HOLY SHIT! SOMETHING WORTH INTEREST!

[Anomynous No.2224360]

So this is my first time posting in /sci/, so please bear with me, I just need some help wrapping my head around this.

inb4stoptrolling inb4OPcan'tinb4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ImvlS8PLIo

So I just listened to this dude talk for about an hour, and he's talking about how to basically measure the universe.

>You are now aware that 90% of your mass is empty space. Completely. Empty. Space. Nothing.

I must say that I ignored all his religious puns. I believe Religion =/= Science, and vice versa.

So this guy is stating that there could be multiple universes also! For you dumbfags, our universe is believed to be it. Planet -> System -> Galaxy -> Universe. That's it, but we can never physically see another universe because it is traveling faster than the speed of light, and if that's happening there's no way we can see it. BUT because of dark matter a.k.a. that nothing we're 90% made up of, we can test to see if it is possible, and... and... I need to discuss this shit with someone!

Anyone! C'mon!

[Anonymous No.2224366]

>uses inb4 as the original post
>other "universes" travel faster than light
>empty space
>WHY.jpg

[Anonymous No.2224368]

>>2224360
It is nice to see your interest in science.
How old are you 10? 14?

[Anonymous No.2224371]

Religion =/= Science also implies Science =/= Religion by the way.

[Anonymous No.2224373]

Subtle troll is subtle.

[Anomynous No.2224376]

>>2224371
Learn what vice versa means.

>>2224368
You're a nigger.

>>2224366
Fuck you, and also, it not that hard to believe other universes, or even our own universe, would travel at the speed of light. Because of the Big Bang, we're all traveling at the speed of light, so...

I expected yall to be pompous dicks. I'm just trying to understand this shit. I ain't even mad though.

[Anonymous No.2224380]

>That's it, but we can never physically see another universe because it is traveling faster than the speed of light, and if that's happening there's no way we can see it.
>Implying that's the reason.
>Implying there is space between universes.
>Implying he didn't mean the rest of our own universe.

[Anomynous No.2224381]

>>2224373

You're a nigger too.

Has a nice day.

[Anonymous No.2224382]

I thought summer was over.

[Anonymous No.2224383]

Id imagine that a universe would be seperated from other universe by barriers rather than just distance...kinda boring

[Anomynous No.2224388]

>>2224380

He actually touched on that, the edge of the universe. And we can measure down to 1% how big our universe actually is, but the problem being that past that would be impossible to see. It would be as a wall, opaque, because of radiations and whatnot.

[Anonymous No.2224389]

>>That's it, but we can never physically see another universe because it is traveling faster than the speed of light, and if that's happening there's no way we can see it.
>dark matter a.k.a. that nothing we're 90% made up of
Wrong.
Fuck off, troll

[Anomynous No.2224390]

WTF!? I IS NOT TROLLIN'!

[Anomynous No.2224394]

>>2224383

From what I get from this guy, it is. A barrier of radiation.

BUT WHAT I THINK SOME NEED TO REMEMBER, is that if something is traveling faster than the speed of light away from us, than it cannot be SEEN. Because we see LIGHT.

>hope i'm right on that... -_-

[Anonymous No.2224401]

>>2224394
But universes don't travel with the speed of light from anywhere. Whatever there is in between universes, I'd say it's pretty safe to say that it isn't anything that's familiar to us. For a definite answer we'd have to be able to experimentally probe the "region" in between universes to come up with any useful theory, which can't be done.
The speed of light is a random constant that most likely doesn't even exist in or in between most other universes, if there are any. It applies only within our own universe.

[Anomynous No.2224411]

>>2224401
>>2224401

10:04 on vid

Say that the universe... universes, or space in between isn't traveling out or away but spreading... did that make any sense?

And our speed of light would have to be SOME sort of velocity in another... wouldn't it?

[Anomynous No.2224418]

Wait, I think I'm missing it on the speed of light thing, The speed of light is a number though, whether it's a certain percentage off it's still a number, right?

[Anonymous No.2224425]

>>2224411
>And our speed of light would have to be SOME sort of velocity in another... wouldn't it?

[Anomynous No.2224433]

>>2224425

Because it's a number... I'm wrong as fuck aren't I.

[Anonymous No.2224437]

>>2224411
>10:04 on vid
The "outside the universe" thing was just for demonstrational purposes. He spoke of a 2D universe that can be observed from outside and us since we're 3D. He didn't mean that it's actually possible.

[Anomynous No.2224438]

I do believe I've wasted yalls time.

[Anonymous No.2224442]

>>2224411
The speed of light is just one constant of many. I think you're trying to say that if we'd "shoot" light into another universe it should still travel at the speed of light within that universe as well. Now let's say for the sake of argument that it's actually possible to do something like that. It would still depend on the universe and its laws. If it's just like our own universe the light would travel at the speed of light. But most universe would most likely be vastly different to our own.
Most likely we'd shoot into an universe with laws that wouldn't allow light to exist. Our light wouldn't be able to enter this universe.

[Anomynous No.2224452]

>>2224442

Okay, so even if we could penetrate through the edge of our universe to see past it, we most likely wouldn't be able to see anything anyway because it wouldn't be the same set of rules. But, for the sake of argument, let's say all universes have the same rules, just different results, would we still be able to see them???

Wait, I take that back. Because than I'm just making myself out to be right.

In any case, this hour long vid was definitely not a waste of my time. You should check it out.

[Anonymous No.2224474]

How can something with mass be accelerated beyond the speed of light? Which model supports such?

[Anonymous No.2224482]

>>2224474
You can't as far as I know. You'd need exactly an infite amount of energy to a accelerate any mass to the speed of light. And at that point it'd stop being mass and it'd become light.

[Anonymous No.2224490]

>>2224360
The universe is defined as "all space" you could get to through motion, including traveling the speed of light, or faster.

Why didn't you answer my question about age? are you 12? 15? It is nice that you are intrested in science at such a young age, but you gotta remeber that your level of thinking is not on par with the people that actually studying this shit for a living. If you ever want to know adanced shit, you need to start off small litttle guy. Do you know about Newtons 3 laws?

[Anomynous No.2224491]

>>2224490

...

I hate you.

[Anonymous No.2224492]

>>2224452
>edge of our universe

Wtf am I reading?
There is no edge you dumbshit! An edge implies a boundary, but there is no fucking boundary. There is no physical "edge"!

[Anonymous No.2224493]

>>2224491
Why so angry?
Is it past your bed time?

[Anonymous No.2224495]

>>2224482
>And at that point it'd stop being mass and it'd become light

Where the fuck are you getting such nonsense from?

[Anomynous No.2224498]

>>2224492
>>2224492

Then wtf am I supposed to call this!?

35:39

[Anomynous No.2224502]

>>2224493

Yes, I am.
And no, I don't care.
Fag.

[Anonymous No.2224503]

>>2224491
Why? I am just trying to help you understand shit better. It is not my fault you are underage with little if no education.

Your whole post, >>2224360, is just incohernt nonsense. Whatever that video is, it must be really really really shitty. I suggest you read a book.

[Anonymous No.2224504]

>>2224495
I believe Discovery Channel propagates such bullshit.

[Anomynous No.2224510]

So anyway, I'm not actually saying that there's a wall, I'm referring to the last scattering surface of the big bang

[Anonymous No.2224511]

lol OP why so butthurt?

[Anonymous No.2224517]

>>2224498
Call wat?
How about you try making some fucking sense?

Again, the universe is defined to include all connected physical reality. You cannot simply just leave it. If you go futher and futher, you will just get more universe. Nothing can physicaly "leave". BECUASE THATS HOW WE FUCKING DEFINED THE UNIVERSE.

When physicist talk about "multiverses", they are not talking about some "other universes" physically next to ours...LMAO. They are talking about some unphysically (at leaat in 4d), disjoint objects.

[Anonymous No.2224526]

>>2224360
>90% of my mass is empty space

i think you wanted to use the word "volume"

[Anomynous No.2224537]

Alright! Alright, whatever. I was talking about the video, hence why posted a link with times and shit for reference, but whatever. Trying to learn new shit, thought atheist scientology douchebags would relate to that, but no. Whatever. Fuck it. I'll delete this thread later. So fuck you /sci/, you pompous arrogant assholes. (Half of you just wtf'd at the screen, shaking your head) Just trying to learn new shit, or at least shit that was new to me. Have fun talking shit to one another and not getting anything done, as if anything else went on 4chan.

>>2224511
And you. I just wanted to let you know that your taste in women are sub-par at best. You have the whole internet at your disposal and you pick that odd bitch. That bitch be odd.

>I AM this mad. Deal with it.

[Anonymous No.2224544]

>atheist scientology douchebags
>scientology
I'm starting to think we're dealing with another species here.

[Anonymous No.2224547]

>>2224537
Yep, that thing in >>2224511 totally looks like a woman.