Evidence for Reincarnation

[Anonymous No.2246871]

Billions of people and hundreds of cultures have sworn on the existence of reincarnation. Now supportive research has been done on the subject by PhDs from many fields, with the most famous being Ian Stevenson.

Find his book /sci/ it is rigorously and meticulously document. It will challenge your belief about the world.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ian_Stevenson

And yes, there is evidence.

[Anonymous No.2246891]

where is your god now?

[Anonymous No.2246888]

evidence such as?

[Naggarothian !!0S4L3hs2lkr No.2246895]

>old news
Yeah.....I don't think so.

sage in a troll thread

[Anonymous No.2246898]

>>2246888
Compelling evidence. If only you'd put in the effort to get the book.

"Twenty Cases Suggestive of Reincarnation"

It might be in your library; if not, tell them to order it.

[Anonymous No.2246914]

>>2246898

>Translation: There is no empirical evidence

[sage No.2246918]

>>2246871
Look to sources, none are credible journals.

Example:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journal_of_Scientific_Exploration

LMAO.

Nice try troll, when he publishes in "science", then I'll take a look.

[SAGE No.2246923]

>>2246871
Saged and reported

[Anonymous No.2246932]

And /sci/ proves itself to be nothing more than willful ignorance.

Once again. You won't believe anything until Richard Dawkins says it's true, will you?

[Anonymous No.2246961]

>>2246932
I don't know who Richard Dawkins is, fuckface.

[sage No.2246962]

>>2246932
>Richard Dawkins

Who the fuck is Richard Dawkins?
You really should step up your game troll.

[Anonymous No.2246969]

>>2246932

>BAWWW THEY WON'T EAT WHAT I SHIT IN THEIR PLATE UNTIL I SHOW REAL PROOF

We are not the dark ages anymore.

Either put up or shut up with that supernatural BS

But you can't so all you do is accuse anyone who calls you out "not being open minded"

[Anonymous No.2246989]

>>2246969
The problem here is that /sci/ has adamantly reached their own conclusion without reviewing the actual evidence. I told them what book to get, yet that is apparently not enough for an intelligent discussion here.

[Tautoulogic No.2246993]

>>2246932

Stephen Dawkins

[Anonymous No.2246995]

>>2246989
No, apparently peer review is needed

[Tautoulogic No.2246998]

>>2246932

>Stephen Dawkins

[Anonymous No.2247012]

>>2246989
>evidence
>one book with anecdotal evidence

Yeah, no.

This is what I need to believe in reincarnation:

1. Proof of a soul
2. Proof that souls are recycled after death

[Anonymous No.2247021]

YOU want to prove reincarnation, YOU have to present evidence. Yes, YOU - We wont go looking for it for you. Provide links to strudies/articles from credable sources, and im sure everyone here will read them, but we are not going to hunt down some random book for some retard on the internet.

If you can give is proper credible sources, do so, and we will read them. If not, Get the fuck out of my /sci/

[Anonymous No.2247040]

>>2247012
>>2247021
Read your heart out

http://books.google.com/books?id=vIDES6VWl1MC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Twenty+Cases+suggestive
+of+reincarnation&source=bl&ots=kz6a_YAoly&sig=VzCXt7xJBeAEihde1llr08nVXO4&hl=en&amp
;ei=BdkTTd7pFobGlQePw7X0Cw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CDsQ6AEwA
w#v=onepage&q&f=false

[Anonymous No.2247045]

>>2247021

This is absolutely true

I always read journal articles whenever people post them before I post in a thread

I won't even bother to do anything other than sage if someone tries to pass off wikipedia pages, youtube videos, or personal blogs/sites as sources

[Anonymous No.2247051]

>>2247040
The book says it's true so it must be true

[Anonymous No.2247059]

>>2247040
>>2247040

You do realise thats a 'review' right?

I'll read whats there, anyway. Do you have any articles from a credable journal? or is this it? Becuase the only reason i'd be intrested in this book is to find where his sources came from and read them directly.

Do you have a copy of the book? If so, find the sources and see what ones you can find online.

[Tautoulogic No.2247057]

>>2247040

hey aether you forgot your tag man.

[Anonymous No.2247065]

>>2247059
i mean 'preview'

fuck i just woke up.

[Anonymous No.2247070]

>>2247040
Read some of the book. It's laughable.

They guy basically tells stories that are unusual, but nothing suggesting supernatural events. For example, a kid recognizes someone to whom he supposedly owed a debt to in a past life, but was unsure of the amount.

This is easily explainable as the debtor trying to scam someone, and then arguing over how much money to pay.

it's all bullshit. Give me a research article, not a book. Especially not a preview to a book that I have to buy.

[Anonymous No.2247084]

Have you read the book OP? If yes, how does author prove reincarnation?

Inb4 "go read yourself" bullshit

[Anonymous No.2247088]

okay.

[Carl Sagan No.2247091]

Psst, remember what i told you about picking the right books.

[Anonymous No.2247094]

I don't give two shits about this but for those who are looking to find his books, here is one:

European Cases of the Reincarnation Type
http://ifile.it/1dqfzb9/lgPIbxaSt.7z
password = ebooksclub.org

As if the the wiki didn't reflect enough on this guy's silliness

[Anonymous No.2247093]

>>2247091

[Anonymous No.2247092]

You guise are a bunch of assholes.

"Tucker said that toward the end of his life, Stevenson felt his long-stated goal of getting science to consider reincarnation as a possibility was not going to be realized in this lifetime.[4] According to his University of Virginia obituary, his greatest frustration was not that people dismissed his theories, but that in his opinion most did so without even reading the evidence he had assembled.[3][10] Stevenson died of pneumonia at the Blue Ridge Retirement community in Charlottesville, Virginia, on February 8, 2007"

[Naggarothian !!0S4L3hs2lkr No.2247101]

>>2247092
lol, OP is butthurt we didn't eat the shit he put on our plates.

[Anonymous No.2247102]

Guys

guys
guys
guys

In my last life i was a ww2 soldier who died in the battle of Stalingrad (i was commie)

If this is accurate then obviously true.


I was also i pirate.

iff pirates existed, i was obviously one of them.


SCIENCE.

[Anonymous No.2247106]

>>2247101

Not OP, faggot.

[Naggarothian !!0S4L3hs2lkr No.2247112]

>>2247106
Who cares? You're still taking OP's side, and you're still butthurt.

[Anonymous No.2247116]

Here's the explanation for this "evidence."

Kid: "Oh, all these adults are going on about something big! Reincarnation? What's that! Uh oh, everyone is looking at me expectantly! I don't want to disappoint anybody, I'd better tell them what they want to hear!"

"Wow! I got all kinds of attention and stuff for that! I'd better tell everyone I've been reincarnated!"

[Anonymous No.2247118]

what about DMT? not so much reincarnation, but the experience of consciousness creating the physical.

[Anonymous No.2247119]

>>2247093

[Anonymous No.2247129]

>>2247119

[Anonymous No.2247347]

Reincarnation sounds neat and stuff, but to be honest I couldn't care less if my memory is reset in the process. What's the point of being born again if I don't remember anything? It's just a different person.

You could compare it to cloning, my clone will live on, but it won't be my consciousness anymore.