[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 12 KB, 541x270, 6÷2(1+2)=.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2960249 No.2960249 [Reply] [Original]

Let x =1 and y=2
6÷2(x+y)
=6÷(2x+2y)
=6÷(2*1 + 2*2) = 6÷(2+4)
=1
QED

If you think its 9 then you should leave /sci forever
<----- If you're just trolling then /b is that way.

Also i printscreened yesterday the numbers are now:
1: 331'000
9: 438'000

>> No.2960256

l2order of operations.

>> No.2960261

these threads are honestly worse than theist/atheist threads

>> No.2960264

I don't understand how you get 9 from that. BIMDAS, and how you did it both give 1. Someone explain this to me please.

>> No.2960263

it would be nine if it were written as follows
6÷2x(1+2)=9
or
(6÷2) x (1+2)=9
but the question was
6÷2(1+2)= 1

>> No.2960267

6÷2(2+1)
=6÷2*(2+1)
=6÷2*3
=3*3
=9

>> No.2960268

>>2960264
you multiply the bracket multiplication first ie.
2(3). if it were 2x(3) then it'd be 9

>> No.2960274

>>2960268
2(3) = 2*(3).
2(3) is merely shorthand.
Go back to school.

>> No.2960276

Oh my christ, somebody please just type up a formal proof so we can all copypasta. This is worse than the .999... = 1 threads.

>mfw I realized that these haven't all been trolls all along and some people really are this ignorant
>mfw I have to resort to wolframalpha for some fucking arithmetic

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=6%C3%B72%281%2B2%29

>> No.2960280

>>2960276
see
>>2960267
for formal proof.

>> No.2960288

>>2960276
wolfraalpha isnt right!!
>>2960274
and ditto go back to school
i got an A* at GCSE and A in maths and B in further Maths. taking engineering.
what do u do?

>> No.2960290

>>2960288
apparently i school engineers in basic order of operations mathematics.

>> No.2960291

>>2960264

You treat the division sign like a single operator, that is you do not assume it applies to the rest of the expression. Type it into a TI calculator, you will get 9. A number against a paren is treated as having an implicit multiplication sign. Order of operations would then say that the division by 2 and multiplication of (2+1) have equal priority, not the retarded assumption that an implicit division operator occurs between the 2 and the (2+1).

tl;dr: It's fucking 9 morons.

>> No.2960298

>>2960276
wolfram alpha made 6/2 a fraction which makes the answer 9 ( the order was screwed)

>> No.2960301

Let x =1 and y=2
6÷2(x+y)
=3(x+y)
=3x+3y
=3(1)+3(2)
=9
QED

Left to right. It's not a judgment call or in any way ambiguous. It's the correct order of operations. Go back to 2nd grade. Multiplication and Division have equal priority, and the fact that the multiplication is implied by being written next to a bracket is completely irrelevant.

>> No.2960302

>>2960267
>>2960267
>>2960267
>>2960267
this this this. a thousand times this. basic order of operations. how the fuck is this even being debated?

>> No.2960303

>>2960264

I'm retarded. BIMDAS gives nine.

>> No.2960305

>>2960290
lol ur a faggot.
u work for mcdonalds. bet u think ur really cleaver quoting a website thats wrong

>> No.2960308

Dumbasses... Parenthesis go FIRST!

6/2(1+2)
6/2(3)
6/6 = 1

>> No.2960310

>>2960305
first point. I did not quote the website and had no knowledge it even existed.
Second. I am in university doing a BSc.
Third. Go get a calculator, type it in as seen. Then go back and revise order of operations. Then kiss my feet. In that order.

>> No.2960312

>>2960301
>>2960301
>>2960301
>>2960301
ahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahhaahahhahahahaha
everyone look at this moron.

>>2960301
>>2960301
>>2960301

>> No.2960314

>>2960308

The numbers inside the brackets, yes. 2 isn't inside the brackets, therefore the division comes first.

>> No.2960317

At this point anyone who honestly believes the answer is supposed to be 1, with no trolling, is genuinely retarded.

I weep for the future of mathematics.

>> No.2960318

>>2960314
Hmm... wait.. yeah Im wrong...

6/2(1+2)
6/2(3)
which means its practically
6/2*3
3*3
9

<.>

>> No.2960319

>>2960310
Read what this guy puts.
>>2960308
>>2960308
>>2960308
>>2960308
beacuse he is right
its 1.

>> No.2960324

>>2960318
>>2960319

lololo

>> No.2960328

>>2960319
Nah brah. the equation reads 6/2(3) yes?
DIVISION AND MULTIPLICATION SHARE THE SAME ORDER OF OPERATIONS.
Thus, 6/2 is performed first. The resultant answer is 3.
3(3) is 9.

2(3) IS NOT A HIGHER ORDER OF PRECEDENCE JUST BECAUSE THE 3 IS IN BRACKETS. IT IS THE SAME AS 2*3 and 2*(3).

>> No.2960330

>>2960314
This
people who think it's 1 dont got their priorities right

>> No.2960334

>>2960317
are you trolling?
coz if u are sir then 9/10
well done. it really makes me angry u seggesting that its 9

>> No.2960342

>>2960328
6/2 > 2(3) > 6÷2 > 2*3
the first q was 6÷2(1+2)=
therefore 1

>> No.2960347

>>2960342
wat

>> No.2960349

6/2(1+2) = 6/2x(1+2) = 6/2x3 = 3x3 = 9
or re-write it to (6x(1+2))/2 = (6x3)/2 = 18/2 = 9
ór re-write it to 6 x 2^-1 x (1+2) = 6 x 2^-1 x 3 -> 6x2^-1 = 3 therefor it becomes 3x3 IS FUCKING NINE ASWELL

>> No.2960362

>>2960349
nope
6÷2(1+2)=?

>> No.2960374

>>2960362
6÷2(1+2)=9 people who get 1 out of this, wrongly interpret this as it being: 6÷(2(1+2)) but you dont divide 6 by (2(1+2)).. the last part ISN'T in brackets or anything. you work out what INSIDE the brackets first (1+2)=3 and then look at the rest of it; 6 / 2 x 3 multiplications and divisions are of the 'same level' so you can just do the rest of it from left to right 6/2 = 3 -> 3 x 3 = 9

>> No.2960381

Fucking PEMDAS, faggots, ever heard of it? Jesus christ some people should go back to middle school.

>> No.2960393

Alright I will settle this

(6/1)*(1/2)*(1/3) = 1

>> No.2960407

>>2960393
(6/1)*(1/2)*(1/3) = 1 you don't multiply by (1/3) .. you multiply by (1+2) (which is exactly.. 3 not (1/3))
combined with (6/1) being exactly 6 it becomes:
6 x (1/2) x 3 IS FUCKING NINE

>> No.2960412

6÷2(x+y)=3(x+y)=3x+3y=3+6=9

>> No.2960414
File: 14 KB, 633x471, trollscience.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2960414

>> No.2960436

<span class="math">6÷2(1+2)=6 \cdot \frac{1}{2} \cdot (1+2)[/spoiler]

>> No.2960439

Is 288 now a meme?

>> No.2960444

>>2960439
why?

>> No.2960486

>>2960288
A+ in Maths B (advanced maths)
A+ in Maths C (further maths)

perfect scores in two university calculus courses. on track for another perfect score in second level university calculus. engineering and science dual major student. answer is 9. come at me bro.

>> No.2960495

Omg how many stupid people do we have here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations

6/2(1+2)=
First we do (1+2) = 3
then 6/2=3

AND 3*3=9 Simple or not

Order of operations

>> No.2960511

>>2960495
you do 2(3) before 6div 2
2(3) is not the same as 2*3

>> No.2960517

2(3) holds more importance than 6÷2 or x for that matter

>> No.2960519
File: 507 KB, 500x1791, zq.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2960519

Answer is 9
Don't argue with google and wolframalpha
l2bodmas
l2maths

>> No.2960523

>>2960511
No fucktard 2(3) is EXACTLY the same as 2x3, if it were 6/(2x(1+2)) YES you would've done 2x(1+2) first and thén divided 6 by that .. but since 2(1+2) (which is exáctly the same as 2x(1+2)) is nót in brackets.. you do 6/2 FIRST and thén multiply by 3

>> No.2960530

>>2960519
loooolol.
sums it up
wheres it from.
actually no matter ill tineye b4 some one shouts at me

>> No.2960537

>>2960530
No worries, I made it a few hrs ago to troll the FB poll

>> No.2960540

>>2960537
could i have a link other than the 4chan
coz i want to give it on fb but i dont want ppl to know im on 4chan lol.
tineye had no results

>> No.2960544

>>2960540
http://i254.photobucket.com/albums/hh101/Magnaen/zq.jpg

>> No.2960554

1+2 = 3
6/2 = 3
3 * 3 = 9..

Bidmas.

Are you all like, 12?

>> No.2960556

>>2960544
thanks

>> No.2960558

>>2960554
its 1!

>> No.2960561

ITT: A barely literate retard claims the answer to be anything other than 9

I don't think a more comprehensive proof could be derived.

QED

>> No.2960595

ITT summerfags shitting up 4chan

>> No.2960612

>>2960595

>Summer
>In the Spring

>> No.2960638

Anyone else curious how many of those facebook voters legitimately got it wrong and didnt vote for the wrong one for the trolls?

>> No.2960644

>>2960638
ye