime I come on here you are always in an argument with someone. I will leave you to it, see you tonight.

>> No.3086133

>>3086123
>why the fuck would it be some stupid assed 'doubles get' picture!??
Because you are a stupid person.

>> No.3086136

>>3086123
Wow, that's quite a long defensive post you got there. A little too defensive...

>> No.3086139

You gotta understand the confusion you cause when you consistently post pictures of the same person with expressions that agree with your text. People will start to think they're pictures of you.

Using a cartoon would have been a lot wiser in this respect.

>> No.3086143
File: 249 KB, 590x775, 1292560808969.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3086143

>>3086123

Even if it isn't your picture, I know you are ugly.

And I'm not just saying that to goad you into posting a picture of yourself.
It's just the way you talk and act that lets me know you are ugly.

Plus, that picture is you. Also, U MAD??!?!

>> No.3086151

>>3086130
what the fuck does that even mean??

>>3086132
FYI Hitler was a vegetarian. umad?

>>3086139
I often do post cartoons, but not always, and it doesn't matter, people arn't stupid. its not like we all presume >130 actually is the guy holding the bat even though it isn't a cartoon...

>> No.3086153

>>3086136
As she's always so eager to point out, her defensive posts are a sign of how little she cares about your opinion. See, she couldn't give a fuck, and that's why she's gonna respond to each and every single personal attack.

>> No.3086164

>>3086151
>FYI Hitler was a vegetarian. umad?
You learned this just a few hours ago and even proudly announced that you're gonna "troll" people with it. You're such a pathetic waste of flesh.

>> No.3086170
File: 4 KB, 126x105, fullretard.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3086170

>>3086143
>implying you can accurately judge a persons appearance by what they type.
lol, do Harriet.
Shes what? tall? short? fat? thin?
use your mighty newfound super-power, faggot.

>> No.3086174

>>3086170
Smarter and less insecure than you.

>> No.3086188

>>3086170

>implying you can't

>> No.3086189

>>3086174
HA! wrong.
on both counts.
i am not insecure at all, and she certainly isn't smarter than me, she's probably honest enough to admit that herself if she is still here... (she was in high school with me as well, we took most of the same classes together)

>> No.3086203

>>3086170

Who the hell is harriet?

>> No.3086206

>>3086203
you fucking blind?
>>3086132
>name field

>> No.3086211

>>3086151
But we know that that's a picture of Jason Alexander and he's most likely NOT that poster.

Your pictures look like candid photos taken in front of a computer, aren't recognized to be a celebrity, and again, support what you're saying.

Look how much of this thread is about what you do or do not look like. Look how consistently you respond to the smallest accusations, whether or not they're trolls. You may say you're not insecure but your posting behavior really betrays the opposite.

>> No.3086213
File: 58 KB, 425x428, salad-woman-4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3086213

>>3086189

>i am not insecure at all

>> No.3086220

EK

>monstrous troll
>insecure little girl

Pick one

>> No.3086238

>>3086211
yes, this thread has been derailed long enough, i was just clearing up any misconception OP might have had, since the haters swooped down with their lies.
I've said my piece, OP will believe me and not the haters, so its all fine. theres nothing else I need to say.
and /thread (seeing as i already solved it earlier, before it was derailed)

>> No.3086256

>>3086238

>lies
>implying you're not fugly

Bitch please. Stop denying the train wreck you call your face.

>> No.3086407

>>3086220

Insecure little girl. She's not smart enough to be a monstrous troll.