[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 38 KB, 264x354, Technocracy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2260896 No.2260896 [Reply] [Original]

Has anybody here watched Adam Curtis' Pandora's Box?
I didn't know much about the USSR before, and never realized that it was in fact a technocracy... It reminded me of all those threads about the Technocratic Republic of /sci/.

So tell me, /sci/borgs, in what way would the TR/S/ differ from the USSR to assure it's success?

>> No.2260902

>"What is this, sounds like some retarded science-fiction system of government where we're all supposed to let robots do all the work or some bullshit like that"
>Technocracy is a form of government in which engineers, scientists, health professionals and other technical experts are in control of decision making in their respective fields.

WHY THE FUCK ISN'T EVERY GOVERNMENT LIKE THIS?!

>> No.2260917

The USSR was not an actual technocracy, although it was (to some extent) internally
presented as such to make it more palatable for
the working masses. The actual governance was
not based on the views of the experts as the country
was ran by the inner circle of the communist
party according to their preferences.

Learn your history from multiple sources, not
just one documentary.

>> No.2260918

Bullshit, USSR was more like gerontoredneckcracy.

>> No.2260927

>>2260917

Forgot to add that whether or not the country is
governed according to the views of the experts
does not mean choosing one economical model
over another. Optimally a technocratic state would
change how much it participated in controlling
certain aspects of economy according to changing
variables.