[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 92 KB, 947x645, sadfrog.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2426927 No.2426927 [Reply] [Original]

;_;

>> No.2426932

If anyone deserved to live forever...

Alas, that he was aboard the last train to the dragon's lair.

>> No.2426947

>implying carl sagan was even a proper scientist

>> No.2426955

>>2426947

>Implying Astrophysics is not a proper science
Nope.

>> No.2426959

>>2426947

This. There's a fine line between scientist and spokesman. Same applies to Richard Dawkins.

>> No.2426968

>>2426959
>>2426947
you stupid fuckers, just because they didn't have aspergers and could actually talk in front of more than 2 people doesn't mean they were not scientists. They've published loads of scientific material

>> No.2426970

What's the deal with /sci/ and Sagan? He's dead. Find a new role model. Like this guy: http://www.timecube.com/

>> No.2426971

I came to this revelation while watching ep 11 of cosmos on shrooms (my favorite sober and non-sober show) and started sobbing for him

then i went outside and looked at the stars and felt better

>> No.2426976

Feynman.
Sagan.
Asimov.

I would kill millions to bring these three back.

>> No.2426980

>>2426968
>published books about other people's research

Cool story bro

>> No.2426988

>>2426980

>Cool story bro

/b/ is that way, 'bro'
<---

>> No.2426992

>>2426970
what the fuck?
you retard, sagan is still alive,

>> No.2426993

>>2426988
bro is bro, bro

>> No.2427000

>>2426988
>implying 'cool story bro' is only relevant on /b/
?fullretard.jpg

>> No.2427003

>>2427000

>Implying it isn't

>> No.2427006

>>2426992
in our hearts, he is ;_;

>> No.2427013
File: 34 KB, 500x389, 1280917865894.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2427013

>>2426992
>>2426992
>>2426992
>>2426992

>> No.2427021

>atheists will never accept carl sagan's consciousness is still alive

;_;

>> No.2427052

>>2426968
This. It's sad that people who have contributed at most 2 papers are bumping their unwarranted scinetifi self importance with jelly.

>> No.2427057
File: 17 KB, 310x301, jesus-christ-thumbs-up.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2427057

>>2427021
Kind of shot yourself in the foot there, eh?

>> No.2427068

>>2426927
Carl Sagan is trolling, he is flying in the space

>> No.2427072
File: 16 KB, 500x500, 1290633608158.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2427072

buzzkill b'awwwwwww

>> No.2427178

>>2426992
this guy is write
carl sagan is still alive, i saw a live documentary by him just a couple of months ago.

>> No.2427238
File: 151 KB, 622x735, 1285498538833.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2427238

New age assholes misusing Sagan for their pseudoscientific agenda boils my fucking blood.

>> No.2427244

I would kill billions and billions to bring back Sagan… And Feynman… :(

>> No.2427251
File: 7 KB, 231x252, 1296109437552s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2427251

>>2427178
Intellectual humor..i love it.

>> No.2427425

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oY59wZdCDo0

;_;

>> No.2427462
File: 85 KB, 500x725, tears woodcut.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2427462

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

>You will never explore the galaxy, discovering new forms of life
>You will die and be forgotten, every argument cold, every word as though it was never spoken
>All Sagan was doing is pointing out the obvious to a species too nearsighted to see it
>A species that will, in time, forget him as well and all he said

>And yet, as a group of peoples linked together by our lives and our deaths
>We march onwards

>It will not be we who reach the stars

>> No.2427472

>>2427251
how is that humur?
he is alive, you retards

>> No.2427779
File: 115 KB, 590x801, carlsaganexistence.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2427779

guys, guys...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Cd36WJ79z4&feature=related

0:27-0:36 is the relevant part.

Carl Sagan was speaking to us.

>> No.2427887

The wavelengths of Sagans existence are on his way through cosmos.

>> No.2427929

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4nP5Gbm2XKc&feature=related

think about that while listening to this.

>> No.2427934

>>2427779

whats a mote?

>> No.2427992
File: 239 KB, 588x469, 1289762029251.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2427992

>>2427934

>> No.2428001

>>2427934
Normally like a tiny dust grain, or the like. Emphasis on "tiny".

>> No.2428013

>>2427887
funny how atheist scientists get all religious like when they are close to death.

>> No.2428050

>>2427462
the chinamen will

>> No.2428053

>>2428013

>implying carl sagan said that
>implying carl sagan hasn't been dead for a while
>implying you aren't a blundering idiot

>> No.2428074

>>2428050

>i am half chinese

>dont be an ass

>> No.2428080

>>2428013

Funny how EVERYONE gets like that when near death, not just scientists

>> No.2428119

>>2428080
ya but its hypocritical when atheist scifags do it.

>> No.2428136

>>2428119
Hypocritical when everyone does it, what's your point?

>> No.2428152

>>2428119

Next time you get held up at gunpoint by a mugger, ask yourself: "Is now the appropriate time to worry about whether or not my religious beliefs contradict with what I'm about to think of in the following 5 minutes?"

>> No.2428193

>>2428152

I make it a point of hanging out in shady neighborhoods with pockets full of cash just to test my irreligious fervor

>> No.2428311

>>2426927

>implying Carl Sagan isn't doing this right now

>> No.2428323

>>2428152
Maybe you should move out to some normal place.

>> No.2428325

>>2428080

[citation needed]

I do hope human beings aren't that cowardly.

>> No.2428449

>>2426959
stating that there is a fine line in your opinion is a useless assertion.
Where is that fine line?

As far as I know, one is considered a scientist when one has acquired a phd and authored articles which were published in respectable peer reviewed journals.
The following articles neatly sum up the educational credentials and scientific contributions of both of the aforementioned individuals.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Sagan

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_dawkins
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_publications_by_Richard_Dawkins#Academic_papers

Next time you wish to discount the contributions of men greater than yourself, please at least provide some basis for your accusations.