[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 15 KB, 300x300, 1296507904363.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3002121 No.3002121 [Reply] [Original]

Scientifically prove that god doesn't exist.

>> No.3002127
File: 41 KB, 437x400, obvious-troll.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3002127

>> No.3002144

God said he'd never flood the earth again. The oceans exist.

.
.. God is a liar or non-existent.

>> No.3002150

>>3002144
But what if God both lies and tells the truth? (can't have truth without lie).

>> No.3002151

Scientifically prove that Mewtwo doesn't exist.

>> No.3002185

If god exists, then I ask that he strike me down with lightning as soon as I finish typing this sentence.
It has not happened.
Therefore, god does not exist.
The fact that any event attributed to god can be easily explained otherwise or follows the law of probability strongly suggests no god.

1. God is said to be all-powerful and all-benevolent
2. Humanity is still in a state of strife
3. Therefore, god doesn't exist.

>> No.3002207

>>3002121
1. Completely eliminate religion from the earth and from human knowledge, including any knowledgeable researchers performing this experiment, such that no remaining humans or other non-deities could discover any history of religion through physical evidence.
2. If there is a god, god will cause religion appear amongst the remaining population.

QED.


let's do it.

>> No.3002219

>>3002185
>1. God is said to be all-powerful and all-benevolent
>2. Humanity is still in a state of strife


you are fucking retarded.
i hate when people say that.

There is an infinite amount of possible unknown explanations to why god might have wanted us to have free will and opinion.

That doesn't mean he doesn't exist. lol its almost laughable that people say this

>> No.3002529

1. God identified as being infallible, cannot be wrong or he would not be God.
2. God speaks through Bible. Bible identified as word of God. Bible (God's word) identified as infallible, though also largely open to imperfect human interpretation.
3. Bible still contains statements/claims whether explicit or implicit that TO THIS DAY pertain to our physical world - e.g. age of Earth, among others.
4. Scientifically test aforementioned claims/statements, again e.g. age of Earth. Scientific quantity =/= quantity stated/claimd in bible.
5. Bible flawed/wrong.
6. God flawed/wrong.
7. Time for lunch.

>> No.3002535

Okay, I'll bite.

The null hypothesis is that god doesn't exist.

Now it's your turn. Go.

>> No.3002537
File: 34 KB, 240x249, trollthread.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3002537

>scientifically
>prove something doesn't exist

>> No.3002545

Scientifically prove that I don't have that proof. Not so fun when you have to prove a negative, eh?

>> No.3002550

If it can be scientifically proven that round squares do not exist, it can be scientifically proven that gods do not exist.

They both are internally-inconsistent and self-contradictory.

>> No.3002559

>>3002219
If god is all powerful, why can't he create a world that simultaneously has free will and no evil? Since logic is a property of our universe and god created our universe, why can't he transcend logic? Doesn't seem all powerful to me.

>> No.3002566

>inb4 this use was b& for this post

>> No.3002569

God is all powerful.

Can he then create a stone so heavy that he himself cannot lift it? If he can do it, he fails. Creating it means he can't lift it, also equalling fail.

Or microwave a burrito so heat he cannot eat it, if you prefer the Simpsons version of this paradox ;)

>> No.3002579

>>3002529

Assumes Christianity is correct.

>>3002185

Assuming that one can command God to do something

Captcha: NOT wingovi

>> No.3002586

>>3002550
everyone in this thread is internally inconsistent and self contradictory and we exist

>> No.3002587

>>3002579
Fine, how about you answer >>3002569 ?

>> No.3002599

>>3002127
And lazy too.

>> No.3002607

>>3002207
but religion could be something that just self propogates among people. a religious experience seems to be a part of the human experience. Take shrooms for example. No really, just take shrooms.

>> No.3002609

Depends on the definiton of God you are using.

>> No.3002619

ITT: OP samefagging, and gullible idiots

>> No.3002629

>>3002609
This anon brings up an important point. Depending on ones definition of god, he could exist for one person and not another. Depending on your definition of 'truth' or 'reality' anything may fall into a similar wavy-gravy state.

god is like this thread. He keeps coming back to ask us if he's here. or something.

>> No.3002646

>make claim
>provide no evidence
>dismiss claim

>> No.3002845
File: 12 KB, 350x352, earth-light.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3002845

TRUTH: God is never wrong.
TRUTH: Church is word of god.
TRUTH:Church says world is flat.