[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

File: 29 KB, 450x407, guido5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Mon Mar 21 23:50:27 2011 No.2750346 [Reply] [Original]

how can you beleive in evolution if it is just a theory (a geuss)?

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 21 23:51:27 2011 No.2750356 not this shit again. saged, hidden, reported

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 21 23:53:27 2011 No.2750363 >>2750356 typical evolutionist darwinist hippie communist. can't even prove his THOERY (that's right, not even a scientific fact) so he resorts to hiding.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 21 23:53:27 2011 No.2750365 You misspelled guess. That's a nice touch.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 21 23:53:27 2011 No.2750364 Gtfo troll.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 21 23:54:27 2011 No.2750369 >>2750365 one mispelling doesn't defeat a solid argument.

>>	sage Anonymous Mon Mar 21 23:56:27 2011 No.2750385 SAGE

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 21 23:56:27 2011 No.2750388 Proof is math based. Science doesn't do proof. Only what it figured out through testing. Also you don't understand the concept of a scientific theory. The theory of gravity seeks to explain gravity.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 21 23:57:27 2011 No.2750396 >>2750388 Garvity is a FACT, not just a theory.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 21 23:59:27 2011 No.2750400 >>2750396 .... Do you even know what science is? Science is HOW something happens. Darwin's theory of evolution isn't the same as pokemon evolution. At least know what the fuck you're talking about if you're going to criticize it.

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 22 00:00:27 2011 No.2750404 >>2750396 Yes, gravity is a fact. The theory of gravity seeks to explain what is actually is. Evolution is also a fact. The theory of evolution seeks to explain how it works.

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 22 00:00:27 2011 No.2750406 If Mod exists, Why does thread?

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 22 00:03:27 2011 No.2750417 the THEORY of Evolution: life came from rocks, and man came from monkeys. while this theory may or may not have supporting proof, it should not be taught as the only theories. there are plenty of other theories out there, such as intelligent design.

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 22 00:08:27 2011 No.2750447 >>2750417 No. Stop right there that is NOT Darwin's theory of evolution.

Anonymous Tue Mar 22 00:08:27 2011 No.2750445

>>2750417
>the THEORY of Evolution: life came from rocks
Uhh, don't confused the Theory of Evolution with Abiogenesis. Typical IDist mistake.

>and man came from monkeys.
We have evidence to support this reasoning. Just look at human chromosome #2.

>while this theory may or may not have supporting proof, it should not be taught as the only theories. there are plenty of other theories out there, such as intelligent design.
PFFFFFFFFFFT- HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Okay, is this guy serious? He has to be joking.

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 22 00:12:27 2011 No.2750470 It's not like I have much choice in the matter. The theory of evolution is just too convincing for me not to believe in it.

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 22 00:12:27 2011 No.2750471 >>2750445 I DIDNT COME FROM NO MONKEY

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 22 00:13:27 2011 No.2750480 >>2750417 Sounds like you graduated from the Kent Hovind & Michael Behe "School of Evolution". I suggest you actually learn about the Evolution rather than parrot those clowns.

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 22 00:13:27 2011 No.2750482 >>2750396 Prove gravity is real and not another type of matter of attraction

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 22 00:15:27 2011 No.2750494 >>2750480 I won't stand for you slandering the good names of Dr. Kent Hovind and Dr. Michael Behe. They are respected authorities in their fields, and just because you have a personal grudge against them doesn't mean they aren't experts.

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 22 00:16:27 2011 No.2750501 >>2750471 The evidence we've uncovered so far says that you, and the rest of us for that matter, came from a common ancestor of both humans and primates. Hate to break it to your bro.

>>	Scientist Tue Mar 22 00:17:27 2011 No.2750512 >>2750494 Behe is no expert. PZ Myers, now he's an expert. Come back to me when Behe bothers to research a field, like clotting pathways, before giving speeches on it.

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 22 00:19:27 2011 No.2750521 >>2750494 I don't need to slander anyone, their supposed "work" speaks for itself. They have no idea what they're even talking about.

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 22 00:21:27 2011 No.2750531 Okay let's see science guy, if we men came from monkeys, how come we still have monkeys? Check fucking mate!

>>	Scientist Tue Mar 22 00:22:27 2011 No.2750539 >>2750531 Go away troll, or for the truly ignorant, please bother to educate yourself on evolution before attempting to refute it. I suggest Dawkins' The Greatest Show On Earth as an excellent introduction book to evolution.

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 22 00:22:27 2011 No.2750540 >>2750531 If Americans came from the British, why are the British still there?

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 22 00:24:19 2011 No.2750546 >>2750531 If Americans came from the British, why are the British still around?

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 22 00:25:27 2011 No.2750555 actually, people didn't come from monkeys. monkeys are our evolutionary siblings. we both came from our parents, which is the common ancestor of people and monkeys.

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 22 00:25:27 2011 No.2750556 >>2750546 >Implying that is a valid analogy, and that we really came from today's monkeys instead of sharing a common ancestor

Anonymous Tue Mar 22 00:27:27 2011 No.2750569

>>2750501
that's alright man, my bro won't mind, we have these kind of arguments all the time.
However you evolution guys are way to defensive of something that is still just a theory. It's just as likely that some intelligent designer kept modifying previous designs so as to create a more interesting system.

>>	Atwill !kelPcGZQlE Tue Mar 22 00:27:27 2011 No.2750572 I once came in a monkey.

>>	Scientist Tue Mar 22 00:28:27 2011 No.2750580 >>2750569 Guys. Just report him. Maybe he'll get banned if we all do. It's an obvious troll repeating all of the obvious lines.

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 22 00:29:27 2011 No.2750585 >>2750572 you get aids bro? should get that shit tested....

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 22 00:32:27 2011 No.2750607 File: 63 KB, 470x600, trolling.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Why are there always about 3 threads on this topic active in /sci/. Needs to be an autoban function for typing evolution.

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 22 00:35:27 2011 No.2750635 >>2750607 because there's always butt hurt science fags that can't not comment

>>	Scientist Tue Mar 22 00:37:27 2011 No.2750652 >>2750635 No one ever stops trolling by refusing to comment. The troll just changes. The only solution is to hide troll threads, hide troll posters (impossible with anon posting), or ban the troll.

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 22 00:39:27 2011 No.2750663 The possibility of evolution creating a system as complex as the human eye based on random chance is like a tornado going through a junkyard and assembling a functional 747.

>>	Scientist Tue Mar 22 00:39:27 2011 No.2750666 >>2750663 Please stop trolling.

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 22 00:41:27 2011 No.2750681 I've learned to just cut people who say this

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 22 00:43:27 2011 No.2750692 File: 100 KB, 392x345, troll_judges.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] When you repeat the same old troll verbatim, it can hardly be called a troll anymore.

Anonymous Tue Mar 22 00:43:27 2011 No.2750694

1. The complex inner workings of a watch necessitate an intelligent designer.
2. As with a watch, the complexity of X (a particular organ or organism, the structure of the solar system, life, the entire universe) necessitates a designer.

Checkmate, evolutionists/athiests

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 22 00:47:27 2011 No.2750711 >>2750663 >>2750694 you guys are so shit at arguing anti-evolution. It's nothing BUT trolling when you make shit arguments like that. >>2750569 on the other hand, is valid

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 22 00:51:27 2011 No.2750734 File: 471 KB, 1440x900, Who_Watches_the_Watchmen.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>2750694 who designed the watch man?

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 22 00:55:27 2011 No.2750755 >>2750734 God has no designer. God has always been.

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 22 00:59:27 2011 No.2750786 >>2750755 "It looks therefore it must be" is a hypothesis. A badly constructed one at that. I don't really condone teaching a hypothesis.

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 22 00:59:27 2011 No.2750790 >>2750755 nah, i don't think that's something you can claim. atleast there's tangible proof that evolution may exist but you can't claim shit about god

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 22 01:03:27 2011 No.2750814 >>2750694 You're comparing apples to oranges there, sir.

>>	Anonymous Tue Mar 22 01:15:27 2011 No.2750889 >>2750755 Incorrect the watch maker was born of his mother and has not always been, like Ganesha born of Shiva. Your analogy is flawed.

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]