[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 44 KB, 500x667, Phi.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2675580 No.2675580 [Reply] [Original]

Hey /sci/. I'm writing a report about using fosforylase isolated from potato to synthetisize aymlase, and I meassured the results using spektrofotometry. Here is my meassured absorbance every fourth minute. Can you spot the odd ones out? : D

0: 0,001
4: -0,013
8: 0,002
12: 0,002
16: 0,003
20: 0,003
24: 0,003
28: 0,003
32: 0,005
36: 0,006
40: 0,005
44: 0,005
48: 0,004
52: 0,017
56: 0,006

I feel like such a fucking failure.

>> No.2675591

Phosphorylase* and spectrofotometry*.

Pardon my spelling, English isn't my first language and I'm a bit annoyed right now.

>> No.2675707

No words of comfort /sci/?

>> No.2675719

Doctor the results and change them to what you want them to be.

>> No.2675742
File: 22 KB, 352x400, do_not_want8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2675742

>>2675719

>> No.2675756

>>2675719
This is funny because I was just forced to complete a 3-hour online training on responsible research.

>> No.2675776

>>2675719
I lol'd, because I've done that so many times in the past when the work I was doing was completely inconsequential.

>> No.2675790

>>2675580
unless you'r doing an absorbtion spectra on the enzyme to ensure its purity, mesuring light penetration is a crappy way to mesure concentrations. tbh man, this looks like the kinda sht u could do at 12 years old, just edit results so they dont look stupid, but leave one in and identify ait as an anomoly and point out it is well outside the range of the others, sugest what you could have done to improve the experiment. and i realy fucking hope you repeated it at least 3 times to get an average or you have made a newb mistake.

>> No.2675841

>>2675790

It's not meassuring the enzyme concentration, it's meassuring the strach concentration in an iodine solution.

>> No.2676031

fosforylase? Do you mean phosphorylase?

>> No.2676064

Hmm, -0.013 shouldn't be right, and 0.017 sounds a bit off, too. Amirite? Anyway, it looks like you have enough data points to make a solid graph (assuming that's the next step). I've done this experiment b4 but mine turned out even worse :( still got (some) good data, tho! So don't get yourself down.

>> No.2676086

You got the data, now make sense of it.
Or do it all over again until you get the results you want like a faggot.