[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 119 KB, 1618x913, Trollsciencechristfags.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2418114 No.2418114 [Reply] [Original]

Would it be useful to make an imaginary number (lets call it £ for now) such that <span class="math"> \frac [1}{0} [/spoiler] = £? It has other parameters like (0)(£) = 1? Obviously it's an imaginary number, and it wouldnt use the symbol of the pound, but i think it might be useful in certain functions and limits. Or is there already such a number?

>> No.2418132

shit, meant to be 1 divided by zero = this imaginary number.

>> No.2418150

>>2418132
you mean <span class="math">\infty[\math]? good idea.[/spoiler]

>> No.2418152

>>2418132
Nope.
With it you could prove that one number would equal every other number.
It's how all those 1=2 proofs work- they divide by zero to do it.

>> No.2418154

>>2418132
you mean
<div class="math">
\infty
[\eqn]? good idea.</div>

>> No.2418169

There are plenty of systems where division by zero is defined.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheel_theory
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_projective_line

>> No.2418172

>>2418152
It would only have a few uses. I'm sure most people arent concerned about a troll proving 1=2

>> No.2418189

In the beginning instance of mankind’s birth and creation, genesis, the key and definitive elements to all of existence were forged and set in motion; the Trinitarian Formula, the Father, Holy Spirit, and Son. Each fraction of the group was assigned with different responsibilities, which in an ideal situation would work harmoniously with one another.

The Father is referring to the Psychological Domain of existence; he is the architect to all of the life that had existed and is to exist in the future. He is the executive element of Wisdom, which constitutes towards the Trinity, and is commonly associated with Creation.

The Holy Spirit is referring to the Physical Domain of existence; she is responsible for the capital composure of those beings that are created. She follows orders from the Father, constructing what he had designed and then mothering it. She is the component of Courage, that corresponds to a third of the Trinity, and is commonly associated with Sanctification.

The Son is referring to the Spiritual Domain of existence; it is the developing mechanism required for The Father and The Holy Spirit to continue. It provides the organism for reproduction, enabling the parent domains to advance and broaden. It is the fundamental constituent of Power, and it is commonly associated with Redemption.

Together the three conclusive aspects of Wisdom, Courage and Power embody the higher organism that is Man, who to exist requires each section of the complete Trinity intact and in working form. The divine plan destined to construct and shape the vast universe and every living being that lies within it, was complete, and ready to create, redeem and sanctify for eternity.

>> No.2418196

When Man was finally erected, so too was his external mother and father; the couple obligated to parent him through the wide and expansive universe, Time and Nature. The dimensions which hold and protect Man, and the symphony that guides him like a swift wind. They exist as the extrinsic dwelling of all mankind, linked through the brother of Man and their Son, the soul.

Nature is not kind, she treats all beings impartially – alike a bellows, empty yet never ceasing its supply. She is complete, because she does not serve herself, but rather the life that exists within her ever adjusting womb. Only the strongest and wisest beings are chosen to continue, this is the flow of nature, an eternal decay and renewal; all the flourishing things will return their source, and whoever accepts this natural ebb and flow is gifted with enlightenment.

Time is a box-like essence that plays the role of an overseer, and sets the proportions for beings to experience, what goes around comes around, and what goes up must come down. Many subtle measures and depths exist within the confines of time, only the astute can determine the specifics that are hidden within its broad expanse. Although the obvious limits of time are noticeable, inside its boundaries is a field of flawless liberty.

The Son of the pair is an ever changing crystal abyss of infinite and tranquil silence, which gives to its parents the necessary substance for them to entwine with one another. Commonly the forms and shapes of the components that are provided by the soul are similar to the clearest and most affluent waters and liquids. It reflects the beings that exist alongside it – and consents visualization through its adaptable and luminous embodiment.

>> No.2418201
File: 12 KB, 271x380, 1296057989755.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2418201

Together the external entirety of Time, Nature and the Son materialize the higher organism that is God, which exists as the fourth dimension, responsible for the sophistication, management, and the evolution of Man. The three are completely reliant on the others presence, meaning that if one of them was to disjunction, the other two would most definitely rupture and vanish.

>heaven is mixed in with empirical actuality, problem OP?

>> No.2418207

>>2418169
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_projective_line
Right, this is just signless infinity. Except saying
<span class="math">\infty \cdot 0 = 1[/spoiler] doesn't work, as you can multiply both sides by 2, to also get <span class="math">\infty \cdot 0 = 2[/spoiler].

>> No.2418218

>>2418189
>>2418196
Fuck off aether

>> No.2418240
File: 24 KB, 605x571, tables.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2418240

>>2418207

>> No.2418528

It probably wouldn't be very useful, no, but the same can be said of all sorts of mathematical objects. You should explore it and see what sort of changes you'd have to make to conventional math to accommodate your desired revision.

Heck, about a week ago, someone posted saying that we ought to say that 0/0=1, and then defended it fairly well. I couldn't stay for the end of the thread, being as that I had to go to work, but that rule works pretty well until you start dealing with polynomials. Regardless, it's an interesting concept to explore.

>> No.2419156

>>2418201

What's happening in this picture?
Uncropped please?