/sci/ - Science & Math

[Anonymous No.2431427]

Could you extract any “meaning” from a Fourier-like transform of the sound wave the brain auditory system receives, even if you know a bit more of Fourier transform and of the anatomy of the inner ear than Kanzi does? One can not even recognize 2-dimensional images by looking at graphical representations of the illumination levels, which is a much easier problem. What a baby chimpanzee’s brain does is more “abstract” and difficult, than the solution of the hardest problem ever resolved by mathematicians.

[Anonymous No.2431431]

>>2431427
> sound wave the brain auditory system receives
Nope, already lost. It's not a "sound wave" once it is changed into nerve impulses.

But yeah, fourier transforms work great on sound. Manipuling the fourier transform of sound is how autotune works.

[Anonymous No.2431433]

I'd take the anti-transform and listen to it.

[RoboMendel !!BJTz0OTwQdf No.2431434]

What the fuck am I reading?

[Anonymous No.2431436]

When you put a "word" inside "quotation marks" while using its standard "definition" it makes you look like you don't understand the "words" that you're "using."

[i- !LoVeEKpnh2 No.2431450]

damning where's that pic with the girl licking the prog snake

[Anonymous No.2431967]

sage