[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 2 KB, 251x120, solve.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2479118 No.2479118 [Reply] [Original]

Show me you're smarter than /b/, /sci/

>> No.2479120

Doesn't matter, because how did the moon get there? You can't explain it can you? You think you're so smart, but where did the moon come from?

>> No.2479124

solve what?

>> No.2479126

>>2479120

out of your mothers vag.

>> No.2479130

36 + X^2 + 12X

>> No.2479132

>>2479118
6^2+2*6*x+x^2
=36+12*x+x^2
=36+x*(12+x)

>> No.2479140

36 + x²

>> No.2479144
File: 55 KB, 469x428, 1295711938065.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2479144

>>2479140

>> No.2479145

12 + 2x

>> No.2479151

>>2479140
If I could change anything I wanted in mathematics, I'd make it so that every function is linear.

>> No.2479155

y

>> No.2479156

(6 + x)^2 = 36 + 6x + x^2

>> No.2479162

>>2479156
U meen 12x

>> No.2479166

>>2479118
how is one supposed to solve an incomplete equation?...

>> No.2479169

36 (for X =0)

>> No.2479175

12+12x+x²

My guess, almost certainly wrong because I'm retarded.

>> No.2479177

Wolfram it very easy Q regardless

x^2 + 12x + 36

>> No.2479180

>>2479166
do the only thing one can do, distribute the exponent

>>2479140
this guy has it down

>> No.2479198

Also mind me if im being stupid but im not following how you guys are getting 12x out of this.

>> No.2479205

>>2479198
2*6x

>> No.2479212

>>2479198
(6+x)(6+x)
6*6 + 6*x + 6*x + x*x
36 + 6x + 6x + x^2
36 + 12x + x^2

>> No.2479217
File: 229 KB, 640x597, MoonIce.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2479217

(6+x)^2
= 36 + 12x + x^2
= \mathcal{L} = i \bar\psi \gamma^\mu \partial_\mu \psi - e\bar{\psi}\gamma_\mu (A^\mu+B^\mu) \psi -m \bar{\psi} \psi - \frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}

>> No.2479236

>>2479205
wouldnt you distribute it first? normally you do parentheses then exponent and so on but in this situation wouldnt you be distrubuting it first?

>> No.2479239

You can expand and you get
(6+X)(6+X)
x^2+12X+36

Or if you want to find X
(6+X)(6+X)=0
6+X=0
X=-6


Well that was easy

>> No.2479244
File: 34 KB, 400x400, Picard facepalm.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2479244

I've never been to /sci/ before I just stopped by to browse is this seriously what you guys do here?

>> No.2479287

(6+x)(6+x)
etc

Argument invalid

Captcha: for fuego

>> No.2479289

>>2479244
Not often. And I agree that this is dumb, and probably lots of samefag.

>> No.2479336

<span class="math">
(6+x)^2 = 6^2 + 12x + x^2 = 36+12x+x^2
[/spoiler]
Here, we've got JsMath.

>> No.2479657

>>2479166
>>2479118
>>2479124
You can solve for the solution of the function (zeros), there is only one since its already factored, when y= then x=-6
Or you can expand it like everyone else did x^2 + 12x + 36

Also remember that you can't distribute an exponent like a coefficient (6+x)^2 is (6+x)(6+x) not 6^2 + x^2

>> No.2479666

42

>> No.2479677

>>2479239
>if you want to find X

X is a fucking variable you fucking fuck. You can't solve for X because it's not an equation.

>> No.2479687

>>2479118
Solve for what? Solve for x? Okay, give me an equation and I'll solve it.

>> No.2479700

<span class="math">
\textstyle
\quad x^3 + 12x^2 + 36x \quad
[/spoiler] / 2