[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 59 KB, 540x595, 20110408.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2851301 No.2851301 [Reply] [Original]

>> No.2851308,1 [INTERNAL] 

inb4 pattern in pi.

>> No.2851308

sage for ugly fro bitch.

>> No.2851330

>>2851301
I hate both of these types of women. I guess I just hate women in general. The one on the left is just one of those annoying bitches who thinks they are smart and gets good grades in high school, but fails at real stuff so they do some lame memorization based med school shit.

>> No.2851333

lol

>> No.2851339

>>2851330

Dude, the fact that it's a woman makes no fucking difference. If it was a guy speaking, nothing about the comic would change.

>> No.2851346

the one on the right is a girl?

>> No.2851363

>>2851346
See
>>2851339

>> No.2851370
File: 22 KB, 352x349, 20110408after.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2851370

>> No.2851397

>>2851301

> as an _irreducible_ relationship between two numbers.

fix´d

>> No.2851401

>>2851370

Dear god, kill it with fire.

>> No.2851419

>>2851330
>>>/r9k/

>> No.2851425

I don't want to completely diss phd comics, because I haven't seen that much of their shit, but I hate the extreme academic life navel-gazing faggotry that seems to be in 75% of them.

>> No.2851436

>>2851425
>Mixing up SMBC and PHD comics
No.

>> No.2851437

>>2851397
exactly, otherwise you could just say stupid shit like 2*pi/2, 6*pi/(2*3), etc...

>> No.2851459

>>2851339

The setting would change. It wouldn't be set in a kitchen...

>> No.2851507

>>2851397

The important thing isn't being irreducible, but being the quotient of two integers rather than two "numbers." Irreducibility doesn't make sense when you're talking in the reals in general.

>> No.2851518

I though pi was a ratio by definition
The fuck?

>> No.2851519

>>2851301
The A+ math student isn't aware that the definition of a rational number p/q where p and q are integers
The future mathematician doesn't either, apparently

>>2851370
an engineer would consult MATLAB

>> No.2851538

>>2851507

ok

actually thought those were meaning the same thing for that reason

>> No.2851561

>>2851519

The question asked wasn't whether pi was rational, but whether pi could be expressed as a fraction. So A+ Math Student answered the first question because that's the one you'd be expected to be asked, and Future Mathematician pedantically answered the question literally as asked.

>> No.2851565

What's with this guy's boner for female mathematicians?

>> No.2851581

>>2851565

it's an affirmative action draw.

>> No.2851590

>>2851565
He thinks flattering women in his comic will get him laid because he is apparently not an avid student of reality. If he were he would see that virtually every woman is fucking a guy who isn't that nice to her.

>> No.2851599

Isn't the guy on the right a guy?

>> No.2851602

>>2851590
Isn't Zach married?

>> No.2851605

>>2851590

Right, except he's already married. To a biologist. Who's smarter than he is.

Grow up.

>> No.2851613

>>2851397
>irreducible
doesn't make a difference
think before posting

>> No.2851620

Look pi can be defined a number of different ways that all come back to the same irrational number.

but interestingly enough, an infinite sum of rational numbers can create an irrational number. Example: e.

MATH!

>> No.2851630

>>2851620
>infinite sum of rational numbers can be an irrational
no shit
a/10 + b/100 + c/1000 + d/10000 etc

>> No.2851635
File: 1.18 MB, 311x240, 1302044644237.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2851635

>>2851605
>implying he doesn't treat her like shit and that's why they're still married

>> No.2851639

>>2851620
>an infinite sum of rational numbers can create an irrational number
If they couldn't, there wouldn't be ane irrational numbers to begin with.

>> No.2851663

>>2851639
I guess that's clear from the Cauchy way of constructing the real numbers, but not so much from the Dedekind cut method. In any case, that's an intuitive way of thinking about it.

>> No.2851697

>>2851330

QFT.

>> No.2851701

>>2851613

Idiot. Pi/1 is reducible. Now please fuck off troll.

>> No.2851814

>>2851701
So is 2/6, a rational number...

>> No.2851824 [DELETED] 

>>2851814

Am i being trolled?

The fraction you provided is reducible to 1/3, which is a rational number.

>> No.2851831

>>2851814

And?

>> No.2851891
File: 24 KB, 479x317, 1302191991611.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2851891

π can't be expressed as a ratio of two _integers_, which is the definition of a rational number. Either you are all retarded or I got trolled big time. Why do you people always overdo simple things like this?

>> No.2851902

>>2851891

Nobody said anything about ratio of two integers or being rational.

>> No.2851909
File: 547 KB, 4494x5000, 1300654557989.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2851909

>>2851902

you just did

>> No.2851917

>>2851909

> 4494x5000

What the hell man?

>> No.2851923

>>2851814
yes

>> No.2851925
File: 23 KB, 288x499, 13453424.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2851925

>>2851909

>4494x5000

>> No.2851977
File: 21 KB, 216x220, 1297454169820.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2851977

>>2851917
>>2851925

bigger is better

>> No.2851997

>>2851977

That´s what she said... wait... shit.