[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 10 KB, 194x252, FAGGOTRY.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2122243 No.2122243 [Reply] [Original]

"it snowed in England so global warming's a conspiracy derp"

>>>/new/3019817

Tell these faggots what it's like.

>> No.2122253

Yes, because we're just dogs, waiting around all day for you to tell us who to attack.

>> No.2122257

>implying we should tell the equivalent of a brick wall what global warming is all about

>> No.2122275

>>2122243
seriously, stop hanging around there... you are in risk for brain damage.

>> No.2122282

>>2122243
global warming is a conspiracy, thats why the U.N. is the only one who cares about it. as much as you'll think im an idiot its goal is to boost third world countries at the expense of N. America and Europe. Think about it, china has no sanctions on its polution because its a "developing nation" even though its the single largest waste maker in the world. Same with all these african countries. The climate is truly cyclical. dont worry about global warming, worry about the fact that there are scientist out there botching results for personal gain. they're the ones who can really cause destruction

>> No.2122289

>>2122282
0/10

>> No.2122300

>>2122289
>its wrong cause im a brainwashed sheep and care about dying minnows.

You perpetuate the cycle of stupidity.

>> No.2122303

>>2122282
Security! we have a geological idiot in here again!

Seriously guys, keep the rabble out or I'm cutting your christmas bonus!

>> No.2122343

>>2122303
>>2122289
>>2122243
OH WOW. I had no idea 4chan was this stupid... You really believe a bunch of yuppies and scientists whose results have been debunked as fake are telling the truth? lol.

>> No.2122369

>>2122343
let's take it slowly...

>You really believe a bunch of yuppies

No, we don't believe yuppies

>and scientists

We do tend to believe scientists that publish solid arguments in peer-reviewed journals.

>whose results have been debunked

The results weren't debunked, and your saying so means nothing.

>as fake

What, you said it twice so it must be true?

>are telling the truth?

Essentially, yes.

>lol.

Indeed.