Technocratic Republic of /sci/

[Axel the Possum No.2655997]

What ever happened to the whole technocratic republic thing?

[Anonymous No.2656016]

inurdaes died

[Colonel Coffee Mug !phJ7yIcs.Q No.2656018]

Well, you know, Inurdaes is still trying his hand at planning.

I, for one, would rather obtain my engineering degree, contribute, and sit tight with a cuppa like a good Randian hero while history takes it's JUST AS MOTHERFUCKING PLANNED course.

[Anonymous No.2656021]

>implying statism is sustainable or even moral

[Anonymous No.2656036]

>>2655997
Inurdaes is a delusional basement dwelling cancer, he couldn't organise a root in a brothel

[Colonel Coffee Mug !phJ7yIcs.Q No.2656047]

>>2656036

> he couldn't organise a root in a brothel

lol whut

[Anonymous No.2656059]

>>2656021


>implying an efficient form of government that values progress over individuals, is immoral

[Anonymous No.2656060]

>>2655997
I like having a society based on science and technology, but the central planning sounds kind of dumb. I'm an anarcho-capitalist. Science needs to be free from petty morality, but people deserve to be able to make a profit and spend their money how they choose.

[Anonymous No.2656081]

>mfw everyone thinks thinks technocracy means libertarian nano-socialist utopia, when in actuality it's is more akin to fascism

[Anonymous No.2656087]

>mfw everyone thinks thinks technocracy means libertarian nano-socialist utopia, when in actuality it is more akin to fascism

[Anonymous No.2656101]

>>2656087
This.
Those threads were fucking stupid.