[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 31 KB, 526x300, 1296503362612.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2658484 No.2658484 [Reply] [Original]

Could nothing be the state of inexistence? Or is the concept merely limited by our language?

In laymanesque terms: There is something (everything). What if there wasn't? Could that be the case.

>> No.2658489

no, there are no means to destroy everything

>> No.2658490

then what currently is, wouldnt be

>> No.2658494

Even a 100 percent functionality, your brain can't comprehend nothing.

>> No.2658497

Is Spacetime something? Or just a concept?

>> No.2658512
File: 100 KB, 591x775, 1259980950724.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2658512

>>2658497
is your face something?, or just hideous

OOOOOOHHHHHHH

>> No.2658743

>>2658484
I'll call the nothingverse and ask the why there's nothing rather than something.
Oh wait, I can't. The nothingverse doesn't exist.
So no, nothing can't exist.

>> No.2658794

HOW CAN NOTHING EXIST WHEN THERE IS NOTHING TO EXIST IN NOTHING

CAN THERE EVEN BE NOTHING

MY BRAIN

>> No.2658815

Nothing can't exist, because if it did, it'd be something, contradicting its defenition.

Therefore it is obligatory for something to exist.

>> No.2658824

>>2658484
But why if I run and when, like it does exist. Just as in thinking also must be related to the agent and the relationship is the agent. Thus nothingness becomes negated by its own inexistence. There is no win because it is all win, and not. Resistance is not only futile but becomes futile by resisting the futility of resistance. twelve times you can enter the recursive interaction, but autoreflexivity saves the day. Limits or none.

>> No.2658827

toasting in an awesome bread

>> No.2658880
File: 133 KB, 1024x768, 1297127069529.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2658880

Hurrrr, nothing is everywhere, durrr something, hurrr hurrrr fuck something, make nothing durrr

>> No.2658899
File: 28 KB, 460x341, car.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2658899

The fact that we exist proves that we're made out of nothing.

>> No.2658932

>philosophy
>bad philosophy

>> No.2658938

>very bad philosophy
>more green text here

>> No.2660244

no

>> No.2660891

It's a concept wasted on our intelligence. We clearly have difficulty fathoming alternative realities.

>> No.2660923

I think it's limited by our intelligence. If we contemplate it we're stifled by paradoxes. Surely there is an answer though, no /b/?

>> No.2660938

>>2660923
>>2660891

oops, accidental samefag...

>> No.2661235

Nothing is not a thing. The surface grammar of language misleads you. There is no "state of inexistence."

It is not possible for nothing to exist. Consider: if nothing existed, then there would be 0 things. But then the number of things there were would be 0. But then there would be 0. So there would be one thing. But then there would be 1. And so on. It is a necessary truth that an infinite number of things exist, namely the numbers.