/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.2572926]

E=mc2

They say the speed of light is a constant ( in void ) .
Than using common arithmetic we can re-arrange the formula :

E/m=c2

Since They say c is a constant , the only way c will have the correct value in that formula is ONLY for a Certain E and a Certain m . If you change any of those two the value of c also changes . Hence the formula is wrong .

E = 12
M = 3
12/3 = 4 so the speed of light in this case is root of 4 which is 2 ( meters per second ) . ‘Somewhat’ different than the 300,000,000 m/sec from reality …

Not only this but Any ( physics ) formulas that involve Constants are also wrong for the same Obvious reasons . Right , Pi is also a constant …

[Anonymous No.2572933]

This is making my eyes bleed. /sci/, please tell this individual to step off with science.

[Anonymous No.2572934]

>not sure if troll

For different values of E you would have a different corresponding value of m. Just like how, as your speed increases the time it takes to travel a constant distance decreases.

Congratulations OP you've invented ratios!

[Anonymous No.2572939]

1/2=2/4=4/8=8/16, do you follow the pattern..?

[Anonymous No.2572945]

>>2572926

If E=12 and M=3 produces an answer that is not the accepted value of C then obviously E cannot be 12 while M is 3.

[Anonymous No.2572953]

lol this guy is right make him the president of world now

[Anonymous No.2572959]

OP, find me a circle where the value of pi is not 3.14... please.

[Anonymous No.2572971]

>>2572959
The formula is C = D*pi.
Therefore it can be rearranged to C/D = pi.

C = 10
D = 2
10/2 = 5, again 'somewhat' different than the supposed 'constant' value of 3.14...

[OP No.2572974]

As a follow up:

Using my Unifying Properties it is also easy to prove that :

Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle is wrong :

" ... Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle is one of the fundamental concepts of Quantum Physics, and is the basis for the initial realization of fundamental uncertainties in the ability of an experimenter to measure more than one quantum variable at a time. Attempting to measure an elementary particle’s position to the highest degree of accuracy, for example, leads to an increasing uncertainty in being able to measure the particle’s momentum to an equally high degree of accuracy. Heisenberg’s Principle is typically written mathematically in either of two forms:

DE Dt ³ h / 4 p Dx Dp ³ h / 4 p ... " .

Of course , now that you are familiar with the Unifying Properties , you understand that the micro-vortices are what they thought at that time as Quanta . But at that time the SuperFluid wasn't on the table yet so no wonder they got it wrong .

That the Foundation of the Theory of Relativity are both wrong :

1.The laws of physics are the same for all observers in uniform motion relative to one another (principle of relativity),

But the Unifying Properties are not affected by motion or speed , the `laws` or better put `properties` are the same regardless of Relative motion of observers .

2.The speed of light in a vacuum is the same for all observers, regardless of their relative motion or of the motion of the source of the light ( another principle of relativity ).

But artificially orienting the micro-vortices spin intake with the direction of movement an object can travel at the linear speed of light . To that object another micro-vortice ( photon ) of `light` traveling besides it would appear stationary , not traveling at the speed of light relative to the object . That`s another clash with the theory of relativity .

[Anonymous No.2572985]

OP can't algebra lawl

[Anonymous No.2572995]

>>2572926
>doesn't know how to apply a formula properly

[OP No.2572998]

>>2572971
This formula, this equation, demonstrates the relationship between Energy and Matter as it would behave at the speed of light, which is universally denoted as being "C".

Therefore, the parameters established for this equation is that C is a constant, being the speed of light. ... "

Right Q , the Rules of Math were made different for this " Special " equation ...
Of course it doesn't cut it in the world of science which should have Uniform rules not different from equarion to equation or if your name is Einstein .

Further more the E=mc2 it is Forced since science proved that c it is Not a constant . This Fact it is Not reflected in the equation HENCE the equation E = mc2 is ... FALSE !

[Anonymous No.2573004]

>>2572998
>>2572926
You are the fucking dumbest person I have ever seen on 4chan.

How are are you?

[Anonymous No.2573013]

>>2572998
>>2572926

[Anonymous No.2573014]

>>2572971
Draw a circle with diameter 2 and circumferance 10, then you can start changing the value of pi

[OP No.2573019]

>>2573004
>how are are you
>YOU are the fucking dumbest person I have ever seen on 4chan.

[sage No.2573021]

>>2572926
>>2572926

[Anonymous No.2573023]

This is how you make a circle with D=2 and C=10
>>2573014

You are clearly retar- Special

[Anonymous No.2573032]

>>2573023
no, thats not what I asked for

I asked for a circle with diameter 2 and circumference 10.

[sage No.2573035]

>>2573019
>>2572926
You are the fucking dumbest person I have ever seen on 4chan.

How old are you?

[OP No.2573040]

I gotta level with you guys, im not even coming up with this shit, I'm getting it all here:

http://www.godlikeproductions(dot)com/forum1/message1366643/pg2

[Anonymous No.2573049]

C'mon people! OP is an obvious TROLL. Nobody, who is able to use a computer is that stupid!

[SAGE No.2573046]

>>2572926
>>2572926
OMFG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
monkeys have learned to type!

[SAGE No.2573053]

>>2572926
>>2573040

[Anonymous No.2573062]

the problem with relativity is that energy must transmute which isn't true

[Anonymous No.2573065]

>>2572998
> the relationship between Energy and Matter as it would behave at the speed of light

nope, it's as it behaves at rest. m is "rest mass"

[Anonymous No.2573072]

pi is only constant in one state of geometry. however that state is translatable to describe other states of curvature

[Anonymous No.2573087]

If an object is travelling at 1/3 the speed of light away from a light source, starting 1 light year away from the light source, how long will it take the light to reach the object from the object's frame of reference?

[Anonymous No.2573095]

MC2=E

[Anonymous No.2573098]

>>2573013
>>2573013
>>2573013
>>2573013
>>2573013
>>2573013
>>2573013
>>2573013
>>2573013
>>2573013
>>2573013
>>2573013
>>2573013
>>2573013
Which episode is this from again?

[Anonymous No.2573111]

>>2572926
FUCKING STUPID BRO!

thanks for the laugh

[Anonymous No.2573123]

-2/10
you can be told off by a twelve year old and
simple unit check

(J)/(m)
joules per kg does not equal meters per second per second......

second its not 2*c its c^2 a twelve year old can tell you that

dear fucktards

stay off /sci/

[sage No.2573130]

>>2572926
O WOW

[Anonymous No.2573150]

>>2573023
which episode motherfuckas

[Anonymous No.2573179]

­­­
­­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­
­

[Anonymous No.2573196]

>>2573150
The one where sewer mutants gangrape OP's mom. The whore gets pregnant, is constantly on heroine, and is forcebly assfucked and beaten.

Nine months later you get OP!

I think the episode is called, "OP is a fucking joke".

[Anonymous No.2573206]

>>2572926
The equation does not require c to be a constant, it just states that E=mc² which can be derived with simple math.

In a different universe where c might be twice as large it will most likely still be E=mc² unless there is a different math in this other universe.

[Anonymous No.2573209]

>>2573123
c is in m/s
c^2 so = m^2/s^2
Joules is NewtonsxMeter = N.m
Newton is Kg.m\s^2
So Joules is Kg.m^2\s^2
Energy\Mass is J\Kg but J is Kg.m^2\s^2
So Energy\Mass is m^2\s^2

[Anonymous No.2573236]

>>2572926
YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
KEEP FEEDING THE TROLL /SCI/!!!!!!!!!!!
DO IT FAGGOTS!