[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 76 KB, 1050x839, bible.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2807198 No.2807198 [Reply] [Original]

"Can the God hypothesis make predictions? Hmm, let me think about that... yes it can. We can prove the evidence for God to be true, knowing that God is true because of the evidence"

Let's have a little competition. Can you plot a Venn diagram of this man's logic?

>> No.2807202

Except that's not at all what he said.

>> No.2807203

oh look, another religious thread.

>> No.2807209

>>2807202

OP here.
Well, too bad. But still!

>> No.2807217

GTFO

>> No.2807224
File: 4 KB, 183x186, 1301071997437.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2807224

OMG ITS THIS THREAD AGAIN HURR HURR HURRR INB4 ATHEIST EGO COMES IN AND SAYS "NO" AND THEISTS COME IN AND SAYS "YES" HUEHUEUHUH UHUHUHUH HURRRRR HURRR HURR HURRRH URRRR HURR

>> No.2807223

The question was: "What testable predictions does the God hypothesis make?"

Craig said: "If Christianity is true, we should find that Jesus rose from the dead. If you could show that Jesus didn't rise from the dead, that would falsify Christianity. If Theism is true, it would predict that the universe would exhibit characteristics that are designed for intelligent life. If you could show that's false, that would falsify that. If biblical theism is true, the universe should have a beginning. If you could falsify that, that would be a problem for biblical theism. I think that the existence of God is related to the evidence.

>> No.2807228

inafter agnostic going derpderpderpediderp

>> No.2807229

>>2807224
>a deist acting superior about his faith

What else is new?

>> No.2807240
File: 135 KB, 250x250, 1301433976936.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2807240

>>2807229
HURR LETS INSULT EACH OTHER YEEEEEEEAHHHH WE'RE SMART, FOR LIFE, 4 LYFE.

>PARASITICAL SUB-HUMAN AI

>> No.2807238
File: 223 KB, 750x600, 1299846481095.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2807238

>>2807202
Craig said a lot of bullshit. It's amazing how the laws of physics can tolerate the amount of batshit he can spew per unit of time.

Krauss should have raped him but instead he tried to be reasonable.

Inanimate bricks could have performed better in that Q&A session.

WORST. DEBATE. EVER.

>> No.2807246

>>2807240
>implying you're not the one who provoked it

>> No.2807251
File: 72 KB, 400x594, 1293393293093.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2807251

>>2807246