/sci/ - Science & Math

[Tautoulogic !fcsdUrivQ. No.2886315]

>In the Book of Romans, Chapter 8, verse 28:
>The word of God says that you shall know the truth.

>He says "all things".
>He says "All single things!"
>See not some things.

>but EVERY, SINGLE, THING, works together...
>FOREVER ! ! !

>There is one thing i am sure of,
>i am convinced that i am called by God's own purpose.

>And once you are called by God's purpose, the Bible says all things work together, forever.

- General Buttnaked

[Tautoulogic !fcsdUrivQ. No.2886342]

>>2886315

[sage No.2886381]

>>2886315
Go away Tauto, you are a theistic fool and have nothing to contribute to /sci/, return to /x/.

Also, saged your theist crap.

[Tautoulogic !fcsdUrivQ. No.2886705]

bump

[Anonymous No.2886718]

>Faith

[Anonymous No.2886736]

Derp.

[Tautoulogic !fcsdUrivQ. No.2886771]

>>2886718
>thinking there`s a fine distinction between 'faith' and 'belief, thus 'having faith' by defenition is laughable and 'believing' is not.

stay classy /sci/

[Anonymous No.2886781]

>>2886315
Go back to /b/.

[Anonymous No.2886787]

>>2886781
doesn`t know who he is dealing with

[Anonymous No.2886788]

>>2886771

we dont have faith or 'everlasting' beliefs, we have convictions within the current scientific paradigm, if X can explain Y better than Z, then I stick with X

[Anonymous No.2886789]

Eat the raw hearts of children.

Find god.

[Anonymous No.2886804]

>>2886787
Oh, no, I assure you: I know exactly who I'm dealing with.
Go back to /b/, rejoin your failfaggot brethren.

[Anonymous No.2886811]

>>2886788

>atheism
>not a matter of faith

Pick one.

[Anonymous No.2886823]

>>2886381

Obvious Dawkinsfag is obviou.

[EK !EKFQOBUFnQ No.2886826]

>>2886789

[Tautoulogic !fcsdUrivQ. No.2886828]

>>2886788

>we dont have faith or 'everlasting' beliefs, we have convictions within the current scientific paradigm, if X can explain Y better than Z, then I stick with X

wow that was arrogant.
Who do you think you are to declare someone on the internet has "everlasting beliefs", this wasn`t even the subject. Looks like a bad attempt to disguise your own failing.

Even the motivation on why to rely on sceince requires some belief, perhaps a form of having faith.

[Anonymous No.2886864]

>>2886828

Relying in my senses and rationality is having faith?, good job

On issues like Gods existence only one answer is possible, which is 'I dont know' or 'I dont know yet'.

Habit is the key word, Hobbes wrote about this. what is keeping you from believing that tomorrow gravity will push you upwards? Habit, so far its been acting downwards for everyone. We can never be sure of the universality of X, but we can explain it so far

[Max Planck !!jT+l3v7Nbt6 No.2886894]

>>2886828

>Implying faith is required when evidence is provided.

If you mix 2 Hydrogen atoms and 1 Oxygen atom - Please tell me what that bonds into? Does it bond into something else per chance? If we do this experiment 1,000,000 times how many times does it come out different?

We dont need faith for things we observe. Its clearly evident. I could mix those 2 elements every minute of every day and still get the same result. NO FAITH REQUIRED.

Also go back to /b/

[Anonymous No.2886897]

>tripfag
>quoting bible

nope.avi

[Anonymous No.2886900]

>>2886315
Ha! You believe in all things. I believe that's what we call gullible.

[Anonymous No.2888736]

General Buttnaked was alpha as fuck back in his murderous days

[Anonymous No.2888754]

sage