/sci/ - Science & Math

File: 20 KB, 300x333, 300px-Julian_Assange_26C3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Tue Jan 18 19:53:39 2011 No.2372243 [Reply] [Original]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zuQFYiJ5Mf8

Any Psychologyfags wanna do some complex facial analysis on this video.

I like how he laughs about it.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 18 20:02:39 2011 No.2372281 derp

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 18 20:58:39 2011 No.2372532 herp derp

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 18 21:03:39 2011 No.2372553 blar dar bar

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 18 21:03:39 2011 No.2372555 Pretty sure you watch too much tv, OP.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 18 21:08:39 2011 No.2372577 Well, he isn't behind anything. Although, he is putting on an act that he cared. He is more concerned about the economy that has been effected by the event.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 18 21:13:39 2011 No.2372601 Reading youtube comments makes me sad. It's hard to believe there are people stupider than 4channers. How people can still believe the collapse of the towers was a demolition is beyond me. It's like creationism. Willful ignorance of science.

Anonymous Tue Jan 18 21:19:39 2011 No.2372623

>>2372243
You're a major dumbass if you think the towers were intentionally demolished.

http://www.debunking911.com/index.html

Oh, wait, I'm sorry, Rockefeller must be behind that website as well. You had better go put on your tin foil hat, OP, I'm sure the Feds don't want you to know too much. Ass.

Anonymous Tue Jan 18 23:08:39 2011 No.2373191

>>2372243

well it's hard to read old people's facial reactions because of the saggy as shit skin and loss of muscle definition...

but the way he did his speech stuck out to me.

He started that 'woe is me' thing after he stopped talking...

It would have seem more genuine if he had emotions WHILE he spoke... but this is still in no way conclusive...

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 18 23:08:39 2011 No.2373192 lawl

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 18 23:12:39 2011 No.2373203 >>2372623 >>2372601 you act as if it is scientific truth that the building wasn't demolished... you likely have as much evidence supporting your belief as christfags do god

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 18 23:18:39 2011 No.2373222 >>2373203 As much as I agree that the towers were demolished (see World Trade Center building 7, which just kind of collapsed. Just because,) the burden of proof lies on those who say it was demolished.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 18 23:21:39 2011 No.2373229 http://www2.ae911truth.org/downloads/29_Structural-Civil_Engineers_2009-06-17.pdf?format=pdf But what would they know, gay engineers.

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 18 23:23:39 2011 No.2373237 File: 22 KB, 402x500, sky745.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 18 23:28:39 2011 No.2373251 >>2373222 and why is that? Should not the standard stance be a plea of ignorance until proven either way?

>>	Anonymous Tue Jan 18 23:44:39 2011 No.2373325 >>2373229 So now we have evidence to the contrary of a terrorist attack, anybody have opposing evidence? If not it would then seem reasonable to say it was staged.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 19 00:23:39 2011 No.2373558 >>2373325 Except if you actually read more than the website and major headlines, you would figure it that it's all false. l2scieance

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 19 00:25:39 2011 No.2373571 >>2373325 how about two planes hitting the towers?

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 19 01:38:39 2011 No.2373943 >>2373325 >contrary to terrorist attack >sand people hijack planes and crash into trade towers please explain

Anonymous Wed Jan 19 02:46:39 2011 No.2374216

>>2373943

first of all besides mugshots of random middle easterners how do you know there even were such people aboard.

Secondly, The evidence shows that it was not the plane that caused the collapse, so that would be contrary to the belief that the afghan terrorists were behind it.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 19 02:48:39 2011 No.2374226 >>2372601 building 7

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 19 02:50:39 2011 No.2374234 >>2372601 implying the guys saying "we are sending different fictional versions of the same story to different households around the country" are scientists who's word is final, and a sturdy foundation to form you worldview upon?

Anonymous Wed Jan 19 02:59:39 2011 No.2374270

Holy fucking shit, it seems the /new/ cancer is invading /sci/ since it's shithole has been wiped from the face of the earth.

For the record, no amount of logic and science will change these retards minds. Any scrap, any slightest shred of evidence will override their sensibilities since they rather believe it than the truth.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 19 03:05:39 2011 No.2374298 >>2374270 I'm not sure which side you are advocating against...

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 19 03:08:39 2011 No.2374310 what's a decent video i can watch debunking the conspiracy? I watched the one on OP's url intended for those just new to the site, and it has the rationale of a 2 year old.

>>	Anonymous Wed Jan 19 03:11:39 2011 No.2374324 File: 150 KB, 462x495, 1280716710577.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>2374310 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyyRXfROhrc enjoy

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]