[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 30 KB, 160x160, haw.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2314444 No.2314444 [Reply] [Original]

gravity is not an interaction.

>> No.2314500
File: 34 KB, 1323x725, PUDIPUIDI.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2314500

>mass is energy
>every particle has an energy potential, a charge, etc.
>energy attracts energy.
>on a wider, macroscopic and astronomic scale, it delivers gravitation.

find any flaw in this.

>> No.2314503

>>2314500
>energy attracts energy
what

>> No.2314509
File: 44 KB, 446x400, 1268866432181.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2314509

>>2314500
>energy attracts energy.

In general no

\thread

>> No.2314513

>>2314500
>mass is energy
in certain contexts ye--
>every particle has an energy potential, a charge, etc.
sure, but what does that have to do wi--
>energy attracts energy
Whoa boy, simmer down now.
>on a wider, macroscopic and astronomic scale, it delivers gravitation.
Yeah, fuck you.

>> No.2314522

Nice try, friend. Photons, for example, do indeed possess energy, but no mass, and therefore do not interact gravitationally. Also, gravity is a virtual exchange of gravitons.

>> No.2314531
File: 13 KB, 261x350, 70870871094645.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2314531

>>2314500
>every particle has an energy potential

That is also not generally the case

How old are you? 12? 14?

\thread thread

>> No.2314560
File: 20 KB, 940x540, catcatcatcat.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2314560

>>2314522
yeah, virtual exchange of gravitons.\


>>2314531
hey it's my first theory ever.

i was like, if quads: i develop it.

i'm not pro at all. also yes it is flawed because fucking photons.


see you at post >>2315555 maybe i'll have something more credible.

>> No.2314582
File: 25 KB, 478x468, 1266999398093.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2314582

>>2314560
You actually made a hypothesis, not a theory. Good Luck.

>> No.2314622

>>2314444
>>2314500

And how does it follow that graviation is not an interaction?

I assume that was what you set out to prove?

>> No.2314668
File: 40 KB, 761x552, 1285402330408.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2314668

- Using a Protron Synchrotron combined with a tokamak for nuclear fusion

- Using HIV virus to counter Blood Cancer

- Gravity no more an interaction

Patachu. Applied trollscience.

>> No.2314699

>>2314622

If I get it: each particle has a mass, therefore is potentially a graviton.

Cool! let's forget photons because photons are massless particles, and virtual.

Then what remains? Electro-gravitational waves? I think too much, trying to reply to a troll thread.